The effect of gauge measurement errors on double sampling X¯ control chart

References

• Ahmad, S., M. Riaz, S. A. Abbasi, and Z. Lin. 2013. On monitoring process variability under double sampling scheme. International Journal of Production Economics 142 (2):388–400. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif, F., M. Noor-Ul-Amin, and M. Hanif. 2021. Joint monitoring of mean and variance using likelihood ratio test statistic with measurement error. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 18 (2):202–24. doi:10.1080/16843703.2020.1819138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif, F., S. Khan, and M. Noor-Ul-Amin. 2021. Hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart with measurement error. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science 44:801–11. doi:10.1007/s40995-020-00879-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. W., and H. Mao. 2008. A multivariate semi-circle control chart for variables data. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 5 (4):331–8. doi:10.1080/16843703.2008.11673405.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X. B., and F. K. Wang. 2018. The performance of EWMA median and CUSUM median control charts for a normal process with measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 34 (2):203–13. doi:10.1002/qre.2248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croasdale, R. 1974. Control charts for a double-sampling scheme based on average production run lengths. International Journal of Production Research 12 (5):585–92. doi:10.1080/00207547408919577.
   Google Scholar
• Daudin, J. J. 1992. Double sampling X¯ charts. Journal of Quality Technology 24 (2):78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Nguyen, H., Q. T. Nguyen, T. H. Nguyen, N. Balakrishnan, and K. Phuc. 2020. The performance of the EWMA median chart in the presence of measurement error. Artificial Intelligence Evolution 1 (1):48–62. doi:10.37256/aie.112020401.
   Google Scholar
• Inghilleri, R., T. Lupo, and G. Passannanti. 2015. An effective double sampling scheme for the c control chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (2):205–16. doi:10.1002/qre.1572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazuka, T. 1986. The effect of measurement error on the power of X¯-R charts. Journal of Quality Technology 18 (2):91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalafi, S., A. Salmasnia, and M. R. Maleki. 2020. Remedial approaches to decrease the effect of measurement errors on simple linear profile monitoring. International Journal for Quality Research 14 (4):1019–36. doi:10.24874/IJQR14.04-03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, M. B., H. C. Lee, Z. Wu, C. H. Chen, and P. Castagliola. 2010. A synthetic double sampling control chart for the process mean. IIE Transactions 43 (1):23–38. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2010.491503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, M. B., E. K. Tan, Z. L. Chong, and S. Haridy. 2015. Side-sensitive group runs double sampling (SSGRDS) chart for detecting mean shifts. International Journal of Production Research 53 (15):4735–53. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1043033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. H., and M. B. Khoo. 2017. Synthetic double sampling S chart. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 46 (12):5914–31. doi:10.1080/03610926.2015.1115073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. H., Y. C. Chang, and C. C. Torng. 2012. A design of S control charts with a combined double sampling and variable sampling interval scheme. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 41 (1):153–65. doi:10.1080/03610926.2010.521283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linna, K. W., and W. H. Woodall. 2001. Effect of measurement error on Shewhart control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 33 (2):213–22. doi:10.1080/00224065.2001.11980068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, M. R., A. Amiri, and P. Castagliola. 2017. Measurement errors in statistical process monitoring: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 103:316–29. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, M. R., R. Ghashghaei, and A. Amiri. 2016. Simultaneous monitoring of multivariate process mean and variability in the presence of measurement error with linearly increasing variance under additive covariate model (research note). International Journal of Engineering 29 (4):514–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malela-Majika, J. C. 2019. Modified side-sensitive synthetic double sampling monitoring scheme for simultaneously monitoring the process mean and variability. Computers & Industrial Engineering 130:798–814. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malela-Majika, J. C., and E. M. Rapoo. 2019. Side-sensitive synthetic double sampling X control charts. European Journal of Industrial Engineering 13 (1):117–48. doi:10.1504/EJIE.2019.10019375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravelakis, P. E. 2012. Measurement error effect on the CUSUM control chart. Journal of Applied Statistics 39 (2):323–36. doi:10.1080/02664763.2011.590188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravelakis, P., J. Panaretos, and S. Psarakis. 2004. EWMA chart and measurement error. Journal of Applied Statistics 31 (4):445–55. doi:10.1080/02664760410001681738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor-Ul-Amin, M. 2021. Impact of measurement error on mixed EWMA-CUSUM control chart. Scientia Iranica. Advance online publication. doi:10.24200/SCI.2020.53453.3244.
   Google Scholar
• Noor-Ul-Amin, M., A. Javaid, M. Hanif, and E. Dogu. 2020. Performance of maximum EWMA control chart in the presence of measurement error using auxiliary information. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03610918.2020.1772301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor-Ul-Amin, M., A. Riaz, and A. Safeer. 2019. Exponentially weighted moving average control chart using auxiliary variable with measurement error. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1661474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, M. 2014. Monitoring of process parameters under measurement errors. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 42 (4):20130116–988. doi:10.1520/JTE20130116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmasnia, A., M. R. Maleki, and S. T. A. Niaki. 2018. Remedial measures to lessen the effect of imprecise measurement with linearly increasing variance on the performance of the MAX-EWMAMS scheme. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 43 (6):3151–62. doi:10.1007/s13369-017-2896-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, A., P. Castagliola, J. Sun, and X. Hu. 2018. The effect of measurement errors on the adaptive EWMA X¯ chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 34 (4):609–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torng, C. C., and P. H. Lee. 2009. The performance of double sampling control charts under non normality. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38 (3):541–57. doi:10.1080/03610910802571188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, P. H., K. P. Tran, and A. Rakitzis. 2019. A synthetic median control chart for monitoring the process mean with measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 35 (4):1100–16. doi:10.1002/qre.2447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, F. S., P. Castagliola, K. P. Tran, and M. B. C. Khoo. 2020. Performance of the MEWMA‐CoDa control chart in the presence of measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 36 (7):2411–40. doi:10.1002/qre.2705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar