REFERENCES
- AUSTIN, A. Australian Education, 178–80. Melbourne: Pitman, 1961.
- BAKER, R. “Whither bureaucracy.” Occasional paper series, University of New South Wales, 1977.
- BATES, R. “The framework of control: bureaucracy, psychology and ideology.” In Educational Leadership in Schools, Study Guide 1, Edited by W. J. Smyth. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University, Open Campus Program, 1980, pp. 47–58.
- BLUMBERG, A. Supervisors and Teachers: A Private Cold War. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1980.
- BODINE, R. “Teachers' self-assessment.” In School Evaluation: the Process and the Politics, Edited by E. R. House. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1973, pp. 169–173.
- BURLINGAME, M. “Some neglected dimensions in the study of educational administration.” Educational Administration Quarterly 15, no. 1 (1979): 1–18.
- COGAN, MORRIS. Clinical Supervuion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973.
- COGAN, MORRIS.. “Current issues in the education of teachers.” In Teacher Education: The 74th Yearbook of the Study of Education. Part II, Edited by K. Ryan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
- CUBBERLEY, E. Public School Administration. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1922.
- EISNER, E. “An artistic approach to supervision.” In Supervision of Teaching, Edited by T. Sergiovanni. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982, pp. 53–66.
- ELLIOTT, J. “Development hypotheses about classroom from Teachers' practical constructs: an account of the work of the Ford Teaching Project.” Interchange 7, no. 2 (1976–1977): 2–27.
- FRIED, R. “Empowerment vs delivery of services.” New Hampshire State Department of Education, Office of Community Education, 1980.
- GARMAN, N. “The clinical approach to supervision.” In Supervision of Teaching, Edited by T. Sergiovanni. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982, pp. 35–52.
- GEERTZ, C. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic books, 1973.
- GOLDHAMMER, R. Clinical supervision: special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.
- HOUSE, E. R. “The conscience of educational evaluation.” Teachers College Record 73 (1972): 405–414.
- HUNT, D. “In-service training as persons-in relation.” Theory into Practice 17 (1978): 239–244.
- HYMES, D. “Ethnographic monitoring.” In Language Development in a Bilingual Society, Edited by E. J. Briere. National Multilingual Multicultural Materials Development Centre, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Los Angeles, 1979.
- KARIER, C. “Supervision in historic perspective.” In Supervision of Teaching, Edited by T. Sergiovanni. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982, pp. 2–15.
- MACKAY, D. and MARLAND, P. “Thought processes of teachers.” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, 1978.
- MARKS, J., STOOPS, E. and KING-STOOPS, J. Handbook of Educational Supervision: A Guide for the Practitioner, 2nd ed., Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
- MCNEIL, J. “A scientific approach to supervision.” In Supervision of Teaching, Edited by T. Sergiovanni. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982, pp. 18–34.
- ROMBERG, T. “Systematic monitoring of planned school change.” Unpublished paper, University of Tasmania, 1979. Cited in Educational Leadership in SchooL, Study Guide 2, Edited by W. J. Smyth. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University, Open Campus Program, 1980, pp. 5–22.
- SCHON, D. “Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy.” In Metaphor and Thought, Edited by A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
- SERGIOVANNI, T. “Supervision and the improvement of instruction.” In Supervision of Teaching, Edited by T. Sergiovanni. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982a, pp. vi–viii.
- SERGIOVANNI, T.. “Toward a theory of supervisory practice: integrating scientific clinical, and artistic views.” In Supervision of Teaching, Edited by T. Sergiovanni. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1982b, pp. 67–80.
- SERGIOVANNI, T.., and STARRATT, J. Supervision: Human Perspectives, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
- SMART, D. “The status of the teacher in the penal and early colonial New South Wales Society, 1788–1848.” In Australian Teachers: From Colonial Schoolmasters to Militant Professionals, Edited by A. Spaul. Melbourne: Macmillan, 1977, pp. 2–15.
- SMART, D.. “Ethnographic monitoring of children's acquisition of reading/language arts skills in and out of the classroom.” The Generator 12, no. 2 (1981): 37–68.
- SMYTH, J., MARTIN, J. and HENRY, C. “Clinical supervision: evidence of a viable strategy for teacher development.” The Australian Administrator 3, no. 5 (1982): 1–4.
- SNYDER, K. “Clinical supervision in the 1980s.” Educational Leadership 38, no. 7 (1981): 521–524.
- TAYLOR, C. “Interpretation and the science of man.” The Review of Metaphysics 25, no. 1 (1971).
- TAYLOR, F. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1911.
- WILES, J. and BONDI, J. Supervision: A Guide to Practice. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1980.
- WITHALL, J. and WOOD, F. “Taking the threat out of classroom observation and feedback.” Journal of Teacher Education 30, no. 1 (1979): 55–58.