REFERENCES
- BEREITER, C., and KURLAND, M. A constructive look at follow through results. Interchange, 12(1981): 1–21.
- BERMAN, P. Toward an implementation paradigm. In R. Lehming and M. Kane (Eds.), Improving schools, Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1981.
- BERMAN, P., and MCLAUGHLIN, M. Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. VII, Factors Affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation, 1977.
- CRANDALL, D. People, policies and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement (ten volumes) Andover, Massachusetts, THE NETWORK, Inc., 1982.
- FULLAN, M. The meaning of educational change, New York: Teachers College Press, Toronto, OISE Press, 1982.
- GERSTEN, G., CARNINE, D., ZUREF, L., and CRONIN, D. Measuring implementation of educational innovations in a broad context. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association annual meeting, 1981.
- HALL, G., and LOUCKS, S. A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 14(1977): 263–76.
- HALL, G., and LOUCKS, S. The concept of innovation configurations: An approach to addressing program adaptation. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association annual meeting, 1981.
- HODGES, W. Follow Through: Forces for change in the primary schools, Ypsilanti, Michigan, High Scope Press, 1980.
- HOUSE, E. No simple answer: Critique of the “follow through” evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 48(1978): 128–160.
- KASKOWITZ, D. & STALLINGS, J. “An assessment of program implementation in project follow through”. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, 1975.
- LEITHWOOD, K. and MONTGOMERY, D. “Evaluating program implementation” Evaluation Quarterly, 4(1980): 193–214.
- LEITHWOOD, S., The dimensions of curriculum innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(1981): 25–36.
- LOUCKS, S., and CRANDALL, D. “The practice profile: an all purpose tool for program communication, staff development, evaluation and improvement” Andover, Massachusetts THE NETWORK, Inc., 1982.
- LOUIS, K., and ROSENBLUM, S. Linking r&d with schools: A program and its implications for dissemination. Washington: National Institute of Education, 1981.
- RHINE, R. Ed. Making schools more effective: New directions from Follow Through. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
- RUBIN, R., STUCK, G., and REVICKI, D. “A model for assessing the degree of implementation in a field based educational program”. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association annual meeting, 1980.
- SCHILLER, J., STALFORD, C., RUDNER, L., KOCHER, T., and LESNICK, H. “Plans for follow through research and development”. National Institute of Education, 1980.
- STEBBINS, L., ST. PIERRE, R., PROPER, E., ANDERSON, R., and CERVA, T. Education as experimentation: A planned variation model (Vol. IV-A: An evaluation of follow through). Abt Association, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1977.
- WANG, M. “The degree of implementation assessment measures for the adaptive learning environments model” Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 1980.
- WERNER, W. “Evaluating program evaluation”, unpublished paper. Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, 1982.