Quality control procedures at statistics sweden

References

• Bailar B.A. Dalenius T. Estimating the Response Variance Components of the US Bureau of the Census Technical report Survey Model. Sankhya 1969 Series B, Vol. 31, Parts 3 & 4, 341-360
   Google Scholar
• Bergman L.R. Thorslund M. Response Quality in the Swedish Labour Force Surveys.Methodological Studies from the Research Institute for Statistics on Living Statistics Sweden 1980 341 360 No. 13 E.
   Google Scholar
• Biemer P.P. An Improved Procedure for Estimating the Components o f Response Variance i n Complex Surveys Unpublished memo.
   Google Scholar
• Biemer , P. P. and Stokes , S. L. 1985 . Optimal Design of Interviewer Variance Experiments i n Complex Surveys . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 80 ( 389 ) : 158 – 166 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogestrom , B. , Larsson , M. and Lyberg , L. 1983 . “ Bibliography on Nonresponse and Related Topics ” . In In 'Panel on Incomplete Data: Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys , Vol. 2 , 479 – 567 . Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Casady R.J. A Model for Analysis o f Reinterview Data in the NCHS Health Interview Survey Memo, US Department of Health 1966 Education and We1 fare
   Google Scholar
• Cochran , W. G. 1977 . Sampling Techniques , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Cook , W. H. . A Point System of Quality Control. In : American society for Quality Control Science i n Management. Proceedings o f . pp. 207 – 209 . Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Coulter , J. 1984 . The Use o f Matching in the Evaluation of Non-Sampling Errorsin the 1981 Canadian Censusof Agriculture . Survey Methodology , 10 ( 2 ) : 165 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• Dalén J. How Large Must the Sample Size Be? Nominal Confidence Levels Versus Actual Coverage Probabilities in Simple Random Sampling 1984 Promemorior frin SCB, No. 8., Statistics Sweden
   Google Scholar
• Dalenius , T. 1962 . Recent Advances i n Sample Survey Theory and Methods . Anna1s o f Mathematical Statistics , 33 ( 2 ) : 325 – 349 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalenius T. Statistiska Institionen 1974 Ends and Means of Total Survey Design. Forsk-ningsprojektet FEL I UNDERSÖKNINGAR Stockholms universitet
   Google Scholar
• Dalenius , T. 1985 . Relevant OfficialStatistics : Some Ref1ections on Conceptual and Operational Issues . Journal of Officialstatistics , 1 ( 2 ) : 21 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Dalenius , T. and Frank , O. 1968 . Control of Classification . Rwview of the International Statistical Institute , 36 ( 3 ) : 279 – 295 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasteau , H. H. , Ingram , J. J. and Minton , G. 1964 . Control of Qua1ity of Coding in the 1960 Censuses . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 59 ( 305 ) : 120 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellegi , I .P. 1964 . Response Variance and Its Estimation . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 59 ( 305 ) : 1016 – 1041 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellegi , I .P. 1973 . The Evaluation o f the Accuracy of Survey Results: Some Canadian Experiences . International Statistical Reviw , 41 ( 305 ) : 1 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsman , G. and Garas , T. 1982 . Optimal Estimation of Change in Sample Surveys. American Statistical Association . Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods , 41 ( 305 ) : 417 – 420 .
   Google Scholar
• Granquist , L. 1984 . On the Role of Editing . Statistical Review , 2 ( 305 ) : 105 – 113 .
   Google Scholar
• Hansen , M. H. , Hurwitz , W. N. and Bershad , M. A. 1961 . Measurement Errors in Censuses and Surveys . Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute , 38 ( 2 ) : 359 – 374 .
   Google Scholar
• Hansen M.H. Hurwitz W.N. Pritzker L. The Estimation and Interpretation of Gross Differences and the Simple Response Variance In 'Contributions to Statistics , presented to Professor P.C. Mahalanobis on the occasion of his 70th birthday ,pp 111-136.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley , H. O. and Rao , J. N. K. 1978 . “ Estimation of Nonsampling Variance Components in Sample Surveys ” . In Survey Sampling and Measurement , Edited by: In Namboodiri , N. K. 35 – 43 . Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jabine , T. B. and Tepping , B. J. . Controlling the Quality of occupation and Industry Data Invited paper presented at the International Statistical Institute meeting in .
