“Spiteful Tracts Compete Against Bloodless Surveys”. The Use of Reading Research

REFERENCES

• ANTONIONI, MICHELANGELO. Blow-up. Hollywood, Calif.: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• BARTON, ALLEN H., and WILDER, DAVID E. “Research and practice in the teaching of reading: A progress report.” In Innovation in education, edited by Matthew B. Miles. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• BURNS, PAUL C. “Reading research that has influenced reading instruction: 1960–1974.” School Media Quarterly 3, no. 2 (Winter 1975): 142–148.
   Google Scholar
• CALFEE, ROBERT C., and DRUM, PRISCILLA A. “Learning to read: Theory, research, and practice.” Curriculum Inquiry 8, no. 3 (Fall 1978): 183–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHALL, JEANNE S. “The history of controlled vocabulary.” In Reading for effective living: International Reading Association proceedings, vol. 3, edited by Allen J. Figurel. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• CHALL, JEANNE S.. Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• CLIFFORD, GERALDINE J. “A history of the impact of research on teaching.” In Second handbook of research on teaching, edited by Robert M. V. Travers. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• COLEMAN, EDMUND B. “Developing a technology of written instruction: Some determiners of the complexity of prose.” In Verbal learning research and the technology of written instruction, edited by Ernst Z. Rothkopf and Paul E. Johnson. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• CRONBACH, LEE J., and SUPPES, PATRICK. Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. New York: Macmillan, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• DEWEY, JOHN. Sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright, 1929.
   Google Scholar
• GATES, ARTHUR I. Interest and ability in reading. New York: Macmillan, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• GATES, ARTHUR I.. “Vocabulary control in basal reading material.” Reading Teacher 15, no. 4 (November 1961): 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• GOODMAN, KENNETH S. “Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics.” Reading Research Quarterly 5, no. 1 (Fall 1969): 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOODMAN, KENNETH S.. “Influences of the visual peripheral field in reading.” Research in the Teaching of English 9, no. 2 (Fall 1975): 210–222.
   Google Scholar
• GUTHRIE, JOHN T. “Research views: Research and practice.” Reading Teacher 30, no. 2 (November 1976): 198–201.
   Google Scholar
• HARRIS, ALBERT J. “Practical applications of reading research.” Reading Teacher 29, no. 6 (March 1976): 559–565.
   Google Scholar
• HODGKINSON, HAROLD L. “Action research: A critique.” Journal of Educational Sociology 31, no. 4 (December 1957): 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• JACKSON, PHILLIP W. Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSTON, BERNARD, ed. The literature of learning: A teacher's anthology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• LORTIE, DANIEL C. “The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching.” In The semi-professions and their organization, edited by Amitai Etzioni. New York: Free Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• ROTHKOPF, ERNST Z. “Experiments on mathemagenic behavior and the technology of written instruction.” In Verbal learning research and the technology of written instruction, edited by Ernst Z. Rothkopf and Paul E. Johnson. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• SCHUTZ, RICHARD. “The nature of educational development.” Journal of Research and Development in Education 3, no. 2 (Winter 1970): 39–64.
   Google Scholar
• SHULMAN, LEE S. “Reconstruction of educational research.” Review of Educational Research 40, no. 4 (October 1970): 371–396.
   Google Scholar
• SHUMSKY, ABRAHAM. “Cooperation in action research: A rationale.” Journal of Educational Sociology 30, no. 4 (December 1956): 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• SINGER, HARRY. “Research that should have made a difference.” Elementary English 47, no. 1 (January 1970): 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• THORNDIKE, EDWARD L. The teacher's word book. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1921.
   Google Scholar
• UNITED STATES OFFICE OF EDUCATION. Educational research and development in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• WILDER, DAVID E. “The reading experts: A case study of the failure to institutionalize an applied science of education.” Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• WILLIAMS, JOANNA P. “Building perceptual and cognitive strategies into a reading curriculum.” In Toward a psychology of reading, edited by Arthur S. Reber and Don L. Scarborough. New York: Wiley, 1977.
   Google Scholar