Penalized estimation in finite mixture of ultra-high dimensional regression models

References

• Beaver, W. H., and S. G. Ryan. 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (1):127. doi:10.2307/2672925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, J. B., R. C. Green, and V. Naik. 1999. Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns. The Journal of Finance 54 (5):1553–607. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, P., and J. Huang. 2011. Coordinate descent algorithms for nonconvex penalized regression, with applications to biological feature selection. The Annals of Applied Statistics 5 (1):232–53. doi:10.1214/10-AOAS388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and J. Kalbfleisch. 1996. Penalized minimum-distance estimates in finite mixture models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 24 (2):167–75. doi:10.2307/3315623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and A. Khalili. 2008. Order selection in finite mixture models with a nonsmooth penalty. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484):1674–83. doi:10.1198/016214508000001075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSarbo, W. S., and W. L. Cron. 1988. A maximum likelihood methodology for clusterwise linear regression. Journal of Classification 5 (2):249–82. doi:10.1007/BF01897167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, P. 2004. Pe ratios, peg ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79 (1):73–95. doi:10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and R. Li. 2001. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (456):1348–60. doi:10.1198/016214501753382273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and H. Peng. 2004. Nonconcave penalized likelihood with a diverging number of parameters. The Annals of Statistics 32 (3):928–61. doi:10.1214/009053604000000256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., L. Xue, and H. Zou. 2014. Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation. Annals of Statistics 42 (3):819–49. doi:10.1214/13-AOS1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley, C., and A. E. Raftery. 2002. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (458):611–31. doi:10.1198/016214502760047131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2010. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33 (1):1–22. doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2006. Finite mixture and Markov switching models. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfeld, S. M., and R. E. Quandt. 1973. A markov model for switching regressions. Journal of Econometrics 1 (1):3–15. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(73)90002-X.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, C. 2000. Identifiability of models for clusterwise linear regression. Journal of Classification 17 (2):273–96. doi:10.1007/s003570000022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M., S. Wang, H. Wang, and T. Jin. 2018. Maximum smoothed likelihood estimation for a class of semiparametric pareto mixture densities. Statistics and Its Interface 11 (1):31–40. doi:10.4310/SII.2018.v11.n1.a3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., H. Peng, and K. Zhang. 2017. Model selection for gaussian mixture models. Statistica Sinica 27 (1):147–69. doi:10.5705/ss.2014.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurn, M., A. Justel, and C. P. Robert. 2003. Estimating mixtures of regressions. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 12 (1):55–79. doi:10.1198/1061860031329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, G., and H. Wang. 2005. Should firms with two consecutive annual losses be specially treated (st)? Economic Research Journal 38 (2):894–942.
   Google Scholar
• Karlis, D., and E. Xekalaki. 2003. Choosing initial values for the em algorithm for finite mixtures. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 41 (3-4):577–90. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00177-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keribin, C. 2000. Consistent estimate of the order of mixture models. Sankhy = a, Series A 62:49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, A., and J. Chen. 2007. Variable selection in finite mixture of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 (479):1025–38. doi:10.1198/016214507000000590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., H. Choi, and H.-S. Oh. 2008. Smoothly clipped absolute deviation on high dimensions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484):1665–73. doi:10.1198/016214508000001066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S., and Y. Kim. 2012. Large sample properties of the scad-penalized maximum likelihood estimation on high dimensions. Statistica Sinica 22 (2):629–53. doi:10.5705/ss.2010.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroux, B. G. 1992. Consistent estimation of a mixing distribution. The Annals of Statistics 20 (3):1350–60. doi:10.1214/aos/1176348772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., Y. V. Hui, and A. H. Lee. 2003. Minimum hellinger distance estimation for finite mixtures of poisson regression models and its applications. Biometrics 59 (4):1016–26. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00117.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, R., H. Wang, and C.-L. Tsai. 2008. On mixture regression shrinkage and selection via the MR-Lasso. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 46:403–14.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., and D. Peel. 2004. Finite mixture models. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt, R. E., and J. B. Ramsey. 1978. Estimating mixtures of normal distributions and switching regressions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73 (364):730–8. doi:10.1080/01621459.1978.10480085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Städler, N., P. Bühlmann, and S. Van De Geer. 2010. L1-penalization for mixture regression models. Test 19 (2):209–56. doi:10.1007/s11749-010-0197-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., G. Li, and G. Jiang. 2007. Robust regression shrinkage and consistent variable selection through the LAD-Lasso. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 25 (3):347–55. doi:10.1198/073500106000000251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., M. L. Puterman, I. Cockburn, and N. Le. 1996. Mixed poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates. Biometrics 52 (2):381–400. pages doi:10.2307/2532881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., and X. Wang. 2020. A new model selection procedure for finite mixture regression models. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 49 (18):4347–20. doi:10.1080/03610926.2019.1601222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H.-T., and H. Zhang. 2004. Hypothesis testing in mixture regression models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 66 (1):3–16. doi:10.1046/j.1369-7412.2003.05379.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar