REFERENCES
- ASHTON, DORE. A reading of modem art. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University Press, 1969.
- BAKER, ELIZABETH. “Tales of Hoffmann: The ‘Renate Series.’” Art News 71 (November 1972): 39–41.
- BANTOCK, G. H. “Educational research: A criticism.” Harvard Educational Review 31, no. 3 (Summer 1961): 264–80.
- CASWELL, HOLLIS. “Sources of confusion in curriculum theory.” In Toward improved curriculum theory, edited by Vergil Herrick and Ralph Tyler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
- DEWEY, JOHN. Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn Books, [1934] 1959.
- DUNCAN, JAMES K., and FRYMIER, JACK R. “Explorations in the systematic study of curriculum.” Theory into Practice 6, no. 4 (October 1967): 180–99.
- ECKER, DAVID W. “The artistic process as qualitative problem solving.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 21 (Spring 1963): 283–90.
- EISNER, ELLIOT W. “Emerging models of educational evaluation.” School Review 80, no. 4 (August 1972): 573–90.
- EISNER, ELLIOT W.. “The perceptive eye: Toward the reformation of educational evaluation.” Invited address to the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., March 31, 1975.
- HUEBNER, DWAYNE. “Curricular language and classroom meanings.” In Language and meaning, edited by James B. Macdonald and Robert R. Leeper. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1966.
- LANGER, SUSANNE K. Problems of art. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1957.
- MACDONALD, JAMES B. “Myths about instruction.” Educational Leadership 22, no. 7 (May 1965): 571–617.
- MACDONALD, JAMES B.. “Curriculum theory.” Journal of Educational Research 64, no. 5 (January 1971): 196–200.
- MANN, JOHN S. “Curriculum criticism.” Teachers College Record 71, no. 1 (September 1969): 27–40.
- PEPPER, STEPHEN C. The basis of criticism in the arts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1945.
- SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review 78, no. 1 (November 1969): 1–24.
- SHULMAN, LEE S. “Reconstruction of educational research.” Review of Educational Research 40, no. 3 (June 1970): 371–96.
- SOCIAL SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM. Social studies curriculum materials data book. Boulder, Colo.: S.S.E.C., Inc., 1971.
- VALLANCE, ELIZABETH. “Aesthetic criticism and curriculum description.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, July 1975.
- VALLANCE, ELIZABETH. “The application of aesthetic criticism to curriculum materials: Arguments and issues.” Paper presented at AERA conference, San Francisco, April 1976.
- WALKER, DECKER F. “A naturalistic model for curriculum development.” School Review 80, no. 1 (November 1971): 51–65.
- WESTBURY, IAN. “Curriculum evaluation.” Review of Educational Research 40, no. 2 (April 1970): 239–60.