Policies, profits, networks, or duty? Donors’ motivations for contributing to parties and interest groups

References

• Andersen, E. A., & Jennings, M. K. (2010, January). Exploring multi-issue activism. PS: Political Science and Politics, 43(1), 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Schaffner, B. F. (2017). CCES common content, 2016. Harvard Dataverse, V4. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GDF6Z0
   Google Scholar
• Arke, R. (2019, January 24). Will Patriot Pass be the GOP’s answer to ActBlue? Open secrets blog. Retrieved from https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/01/patriot-pass-be-the-gops-actblue/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. E. (2016). Individual party donors: True allies or free agents? Party Politics, 24(5), 577–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. E. (2018). Are federal PACs obsolete? Interest Groups and Advocacy, 7(2), 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. E. (2019). The partisan and policy motivations of political donors seeking surrogate representation in House elections. Political behavior. Retrieved from https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/the-partisan-and-policy-motivations-of-political-donors-seeking-/16458054
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. (2016). Donation motivations: Testing theories of access and ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 69(I), 148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Powell, L., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious money: Fundraising and contributing in presidential nomination campaigns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cigler, A. (2011). Interest groups and the financing of the 2008 elections. In D. B. Magleby & A. Corrado (Eds.), Financing the 2008 election (pp. 249–289). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, A. (2019). The regulatory environment of the 2016 election. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2016 election (pp. 55–85). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyre, D., & Kolodny, R. (2014). Party money in the 2012 elections. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2012 election (pp. 175–214). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyre, D., & Kolodny, R. (2019). Party money in the 2016 election. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2016 election (pp. 251–298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. London, England: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Francia, P. L., Green, J. C., Herrnson, P. S., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (2003). The financers of congressional elections. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francia, P. L., Green, J. C., Herrnson, P. S., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (2005). Limousine liberals and corporate conservatives: The financial constituencies of the Democratic and Republican parties. Social Science Quarterly, 86(4), 761–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpel, J. C., Lee, F. E., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2008). The check is in the mail: Inter-district funding flows in congressional elections. Journal of Politics, 52(2), 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, M. (2012). The not-so-special interests: Interest groups, public representation, and American governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmer, M. J., & Kalkan, K. O. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 263–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell, H. J. G., & Monson, J. Q. (2014). Campaign targets and messages in direct mail fundraising. Political Behavior, 36, 359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaney, M., Masket, S., Miller, J., & Strolovitch, D. (2012). Polarized networks: The organizational affiliations of national party convention delegates. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(12), 1654–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnson, P. (2009). The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections. Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1207–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershey, M. (2015). Party politics in America (Sixteenth ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M., & Larson, B. (2010). Parties, politics, and public policy in America (Eleventh ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasniunas, N. T., Rozell, M. J., & Keckler, C. (2017). Interest groups, super PACs, and independent expenditures. In R. J. Semiatin (Ed.), Campaigns on the cutting edge (pp. 93–110). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koger, G., Masket, S., & Noel, H. (2009). Partisan webs: Information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 633–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, R. (1998). Pursuing majorities: Congressional campaign committees in American politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Raja, R. (2008). Small change: Money, political parties, and campaign finance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Raja, R., & Schaffner, B. (2015). Campaign finance and political polarization: When purists prevail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, C., & Overby, P. (2019, July 1). Red shift: How Republicans plan to catch Democrats in online fundraising. NPR. Politics Section. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2019/07/01/736990455/red-shift-how-republicans-plan-to-catch-democrats-in-online-fundraising
   Google Scholar
• Magleby, D. B., & Goodliffe, J. (2014). Interest groups. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2012 election (pp. 215–261). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magleby, D. B. (2019). Change and continuity in the financing of the 2016 U.S. federal election. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2016 election (pp. 1–53). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Magleby, D. B., & Goodliffe, J. (2019). Interest groups in the 2016 election. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2016 election (pp. 87–130). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magleby, D. B., Goodliffe, J., & Olsen, J. A. (2018). Who donates in campaigns?: The importance of message, messenger, medium, and structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malbin, M., & Glavin, B. (2018). CFI guide to money in federal elections: 2016 in historical context. Retrieved from http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/federal/2016Report/CFIGuide_MoneyinFederalElections.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Open Secrets (2019). Joint fundraising committees. Center for responsive politics. Retrieved from https://www.opensecrets.org/jfc/
   Google Scholar
• Page, B., Bartels, L. M., & Seawright, J. (2013). Democracy and the policy preferences of wealthy Americans. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 51–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, T. (2017). Political parties—reinvigorated. In R. J. Semiatin (Ed.), Campaigns on the cutting edge (pp. 93–110). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., & Hall, R. (2019). Financing the 2016 congressional election. In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), Financing the 2016 election (pp. 217–250). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J., Schaffner, B., & La Raja, R. (2016). Financial capacity and strategic investors in an era of deregulation (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/sites/default/files/schaffner_financial_capacity_and_strategic_investors_in_an_era_of_deregulation.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J., Schaffner, B., & La Raja, R. (2018). Detecting and understanding donors’ strategies in midterm elections. Political Research Quarterly, 71(3), 503–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K., & Tierney, J. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Sides, J., Shaw, D., Grossman, M., & Lipsitz, K. (2019). Campaigns and elections (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, D. (2014, October 9). How ActBlue became a powerful force in fund-raising. The Upshot, NYTimes. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/09/upshot/how-actblue-became-a-powerful-force-in-fund-raising.html
   Google Scholar