An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing

REFERENCES

• Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., and Wilkinson, I. A. G. Becoming a nation of readers. The report of the Commission on Reading. Pittsburgh, PA: National Academy of Education, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, J. A. and Jenkins, J. R. “Differential diagnosis—prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal.” Review of Educational Research 49 (1979): 517–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. and Bird, M. “Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies.” Cognition and Instruction 2 (1985): 131–156.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. “Does learning to write have to be so difficult?” In A. Freedman. I. Pringle, and J. Yalden (Eds.). Learning to write: First language, second language, (pp. 20–33), New York: Longman Inc., 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. “Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of 'inert knowledge'” In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser (Eds.). Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions, (pp. 65–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985a.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. Intentional learning in school contexts. Unpublished report, Intentional Learning Project, Centre for Applied Cognitive Science, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, 1985b.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. “Intentional learning as a goal of instruction.” In L. B. Resnick(Ed.). Cognition and instruction: Issues and agendas. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. “Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes” Higher Education 8 (1979): 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. “Learning strategies, student motivation patterns and subjectively perceived success.” In J. R. Kirby(Ed.). Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp. 111–134). Orlando, FL: Academic, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. “Spectator role and the beginnings of writing.” In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 149–169). New York: Academic, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. “Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition.” In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., and Campione, J. C. “Learning, remembering, and understanding.” In J. H. Flavell and E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. and Campione, J. C. “Inducing flexible thinking: A problem of access.” In M. Friedman, J. P. Das, and N. O'Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and learning (pp. 515–529). New York: Plenum, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., and Day, J. D. “Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts.” Educational Researcher 10 (1981): 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. “Andrea learns to make writing hard.” Language Arts 56 (1979): 569–576.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. Lessons from a child: On the teaching and learning of writing. Exeter, NH: Heinemann Educational Books, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R. “A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction.” Review of Educational Research 48 (1978): 439–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, R. “A developmentally based approach to the problem of instructional design.” In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions (pp. 545–562). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R. and Sandieson, R. Two cognitive-developmental approaches to the design of remedial instruction. Cognitive Development, (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. An analysis of text books in relation to declining SAT scores. New York: College Board, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. “Interactive roles of knowledge and strategies in the development of organized sorting and recall.” In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2, Research and open questions (pp. 457–483). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. and Tamarkin, C. Marva Collins' way. Los Angeles. J. P. Tarcher, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperman, P. The literacy hoax, New York: Morrow, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Dansereau, D. F. “Learning strategy research.” In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 1, Relating instruction to research (pp. 209–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, R. B., and McNight, C. C. “Modelling the processes of mathematical thinking.” Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior 2 (1979): 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. Children's minds. London: Croom Helm, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. “What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction.” Reading Research Quarterly 14(1979): 481–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. “Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series.” Reading Research Quarterly 16 (1981): 515–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. D. Educational development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. J. “IQ and standard English.” College Composition and Communication 34 (1983): 470–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. Why Johnny still can't read: A new look at the scandal of our schools. New York: Harper & Row, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L. S. and Hayes, J. R. “The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem.” College Composition and Communication 31 (1980): 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, R. “Cognitive development.” Annual Review of Psychology 29 (1978): 297–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. “Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.” American Psychologist 39 (1984): 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goody, J. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, J. and Watt, J. “The consequences of literacy.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (1963): 304–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. Balance the basics: Let them write. New York: Ford Foundation, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. and Myers, M. “The Bay Area Writing Project.” Phi Delta Kappan 59 (1978): 110–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. Learning algebra: A case of cognitive skill acquisition. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Guender, P. A., Harvey, L. K., Loyd, D., and Wages, J. W. (Eds.). They really taught us how to write. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Havelock, E. Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Heap, J. L. “Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons.” Curriculum Inquiry 15 (1985): 245–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Jr., E. D. “Cultural literacy.” The American Scholar 52 (1983): 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J. How children fail. New York: Pitman, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental models: Toward a cognitive science o f language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Karmiloff-Smith, A. and Inhelder, B. “If you want to get ahead, get a theory.” Cognition 3 (1976): 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesgold, A. M. “Acquiring expertise.” In J. R. Anderson and S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory (pp. 31–60). San Francisco: Freeman, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. “Comprehensive monitoring.” In W. P. Dixon (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 61–84). New York: Academic, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. and Saljo, R. “On qualitative differences in learning, I. Outcome and process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1976a): 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. and Saljo, R. “On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1976b): 115–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, H. J. The uses of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. A nation at risk. The imperative of educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Nold, E. W. “Revising.” In C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication (pp. 6779). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. “From utterance to text. The bias of language in speech and writing.” Harvard Educational Review 47 (1977): 257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. A. and Brown, A. L. “Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities.” Cognition and Instruction 1 (1984): 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. and Wixon, K. K. “Becoming a strategic reader.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 8 (1983): 293–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. and Gallagher, M. C. “The instruction of reading comprehension.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 8 (1983): 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Hansen J., and Gordon, C. “The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information.” Journal of Reading Behavior 11 (1979): 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovsky, A. R. “Grammar instruction: What we know.” College English 28 (1977): 247–250.
   Google Scholar
• Rella, M. Modelling higher levels of thought in order to elevate the constructive mental effort in six-year olds. Unpublished honors thesis, York University, Downsview, Ontario, Canada, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. and Neches, R. “Factors affecting individual differences in learning ability.” In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 275–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, D. P. and Resnick, L. B. “The nature of literacy: An historical exploration.” Harvard Educational Review 47 (1977): 370–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehler, L. R. and Duffy, G. G. “Direct explanation of comprehension processes.” In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, and J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265–280). New York: Longman, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. “Assimilative processes in composition planning.” Educational Psychologist 17 (1982): 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. “Development of strategies in text processing.” In H. Mandi, N. Stein, and T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 379–406). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. “Development of dialectical processes in composition.” In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, and A. Hildyard (Eds.). Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 307–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1985a.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. “Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing.” In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2. Research and open questions (pp. 563–577). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1985b.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. “Research on written composition.” In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan Education, 1985c.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. “Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition.” In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 1). New York: Cambridge University Press, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., and Steinbach, R. “Teachability of reflective processes in written composition.” Cognitive Science 8 (1984): 173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribner, S. and Cole, M. “Unpackaging literacy.” In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 1, pp. 71–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Spache, G. D. and Spache, E. B. Reading in the elementary school (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F. “On learning and learning from text.” In H. Mandi, N. L. Stein, and T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 193–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar