Generalized multiple dependent state sampling plans for coefficient of variation

References

• Aslam, M., S. Balamurali, M. Azam, G. S. Rao, and C.-H. Jun. 2015. Mixed multiple dependent state sampling plans based on process capability index. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 43 (1):171–78. doi:10.1520/JTE20130009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., S. Balamurali, and C.-H. Jun. 2019. A new multiple dependent state sampling plan based on the process capability index. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1588307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. A. Raza, and C.-H. Jun. 2020. A new variable control chart under generalized multiple dependent state sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 49 (9):2321–32. To appear. doi:10.1080/03610918.2018.1517213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-H. Yen, C.-H. Chang, and C.-H. Jun. 2014. Multiple dependent state variable sampling plans with process loss consideration. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 71 (5–8):1337–43. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5574-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C.-H. Jun. 2007. Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3):1221–30. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., A. Achouri, H. Taleb, G. Celano, and S. Psarakis. 2015. Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 80 (9–12):1561–76. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6985-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X., and S. O. Oyadiji. 2001. Application of coefficient of variation in reliability-based mechanical design and manufacture. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 119 (1–3):374–78. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00938-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglewicz, B., R. H. Myers, and R. B. Howe. 1968. On the percentage points of the sample coefficient of variation. Biometrika 55 (3):580–81. doi:10.1093/biomet/55.3.580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C. W., M. S. Lee, Y. J. Seong, and D. M. Hawkins. 2007. A control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Quality Technology 39 (2):151–58. doi:10.1080/00224065.2007.11917682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniati, N., R. H. Yeh, and C. W. Wu. 2015. Designing a variables two-plan sampling system of type, TNTVSS-(nT, nN; k) for controlling process fraction nonconforming with unilateral specification limit fraction non-conforming. International Journal of Production Research 53 (7):2011–25. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.946159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. G. 1998. Sampling inspection plan of variation coefficient about logarithmic normal and Weibull distribution. Journal of Mathematics for Technology 14:35–39. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. W., S. W. Lin, and C. W. Wu. 2014. A resubmitted sampling scheme by variables inspection for controlling lot fraction nonconforming. International Journal of Production Research 52 (12):3744–54. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.886028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. J., and Z. H. Zou. 2012. Water quality evaluation based on improved fuzzy matter-element method. Journal of Environmental Sciences 24 (7):1210–16. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60938-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, B. J., and J. H. Zhang. 1997. The CV method for structural reliability inspection. Journal of Mechanical Strength 19 (2):29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, W. K., B. W.-T. Yu, M. D. Troutt, and S. H. Hou. 2008. A simulation-based approach to the study of coefficient of variation of dividend yields. European Journal of Operational Research 189 (2):559–69. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, H. M., D. R. Ekman, T. W. Collette, and M. R. Viant. 2009. Spectral relative standard deviation: A practical benchmark in metabolomics. The Analyst 134 (3):478–85. doi:10.1039/b808986h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, G. S., M. Aslam, and C.-H. Jun. 2019. A variable sampling plan using generalized multiple dependent state based on a one-sided process capability index. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, G. S., M. A. Raza, M. Aslam, A. H. Al-Marshadi, and C.-H. Jun. 2019. A variable control chart based on process capability index under generalized multiple dependent state sampling. IEEE Access 7:34031–44. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, M. A., and M. Aslam. 2019. Design of control charts for multivariate Poisson distribution using generalized multiple dependent state sampling. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 16 (6):629–50. doi:10.1080/16843703.2018.1497935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, G. F., F. Lynn, and B. D. Meade. 2002. Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 9 (6):1235–39. doi:10.1128/cdli.9.6.1235-1239.2002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seidel, W. 1997. Is sampling by variables worse than sampling by attributes? A decision theoretic analysis and a new mixed strategy for inspecting individual lots. Sankhya B 59:96–107.
   Google Scholar
• Sheu, L. C., C. H. Yeh, and C. H. Yen. 2014. Developing acceptance-sampling plans based on incapability index Cpp. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences 8 (5):2509–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Z. L., and Y. He. 2008. Sampling inspection plan for the coefficient of variation of Gumbel distribution. Structure & Environment Engineering 35:57–61. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir, M. H., G. M. Cordeiro, M. Mansoor, and M. Zubair. 2014. The Weibull-Lomax distribution: Properties and applications. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 44 (14):1–474. doi:10.15672/HJMS.2014147465.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, Y., and Q. Chen. 1991. Sampling inspection by variables for coefficient of variation. Math Theory of Probability and Its Applications 3:315–27. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Verrill, S., and R. A. Johnson. 2007. Confidence bounds and hypothesis tests for normal distribution coefficients of variation. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 36 (12):2187–206. doi:10.1080/03610920701215126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham, A. W., and R. C. Baker. 1976. Multiple deferred state sampling inspection. International Journal of Production Research 14 (6):719–31. doi:10.1080/00207547608956391.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W. 2012. An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index. European Journal of Operational Research 223 (1):116–22. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, A. J., S. Y. Liu, and X. J. Dong. 2016. Variables two stage sampling plans based on the coefficient of variation. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing 10 (1):JAMDSM0002–JAMDSM0002. doi:10.1299/jamdsm.2016jamdsm0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, C. H., and C. H. Chang. 2009. Designing variables sampling plans with process loss consideration. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38 (8):1579–91. doi:10.1080/03610910903046809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., M. B. C. Khoo, W. L. Teoh, and P. Castagliola. 2016. A control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (3):1213–25. doi:10.1002/qre.1828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. H. 1989. The structural reliability design and analysis. Beijing: Press of Aerospace.
   Google Scholar