3
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Book Reviews

Book Reviews

, &
Pages 211-237 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • BEREITER, CARL, and SCARDAMALIA, MARLENE. “Levels of inquiry in writing research.” In Research in Writing: Principles and methods, edited by P. Mosenthal, S. Walmsley, and L. Tamor. New York: Longman International, 1983.
  • BEREITER, CARL, and SCARDAMALIA, MARLENE. “Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of ‘inert knowledge’.” Thinking and learning skills: Current research and open questions (Vol. 2), edited by S. S. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser. Hillsdale, N.J.: Earlbaum, in press.
  • FLOWER, L., and HAYES, J. R. “The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning.” Research in the Teaching of English 15 (1981): 229–244.
  • SCARDAMALIA, MARLENE, and BEREITER, CARL. “Written composition.” In Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), Edited by M. C. Wittrock. New York: Macmillan, in press.
  • SCARDAMALIA, MARLENE, BEREITER, CARL, and STEINBACH, ROSANNE. “Teachability of independent reflective processes in composition.” Cognitive Science, in press.

REFERENCES

  • ANDERSON, DIGBY C. Evaluating curriculum proposals. London: Croom Helm, 1981.
  • BAKER, EVA. “The technology of instructional development.” In Second Handbook of Research on Teaching, Edited by Robert M. Travers. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
  • BECHER, TONY, and MCCLURE, STUART. The politics of curriculum change. London: Hutchinson, 1978.
  • BERLAK, ANN C., BERLAK, HAROLD, BAGENTOS, N. T., and MIKEL, E. R. “Teaching and learning in English primary schools.” School Review 83 (1975): 215–242.
  • CONNELLY, F. MICHAEL. “The function of curriculum development.” Interchange 3 (1972): 161–77.
  • CONNELLY, F. MICHAEL, and BEN-PERETZ, MIRIAM. “Teachers' roles in the using and doing of research and curriculum development.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 12 (1980): 95–107.
  • DEWEY, JOHN. The sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright, 1929.
  • EASTWOOD, GORDON. “Observation on slogan systems.” Canadian Education and Research Digest 4 (1964): 208–218.
  • EISNER, ELLIOT, and VALLANCE, ELIZABETH. Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1974.
  • ELLIOT, JOHN. Objectivity, ideology, and teacher participation in educational research. Norwich, England: University of East Anglia. Center for Applied Research in Education, 1975.
  • ELSTEIN, ARTHUR, SHULMAN, LEE, and SPRAFKA, SARAH. Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
  • FOSHAY, ARTHUR W., Ed. Considered action for curriculum improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1980.
  • FULLEN, MICHAEL, and POMFRET, ALAN. Research on curriculum and instructional implementation. Review of Educational Research 47 (1977): 27–42.
  • GIACQUINTA, JOSEPH B., and KAZLOW, C. “The growth and decline of public school innovations: A national study of the open classroom in the United States.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 12 (1979): 61–73.
  • GOODLAD, JOHN I. The dynamics of educational change. New York: McGraw Hill, 1975.
  • GOODLAD, JOHN, and KLEIN, M. FRANCES. Behind the classroom door. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company, 1970.
  • HARRIS, ILENE. “Communication for guiding teachers: The impact of different conceptions of teaching and educational practice.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March, 1982.
  • HARRIS, ILENE. “Forms of discourse and their possibilities for guiding practice: Towards an effective rhetoric.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 15 (1983): 27–42.
  • HAVELOCK, R. C. “Planning for innovation.” Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, 1971.
  • HERRON, MARSHALL D. “The nature of scientific inquiry.” School Review 79 (1971): 171–212.
  • HOUSE, ERNEST R. “Technology vs. craft: A ten year perspective on innovation.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 11 (1979): 1–13.
  • HYMAN, RONALD T. Approaches in curriculum. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
  • JACKSON, PHILIP. Life in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
  • KELLY, GEORGE A. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton, 1955.
  • KOMISAR, B. PAUL, and MCCLELLAN, JOHN E. “The logic of slogans.” In Language and concepts in education, Edited by B. Othaniel Smith and Robert H. Ennis. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1971.
  • LORTIE, DAN C. “Observations on teaching as work.” In Second handbook of research on teaching, Edited by Robert M. Travers. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
  • LORTIE, DAN C. School-teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
  • MACDONALD, BARRY, and WALKER, ROBERT. Changing the curriculum. London: Open Books, 1976.
  • NORMAN, GEOFFREY R., BARROWS, HOWARD S., FEIGHTER, JOHN W., and NEUFELD, VICTOR R. “Measuring the outcome of clinical problem-solving.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, November, 1977.
  • OLSON, JOHN K. “Teachers' constructs and curriculum change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 12 (1980): 1–11.
  • PINAR, WILLIAM, Ed., Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1975.
  • REID, WILLIAM A. Thinking about the curriculum: The nature and treatment of curriculum problems. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.
  • SARASON, SEYMOUR. The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1971.
  • SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review 78 (1969): 1–23.
  • SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: Arts of electic.” School Review 79 (1971): 493–592.
  • SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: Translation into curriculum.” School Review 81 (1973): 501–22.
  • SMITH, LOUIS M. and GEOFFREY, WILLIAM. The complexities of an urban classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
  • SMITH, LOUIS M., and KEITH, PAT M. Anatomy of educational innovation: An organizational analysis of an elementary school. New York: Wiley, 1971.
  • SUYDAM, M. N. “Mathematics education.” ASCD Curriculum Update, February, 1981.
  • WALKER, DECKER. “The curriculum field in formation. A review of the Twenty-Sixth Yearbook of the National Society of the Study of Education.” Curriculum Theory Network 4 (1975): 262–280.
  • WESTBURY, IAN. “Conventional classrooms, ‘open’ classrooms and the technology of teaching.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 5 (1973): 99–121.
  • WESTBURY, IAN. “How can curriculum guides guide teaching?” Journal of Curriculum Studies 15 (1983): 1–3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.