Research on Teacher Thinking

REFERENCES

• ANDERSON, BEVERLY L. “Differences in Teachers' judgment policies for varying numbers of verbal and numerical cues.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 19, no. 1 (June 1977): 68–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, VERNON E. Principles and procedures for curriculum improvement. New York: Ronald Press, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• BADER, LOIS, et al. “Observational studies of clinical problem solving behavior in reading diagnosis.” Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• BERLINER, DAVID C. “Developing a sample of teachers for intensive analysis of classroom teaching.” Mimeographed. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• BLOOM, BENJAMIN S. “The thought processes of students in discussion.” In Accent on teaching: Experiments in general education, edited by Sidney J. French. New York: Harper Brothers, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• BRIDGES, CHARLES M.; WARE, WILLIAM B.; BROWN, BOB BURTON; AND GREENWOOD, GORDON. “Characteristics of best and worst college teachers.” Science Education 55, no. 4 (1971): 545–53.
   Google Scholar
• BROPHY, JERE E., and GOOD, THOMAS L. Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• BUSSIS, ANNE M.; CHITTENDEN, EDWARD A.; AND AMAREL, MARIANNE. Beyond Surface curriculum. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• CASWELL, HOLLIS L., and CAMBELL, DOAK S. Curriculum development. New York: American Book Company, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK, CHRISTOPHER M., and JOYCE, BRUCE R. “Teacher decision making and teacher effectiveness.” Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Washington, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK, CHRISTOPHER M., and JOYCE, BRUCE R., and PETERSON, PENELOPE L. “Teacher stimulated recall of interactive decisions.” Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• CLARK, CHRISTOPHER M., and JOYCE, BRUCE R., and PETERSON, PENELOPE L., ROBERT J. “Identification of salient features of language arts activities.” Mimeographed. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• DUFFY, GERALD. “A study of teacher conceptions of reading.” Paper presented to the National Reading Conference, New Orleans, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• DUNKIN, MICHAEL J., and BIDDLE, BRUCE J. The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• EISNER, ELLIOT W. “Educational objectives: Help or hinderance?” School Review 75, no. 3 (Autumn 1967): 250–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOODLAD, JOHN, et al. Behind the classroom door. Worthington, Ohio: Charles A. Jones, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• GWYNN, J. MINOR. Curriculum, principles and social trends. New York: MacMillan, 1943.
   Google Scholar
• HAMMOND, KENNETH R. “Computer graphics as an aid to learning.”Science 172, no. 398 (May 1971): 903–08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISAACSON, ROBERT L., et al. “Dimensions of student evaluation of teaching.” Journal of Educational Psychology 55, no. 6 (December 1964): 344–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JACKSON, PHILIP W. The way teaching is. Washington: National Education Association, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• JANESICK, VALERIE. “An ethnographic study of a teacher's classroom perspective.” Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSON, DONALD M. The psychology of thought and judgment. New York: Harper Row,1955.
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSON, DONALD M.. Systematic introduction to the psychology of thinking. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• JOYCE, BRUCE R., and HAROOTUNIAN, BERJ. “Teaching as problem solving.” Journal of Teacher Education 15, no. 4 (December 1964): 420–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOYCE, BRUCE R., and HAROOTUNIAN, BERJ., KATHLEEN “Thought and action in the classroom: The South Bay study.” Mimeographed. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• KAGAN, NORMAN; KRATHWOHL, DAVID R.; GOLDBERG, ALAN D.; AND CAMPBELL, ROBERT J. Studies in human interaction: Interpersonal process recall stimulated by videotape. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• KRUG, EDWARD A. Curriculum planning. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• MACDONALD, JAMES B. “Myths about instruction.” Educational Leadership 22, no. 8 (May 1965): 571–76, 609–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MACDONALD, JAMES B., ESTHER. Reschooling society: A conceptual model. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• MARLAND, PERCY W. “A study of Teachers' interactive thoughts.” Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alberta, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• MARX, RONALD W. “Teacher judgments of students' cognitive and affective outcomes.” Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• MARX, RONALD W., and PETERSON, PENELOPE L. “The nature of teacher decision making.” Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., 1975.
   Google Scholar
• MEDLEY, DONALD. “Concepts of effective teaching and research in teacher effectiveness.” In Conceptions of teaching, edited by Penelope L. Peterson and Herbert J. Walberg. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• MONDOL, MERLYN M. “The paramorphic representation of teacher decision making as a predictor of inquiry performance.” Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• MORINE, GRETA. “A study of teacher planning.” BTES technical report 76-3-1. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• MORINE, GRETA., and VALLANCE, ELIZABETH. “A study of teacher and pupil perceptions of classroom interaction.” BTES technical report 75-11-6. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION. Teaching as clinical information processing. Report of panel 6, National Conference on Studies in Teaching, Washington, D.C., 1975. (a)
   Google Scholar
• NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION.. Theory development. Report of panel 10, National Conference on Studies in Teaching, Washington D.C., 1975. (b)
   Google Scholar
• NEWELL, ALLEN. “Judgment and its representation: An introduction.” In Formal representation of human judgment, edited by B. Kleinmentz. New York: John Wiley, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• PETERSON, PENELOPE L; MARX, RONALD W.; AND CLARK, CHRISTOPHER M. “Teacher planning, teacher behavior, and student achievement.” American Educational Research Journal, in press.
   Google Scholar
• POPHAM, W. JAMES, and BAKER, EVA L. Systematic instruction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• RAPPOPORT, LEON, and SUMMERS, DAVID A. Human judgment and social interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• ROSENSHINE, BARAK. Teaching behaviours and student achievement. London: National Foundation for Educational Research, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• ROSENSHINE, BARAK., and FURST, NORMA. “Research on teacher performance criteria.” In Research on teacher education: A symposium, edited by B. Othanel Smith. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• SAYLOR, JOHN G. and ALEXANDER, WILLIAM M. Planning curriculum for schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• SHAVELSON, RICHARD J. “What is the basic teaching skill?” Journal of Teacher Education 24, no. 2 (Summer 1973): 144–51.
   Google Scholar
• SHAVELSON, RICHARD J., TONIA. “Teachers' sensitivity to the reliability of information in making pedagogical decisions.” American Educational Research Journal 14, no. 2 (Spring 1977): 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHULMAN, LEE S, and ELSTEIN, ARTHUR S. “Studies of problem solving, judgment, and decision making.” In Review of research in education, vol. 3, edited by Frederick N. Kerlinger. Itaska, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• TABA, HILDA. Curriculum development, theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• TAYLOR, PHILIP H. How teachers plan their courses. Slough, Bucks.: National Foundation for Educational Research, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• TVERSKY, AMOS, and KAHNEMAN, DANIEL. “Judgment under uncertainty: Hueris-tics and biases.” Science 185, no. 4157 (September 1974): 1124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TYLER, RALPH W. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• VINSONHALER, JOHN F,; WAGNER, CHRISTIAN S.; AND ELSTEIN, ARTHUR S. “The inquiry theory: An information processing approach to clinical problem solving.” Mimeographed. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• WILSON, STEPHEN. “The use of ethnographic techniques in educational research.” Review of Educational Research 47, no. 2 (Spring 1977): 245–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YINGER, ROBERT J. “A study of teacher planning: Description and theory development using ethnographic and information processing methods.” Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• ZAHORIK, JOHN A. “The effect of planning on teaching.” Elementary School Journal 71, no. 3 (December 1970): 143–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZAHORIK, JOHN A., “Teachers' planning models.” Educational Leadership 33, no. 2 (November 1975); 134–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar