Tools for Curriculum Research and Development: Potential Contributions from Cognitive Science

REFERENCES

• ANDERSON, JOHN R. Language, memory and thought. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, JOHN R., and BOWER, GORDON H. Human associative memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, RICHARD C. “The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise.” In Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, edited by Richard C. Anderson, Rand J. Spiro, and William E. Montague. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, RICHARD C., DIANE L.; and GOETZ, ERNEST T. “Frameworks for comprehending discourse.” American Educational Research Journal 14, no. 4 (Fall 1977): 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, RICHARD C., DIANE L.; and GOETZ, ERNEST T., WILLIAM E., eds. Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• ATKIN, J. A. “An information processing model of learning and problem solving.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• AUSUBEL, DAVID P. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• AUSUBEL, DAVID P. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• BRANSFORD, JOHN D., and JOHNSON, MARCIA K. “Considerations of some problems of comprehension.” In Visual information processing, Edited by William G. Chase. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• BROUDY, HARRY s. “The life uses of schooling as a field for research.” In Philosophical redirection of educational research, Edited by Lawrence G. Thomas. Seventy-first Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pt. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• BRUNER, JEROME S. The process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• COLLINS, ALLAN M., and QUILLIAN, M. ROSS. “Retrieval time from semantic memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, no. 2 (1969): 240–247.
   Google Scholar
• Earth Science Curriculum Project. Investigating the earth. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• EISNER, ELLIOT W. “Instructional and expressive objectives.” In Instructional objectives, edited by W. James Popham, Elliot W. Eisner, Howard J. Sullivan, and Louise L. Tyler. AERA Monographs on curriculum evaluation, no. 3. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• FARNHAM-DIGGORY, SYLVIA. Cognitive processes in education. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• FARNHAM-DIGGORY, SYLVIA.. “Toward a theory of instructional growth.” In Cognition and instruction, Edited by David Klahr. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• FILLMORE, CHARLES J. “The case for case.” In Universals in Linguistic theory, Edited by Emmon W. Bach and Robert T. Harms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• FRASE, L. T. “Advances in research and theory in instructional technology.” In Review of research in education, no. 3, Edited by Frederick N. Kerlinger. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• FREDERIKSEN, CARL H. “Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse.” Cognitive Psychology 7, no. 3 (1975): 371–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAGNE, ROBERT M., and BRIGGS, LESLIF. J. Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• GOWIN, D. BOB. “The structure of knowledge.” Educational Theory 20, no. 4 (Fall 1970): 319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOWIN, D. BOB.. “Teachers need knowledge of knowledge.” Cornell Chronicle, 21 April 1977.
   Google Scholar
• GOWIN, D. BOB.. “The domain of education.” Mimeographed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• GREENO, JAMES G. “Cognitive objectives of instruction: Theory of knowledge for problem solving and answering questions.” In Cognition and instruction, Edited by David Klahr. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• HAYES, JOHN R. “It's the thought that counts: New approaches to educational theory.” In Cognition and instruction, Edited by David Klahr. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• HUEBNER, DWAYNE E. “The moribund curriculum field: Its wake and our work.” Curriculum Inquiry 6, no. 2 (1976): 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KINTSCH, WALTER. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• KLAHR, DAVID, ed. Cognition and instruction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• LINDSAY, PETER H., and NORMAN, DONALD A. Human information processing. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• LURIA, ALEKSANDR R. The mind of a mnemonist. Translated by Lynn Solotaroff. New York: Basic Books, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• MACDONALD-ROSS, M. “Behavioral objectives: A critical review.” In Curriculum design, edited by Michael Golby, Jane Greenwald, and Ruth West. New York: Wiley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• MEYER, BONNIE J. F. “The organization of prose and its effects on memory.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, GEORGE A. “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.” Psychological Review, no. 63 (1956): 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• MINSKY, MARVIN. “A framework for representing knowledge.” In The psychology of computer vision, Edited by Patrick H. Winston. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• NEISSER, ULRIC. Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• NEWELL, ALLEN, and SIMON, HERBERT A. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• NORMAN, DONALD A., and BOBROW, DANIEL G. “On the role of active memory processes in perception and cognition.” In The structure of human memory, Edited by Charles N. Cofer. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• NORMAN, DONALD A., and BOBROW, DANIEL G., ALBERT L. “Comments on learning: Schemata and memory representation.” In Cognition and instruction, edited by David Klahr. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• NORMAN, DONALD A., and BOBROW, DANIEL G., ALBERT L., and RUMELHART, DAVID E. Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• NOVAK, JOSEPH D. A theory of education. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• PAIVIO, ALLAN. Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• PAIVIO, ALLAN.. “Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.” Memory and Cognition 3 (1975): 635–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARKER, JOHN C., and RUBIN, LOUIS J. Process as content: Curriculum design and the application of knowledge. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• PINES, A. LEON. “Scientific concept learning in children: The effect of prior knowledge on resulting cognitive structure subsequent to A-T instruction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• PINES, A. LEON., GEORGE J.; and VAN KIRK, J. The clinical interview: A method for evaluating cognitive structure. Curriculum Series Research Report, no. 6. Ithaca, N.Y.: Department of Education, Cornell University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• POPHAM, W. JAMES. “Probing the validity of arguments against behavioral objectives.” In Instructional Objectives, edited by W. James Popham, Elliot W. Eisner, Howard J. Sullivan, and Louise L. Tyler. AERA Monographs on curriculum evaluation, no. 3. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• POSNER, GEORGE J., and the Cognitive Structure Group, eds. The assessment of cognitive structure. Curriculum Series Research Report, no. 5. Ithaca, N.Y.: Department of Education, Cornell University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• POSNER, GEORGE J., and the Cognitive Structure Group, eds., and RUDNITSKY, ALAN N. Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. New York: Longman, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• POSNER, GEORGE J., and the Cognitive Structure Group, eds., and RUDNITSKY, ALAN N., and STRIKE, KENNETH A. “A categorization scheme for principles of sequencing content.” Review of Educational Research 46, no. 4 (Fall 1976): 665–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PYLYSHYN, ZENON W. “What the mind's eye tells the brain: A critique of mental imagery.” Psychological Bulletin 80, no. 1 (1973): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QUILLIAN, M. ROSS. “The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 12 (1969): 459–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIPS, LANCE J.; SHOBEN, EDWARD J.; and SMITH, EDWARD E. “Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, no. 1 (1973): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• ROSCH, ELEANOR H. “Natural categories.” Cognitive Psychology 4, no. 3 (1973): 328–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROWELL, R. M. “Concept mapping: Evaluation of children's science concepts following audio-tutorial instruction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• RUMELHART, DAVID E. “The structure of stories.” In Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, Edited by Daniel G. Bobrow and Allan Collins. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• RUMELHART, DAVID E.. An introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• RUMELHART, DAVID E., and ORTONY, ANDREW. “The representation of knowledge in memory.” In Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, edited by Richard C. Anderson, Rand J. Spiro, and William E. Montague. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• SCHANK, ROGER C. “The structure of episodes in memory.” In Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, Edited by Daniel G. Bobrow and Allan Collins. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• SCRAGG, GREG. W. “Answering questions about process.” In Explorations in cognition, edited by Donald A. Norman and David E. Rumelhart. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• SENESH, LAWRENCE. Our working world: New paths in social science curriculum design. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• STEWARI, J. H. “Cognitive structure in college biology students: An investigation of convergent validity of assessment techniques.” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• STEWARI, J. H., JOSEPH D.; and ROWELL, R. M. “Concept maps: A tool for use in biology teaching.” American Biology Teacher (in press).
   Google Scholar
• STRIKE, KENNETH A. “Cognitive structure: Nature and measurement.” In The assessment of cognitive structure, Edited by George J. Posner and the Cognitive Structure Group. Curriculum Series Research Report, no. 5. Ithaca, N.Y.: Department of Education, Cornell University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• STRIKE, KENNETH A., and POSNER, GEORGE J. “Statements of educational objectives: Form and function.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 1974.
   Google Scholar
• STRIKE, KENNETH A., and POSNER, GEORGE J.. “Epistemological perspectives on conceptions of curriculum organization and learning.” In Review of research in education, vol. 4, Edited by Lee S. Shulman. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• TULVING, ENDEL. “The effects of presentation and recall of material in free recall learning.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6, no. 2 (1967): 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• TULVING, ENDEL. “Episodic and semantic memory.” In Organization of memory, Edited by Endel Tulving and Wayne Donaldson. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• WALKER, DECKER F. “The structure of goals, knowledge and curricula.” Paper prepared for the NIE Invitational Conference on School Organization and Its Effects, San Diego, January 1978.
   Google Scholar
• WEIL, MARSHA, and JOYCE, BRUCE R. Information processing models of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• WEINSTEIN, GERALD, and FANTINI, MARIO D., eds. Toward humanistic education: A curriculum of affect. New York: Praeger, 1970.
   Google Scholar