336
Views
666
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical

Pages 205-228 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • APPLE, MICHAEL W. “The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict.” In Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists, Edited by William Pinar. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 95–119.
  • BODE, BOYD H. “On curriculum construction.” Curriculum Theory Network 5, no. 1 (1975): 39–59. Reprinted from: Boyd H. Bode. Modern educational theories. New York: Macmillan, 1927.
  • CHOMSKY, NOAM. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1965.
  • CONNELLY, F. MICHAEL. “The functions of curriculum development.” Interchange 3, nos. 2–3 (1972): 161–77.
  • DANIELS, LEROI B. “What is the language of the practical?” Curriculum Theory Network 4, no. 4 (1975): 237–61.
  • DILTHEY, WILHELM. Gesammelte schrifte. Leipzig: Teubner, 1914.
  • DILTHEY, WILHELM.. Pattern and meaning in history, Edited by Hans P. Rickman. London: Heinemann, 1962.
  • FREIRE, PAULO. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.
  • GADAMER, HANS-GEORG. Truth and method. New York: The Seabury Press, 1975.
  • HABERMAS, JURGEN. “Toward a theory of communicative competence.” In Recent sociology no. 2: Patterns of communicative behavior, Edited by Hans Peter Dreitzel. New York: Macmillan, 1970, pp. 114–48.
  • HABERMAS, JURGEN.. Theory and practice. London: Heinemann, 1974.
  • HEIDEGGER, MARTIN. Being and time. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
  • HUEBNER, DWAYNE. “Curricular language and classroom meanings.” In Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists, Edited by William Pinar. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 217–36.
  • HUME, DAVID. An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1955.
  • HYMES, DELL, ed. Reinventing anthropology. New York: Pantheon, 1973.
  • KLIEBARD, HERBERT M. “The rise of scientific curriculum making and its aftermath.” Curriculum Theory Network 5, no. 1 (1975): 27–38.
  • MACDONALD, JAMES B. “Curriculum and human interests.” In Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists, Edited by William Pinar. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 283–94.
  • MCHUGH, PETER; RAFFEL, STANLEY; FOSS, DANIEL C.; AND BLUM, ALAN F. On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.
  • O'NEILL, JOHN. Making sense together: An introduction to wild sociology. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
  • PALMER, RICHARD E. Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.
  • PARSONS, TALCOTT. The structure of social action. New York: The Free Press, 1949.
  • RADNITZKY, GERARD. Contemporary schools of metascience. Chicago: H. Regnery, 1972.
  • ROSZAK, THEODORE. The making of a counter culture. New York: Doubleday, 1969.
  • SCHUTZ, ALFRED. Collected papers, Volume I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
  • SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review 78, no. 1 (1969): 1–24.
  • SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. “The practical: Arts of eclectic.” School Review 79, no. 4 (1971): 493–542.
  • SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. “The practical 3: Translation into curriculum.” School Review 81, no. 4 (1973): 501–22.
  • SHAULL, RICHARD. Foreword to Pedagogy of the oppressed, by Paulo Freire. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.
  • SHILS, EDWARD A., and FINCH, HENRY A., eds. Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1949.
  • THOMAS, WILLIAM I. Social behavior and personality, Edited by Edmund H. Volkhart. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1951.
  • VAN MANEN, MAX J. “Toward a phenomenology of instruction.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta, 1973.
  • VAN MANEN, MAX J.. “An exploration of alternative research orientations in social education.” Theory and Research in Social Education 3, no. 1 (1975): 1–28.
  • WALKER, DECKER F. “The curriculum field in formation.” Curriculum Theory Network 4, no. 4 (1975): 263–80. (a)
  • WALKER, DECKER F.. “Straining to lift ourselves.” Curriculum Theory Network 5, no. 1 (1975): 3–25. (b)
  • WALKER, DECKER F., and SCHAFFARZICK, JON. “Comparing curricula.” Review of Educational Research 44, no. 1 (1974): 83–111.
  • WINCH, PETER. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.