   Google Scholar
• Krotki K. (1980): Response Error in the 1976 Census of Population and Housing. Working Paper,Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Service Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lavin , M. 1946 . Inspection Efficiency and Sampling In spection Plans . Journal of the American Statistical Association , : 432 – 438 .
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrom , H. , ed. 1983 . Non-Response Errors in Sample Surveys , Vol. 16 , Statistics Sweden : Urval .
   Google Scholar
• Lyberg , I. , Haglund , T. , Lyberg , L. and Wretman , J. 1978 . The Allocation of Resources to Production and Control Steps in the Statistical Process . Statistical Review , 4 : 253 – 276 .
   Google Scholar
• Lyberg L. (n.d. 1 : Beroende och oberoende kontroll av kodning. Rapport nr 4, Forskningsprojektet FEL I UNDERSOKNINGAR, Stockholms universitet , Stockholm ( In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Lyberg L. (1969)On the Formation of Coding Teams in the Case of Independent Verificati on Under Cost Considerations. Forsknings-projektet FEL I UNDERSOKNINGAR, Stockholms universitet , Stockholm, r apportnr 18.
   Google Scholar
• Lyberg , L. 1981 . Control of the Coding Operation in Statistical Investigations - Some Contributions , Vol. 13 , Statistics Sweden : Ph D thesis . Urval .
   Google Scholar
• Lyberg , L. and Rapaport , E. 1979 . Non-Response Problems at Statistics Sweden. American Statistical Association . Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods , 13 : 348 – 352 .
   Google Scholar
• Medin , K. 1984 . Timel iness in the Production of Officaial Statistics . Statistical Reviw , 1 : 5 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Minton , G. 1969 . Inspection and Correction Error in Data Processing . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 2 ( 2 ) : 56 – 98 .
   Google Scholar
• Minton , G. 1969 . Some Decision Rules for Administrative Applications of Quality Control . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 2 ( 2 ) : 86 – 98 .
   Google Scholar
• Minton G. (1970 b) : Comments on Quality Control and Research in Data Processing Program. Paper presented at the American Society for Quality Control, March 12-13, Arlington , Virginia .
   Google Scholar
• Minton , G. 1972 . Verification Error in Single Sampling Inspection Plans for Processing Survey Data . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 67 ( 337 ) : 46 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minton , G. and Krivitsky , Z. F. 1971 . Two Additional Properties of a Model for Quality Control of Administrative Processes . Journal of Quality Technology , 3 ( 1 ) : 6 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Raj , Des . 1983 . Sampling Theory , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Savage I.R. Considerations of Data Quality.In "Setting StatisticalPriorities: Report of the PanelonMethodology for Statistical Priorities of the Committeeon Natural Sciences National ResearchCouncil, Natural Academy of Sciences Washington, D.C. June 1976 102 104 Appendix G
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada . 1978 . A Compendium of Methods of Error Evaluationin Censuses and Surveys Catalogue 13-564E Occasional
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada . 1979 . Riktlinjer för kvalitetsredovisning avstatistik (Guidelines for Presentation of the Quality of Statistics) , Statistics Sweden : Stockholm . Statistics Sweden ():.(InSwedish.) Reportson Statistical Coordination
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada . 1982 . GRUS-manual. Interactive Editing of Statistical Data , Statistics Sweden : Memo .
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada . 1983 . Policy for anvandarorienterad kvalitets- redovisning av statistik. , Vol. 1 , Statistics Sweden : Stockholm . (PolicyforaUser-Oriented Presentation of the QualityofStatistics.) (InSwedish.) Reportson Statisti-cal Coordination
   Google Scholar
• Sukhatme , P.V. and Seth , G. R. 1952 . Non-Sampling Errorsin Surveys . Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics , 4 : 5 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of the Census . 1960 . United States Censuses of Popula-tionand Housing , Vol. 1 , Washington, D.C. : Microfilming,Coding . Quality Control of Preparatory Operations
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of the Census . 1960 . Eva1uation and Research Program of the US Censuses of Populationand Housing Vol. 9 , Washington, D.C. Effects of Coders. Series ER60
   Google Scholar
• US Bureau of the Census . 1983 . Approaches to Developing Question-naires. Edited by: DeMaio , T.J. A Report by the Subcommittee on Questionnaire Design
   Google Scholar
• Warner , S. L. 1965 . Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias . Journal of the American Statisti-cal Association , 60 : 63 – 69 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar