REFERENCES
- “Bibliography of Curriculum Texts.” Newsletter of the SIG on the Creation and Utilization of Curriculum Knowledge 16 (December 1979).
- BOOTH, WAYNK C. Critical understanding, the powers and limits of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
- FINKELSTEIN, JAMES H., and WILLIAMS, C. RAY. “Letter to the editor.” Educational Researcher 8, no. 9 (October 1979): 24, 25.
- GREENE, MAXINE. “Letter to the editor.” Educational Researcher 8, no. 9 (October 1979): 25.
- HUEBNER, DWAYNE. “The moribund curriculum field: Its wake and our work.” Curriculum Inquiry 6, no. 2 (1976): 153–167.
- PINAR, WILLIAM F. “Notes on the curriculum field 1978.” Educational Researcher 7, no. 8 (September 1978): 5–12.
- PINAR, WILLIAM F.. “Letter to the editor.” Educational Researcher 8, no. 9 (October 1979): 6, 24.
- SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review 78 (1969): 1–23.
- SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1970.
- SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. “The Practical: Arts of Eclectic.” School Review (August 1971): 493–542.
- SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. “The practical 3: Translation into curriculum.” School Review (August 1973): 501–522.
- TANNER, DANIEL, and TANNER, LAUREL N. “Emancipation from research: The reconceptualist prescription.” Educational Researcher 8, no. 6(June 1979): 8–12.