REFERENCES
- About COUNTER. 2013. About COUNTER (last modified March 2014). http://www.projectcounter.org/about.html
- Bernon, J. 2008. Why and how to measure the use of electronic resources. Liber Quarterly, 18(3/4): 459–463. http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/URN%3ANBN%3ANL%3AUI%3A10-1-113548/8219 (accessed July 1, 2013).
- Blecic, D. D., J. B. Fiscella, and S. E. Wiberley, Jr. 2007. Measurement of use of electronic resources: Advances in use statistics and innovations in resource functionality. College & Research Libraries 68(1): 26–44. http://crl.acrl.org/content/68/1/26.full.pdf+html (accessed March 1, 2014).
- Blecic, D. D., S. E. Wiberley, Jr, J. Fiscella, S. Bahnmaier-Blaszczak, and R. Lowery. 2013. Deal or no deal? Evaluating Big Deals and their journals. College & Research Libraries 74(2): 178–194. http://crl.acrl.org/content/74/2/178.full.pdf+html (accessed March 14, 2014).
- Chunrong, C., W. Jingfen, and Z. Zhinong. 2010. Regional consortia for e-resources: A case study of deals in the South China Region. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 44(4): 328–341. doi:10.1108/00330331011083220
- Code of Practice. 2013. COUNTER compliance—A step-by-step guide for vendors (last modified April 2014). http://www.projectcounter.org/code_practice.html
- Conyers, A. 2004. E-measures: Developing statistical measures for electronic information services. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 34(4): 148–153. doi:10.1108/03055720410570911
- Coombs, K. A. 2005. Lessons learned from analyzing library database usage data. Library Hi Tech 23(4): 598–609. doi:10.1108/07378830510636373
- Cotero, C., S. Carrico, and M. R. Tennant. 2008. Using comparative online journal usage studies to assess the Big Deal. Library Resources & Technical Services 52(2): 61–68. doi:10.5860/lrts.52n2.61
- COUNTER Code. 2002. COUNTER code of practice. http://www.projectcounter.org/code_practice_r1.html (accessed December 28, 2013).
- COUNTER Code of Practice. 2008. Journal and databases: Release 3. http://www.projectcounter.org/r3/Release3D9.pdf (accessed December 28, 2013).
- Davis, P. M. 2002. Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries 63(6): 484–497. http://crl.acrl.org/content/63/6/484.full.pdf+html (accessed November 11, 2013).
- Davis, P. M., and J. S. Price. 2006. eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: Implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(9): 1243–1248. doi:10.1002/asi.v57:9
- Dean, C. E., and K. Jager. 2009. Statistics for electronic resources. South African Journal of Library & Information Sciences 75(1): 76–85.
- Glanzel, W. 2003. Bibliometrics as a Research Field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. http://www.cin.ufpe.br/∼ajhol/futuro/references/01%23_Bibliometrics_Module_KUL_BIBLIOMETRICS%20AS%20A%20RESEARCH%20FIELD.pdf ( accessed June 12, 2013).
- Introduction. 2012. Introduction to release 4 of the COUNTER code of practice for e-resources. http://www.projectcounter.org/r4/INTROR4.pdf (accessed March 16, 2014).
- Karasözen, B. 2008. Consortial usage of electronic journals in Turkey. Liber Quarterly 18(3/4): 464–469.
- Luther, J. 2001. White paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 6(3). doi:doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0006.304
- Mavodza, J. 2011. Information seeking behaviour of library users at Metropolitan College of New York. Reference Services Review 39(4): 643–653. doi:10.1108/00907321111186668
- Moen, W. E., F. Oguz, and C. R. McClure. 2004. The challenges of nonstandardized vendor usage data in a statewide metasearch environment: The Library of Texas experience. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 74(4): 403–422. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/427412 (accessed October 22, 2013).
- Nicholas, D., D. Clark, I. Rowlands, and H. R. Jamali. 2009. Online use and information seeking behaviour: Institutional and subject comparisons of UK researchers. Journal of Information Science 35(6): 660–676. doi:10.1177/0165551509338341
- Nicholas, D., P. Huntington, H. R. Hamali, and C. Tenopir. 2006. Finding information in (very large) digital libraries: A deep log approach to determining differences in use according to method of access. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(2): 121–122. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.005
- Nicholas, D., I. Rowlands, P. Huntington, H. R. Jamali, and P. H. Salazar. 2010. Diversity in the e-journal use and information-seeking behaviour of UK researchers. Journal of Documentation 66(3): 409–433. doi:10.1108/00220411011038476
- Pesch, O. 2011. Perfecting COUNTER and SUSHI to achieve reliable usage analysis. The Serials Librarian 61(3/4), 353–365. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2011.617294
- Revised Guidelines. 2006. Revised guidelines for statistical measures of usage of web-based information resources (last modified October 4, 2006). http://icolc.net/statement/revised-guidelines-statistical-measures-usage-web-based-information-resources
- Shepherd, P. T. 2004. COUNTER: Towards reliable vendor usage statistics. VINE 34(4): 184–189. doi:10.1108/03055720410570975
- Shepherd, P. T. 2006. COUNTER: Usage statistics for performance measurement. Performance Measurement and Metrics 7(3): 142–152. doi:10.1108/14678040610713101
- Shepherd, P. T., and D. Davis. 2002. Electronic metrics, performance measures, and statistics for publishers and libraries: Building common ground and standards. portal: Libraries and the Academy 2(4): 659–663. doi:10.1353/pla.2002.0087
- Stubbings, R. and Y. Hamblin. 2004. How to make your e-resources earn their keep. Serials; The Journal for the Serials Community 17(1): 25–30. http://uksg.metapress.com/content/ekjtu699em1tyy6j/fulltext.pdf (accessed March 13, 2014).
- Sugarman, T., S. Krueger, and L. Kelly. 2011. Evaluating usage of non-text resources: What the COUNTER statistics don’t tell you. The Serials Librarian 60(1/4): 83–97. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2011.556445
- Suseela, V. J. 2011. Application of usage statistics for assessing the use of e-journals in University of Hyderabad: A case study. The Electronic Library 29(6): 751–761. doi:10.1108/02640471111187980
- Tripathi, M., and V. K. J. Jeevan. 2013. A selective review of research on e-resource usage in academic libraries. Library Review 62(3): 134–156. doi:10.1108/00242531311329473
- Welker, J. 2012. Counting on COUNTER: The current state of e-resources usage data in libraries. Computer in Libraries 32(9). http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov12/Welker–Counting-on-COUNTER.shtml (accessed April 15, 2014).