Conceptual Change Analysis: Implications for Mathematics and Curriculum

REFERENCES

• BOOTH. WAYNK. Critical understanding: The power and limits of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• BOYKR. CARI., The history of calculus and its conceptual development. New York: Dover Publications, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• CHERRYHOLMES. CLEO. Social knowledge and citizenship education. Curriculum inquiry 10, no. 2 (June 1980): 151–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIEUDONNE JEAN A. “Should we teach modern mathematics?” American Scientist 61 (January-February 1973): 16–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELKANS. Y. “The historical roots of modern physics.” In Proceedings of the lnternational School of Physics, edited by C. Winer. New York: Academic, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• HERSH. REUBEN. “Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics.” Advances in Mathematics 31, no. 1 (January 1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUEBNER. DWYANE. “The moribund curriculum field: Its wake and our work.” Curriculum Inquiry 6, no. 2 (1976): 153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAPUT. JAMES. “Mathematics and learning: Roots of epistemological status.” In Cognitive process instruction, edited by Jack Lochhead and John Clement. Philadelphia, Franklin Institute Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• KLEIN. JACOB. Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• KUHN. THOMASS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• LAKATOS. I “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs.” In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrove. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• LAKATOS. I. Proofs and refutations: The Logic of mathematical discovery. London: Cambridge University Press, 1976a.
   Google Scholar
• LAKATOS. I. “A renaissance of empiricism in the recent philosophy of mathematics?” British Journal of Philosophy of Science 27 (1976b): 201–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PETERS. R.S. Education and the education of teachers. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• PETRIE. HUGHG. “Evolutionary rationality: Or can learning theory survive in the jungle of conceptual change?” Philosophy of Education Proceedings, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• POPPER, KARI. Objective knowledge. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• REID. WILLIAM. “Practical reasoning and curriculum theory: In search of a new paradigm.” Curriculum Inquiry 9, no. 3 (1979): 187–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHEFFI ER. ISRAEL. “University scholarship and the education of teachers.” Teachers College Record 70, no. 1 (1968): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH. “The practical: Arts of eclectic.” School Review (August 1971): 493–542.
   Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH.. “The practical three: Translation into curriculum.” School Review (August 1973).
   Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH.. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review (November 1969): 1–23
   Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH.… “What do scientists do?” Behavioral Science 5 (1960): 1–27
   Google Scholar
• SHULMAN. LEE. “Psychology and mathematics education.” NSSE Yearbook 69 (1970).
   Google Scholar
• SHULMAN. LEE., ANDTAMIR, PINCHAS. “Research on teaching in the natural sciences.” Review of Research in Education, edited by Fred Kerlinger. Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers, Inc., 1973.
   Google Scholar
• SOLTIS. JONAS. “The concept of education.” Unpublished paper, Columbia University, February 1979.
   Google Scholar
• SPENGLER, OSWALD. “The decline of the West.” In Form and actuality. New York: Knopf, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• STRIKE. KENNETH, and POSNER. GEORGE. “Epistemological perspecting on conceptions of curriculum organization and learning.” Review of Research in Education IV, edited by Lee Shulman. Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers, Inc., 1976.
   Google Scholar
• THOM. RENE. “Modern mathematics: An educational and philosophic error?” American Scientist 59 (1971): 695–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TOEPLITZ. OTTO. The calculus: A genetic approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• TOULMIN. STEPHEN. Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• UNGURU. SABETAI. “On the need to rewrite the history of Greek mathematics.” In Archive for the history of exact sciences 15, no. 1 (1975).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILDER. R.I. Evolution of mathematical concepts. New York: Wiley, 1968.
   Google Scholar