The Seldom-Spoken Roots of the Curriculum

REFERENCES

• Abbs, P. 1982. English within the arts: A radical alternative for English and the arts in the curriculum. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, M. H. 1953. The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. and L. D. Travis. 1983. Psychology and the liberal consensus. Waterloo, ON.: Sir Wilfred Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babbit, I. 1977. Rousseau and Romanticism. 1919. Reprint. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Barns, D. 1975. From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlet, E. C. 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. 1984. The limits of interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry 14: 211–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia. 1987. An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry 17(1): 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoff, A. 1983. The intelligent hand and the thinking eye. In The writer's mind: Writing as a mode of thinking, ed. J. Hays et al., 191–196. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. 1980. Shaping at the point of utterance. In Reinventing the rhetorical tradition, eds. A. Freedman and I. Pringle, 61–66. Conway, AK: L and S.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. 1972. Language and learning. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. 1971. What's the use? A schematic account of language functions. Educational Review 23(3): 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. 1984. Wordsworth's second nature: A study of poetry and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, F. A. 1978. Generative rhetoric of the sentence. In Notes toward a new rhetoric: Nine essays for teachers, eds. F. A. and B. Christensen, 23–44. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Coleridge, S. T. 1983. Biographia literaria. 1817. Reprint. Eds. J. Engell and W. J. Bate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, L. 1961. The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 1986. Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review 56: 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. 1986. Is it growth of social inculcation: Dartmouth revisited. Unpublished paper presented at Fourth International Conference on the Teaching of English, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz, F. and R. Elbaz. 1981. Literature and curriculum: Toward a view of curriculum as discursive practice. Curriculum Inquiry 11: 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engell, J. 1981. The creative imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, N. 1968. A study of Romanticism. Chicago: Univeristy of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geoffrey of Vinsauf. 1967. Poetria nova. 1200. Reprint. Trans. Margaret Nims. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. 1984. Subjects for study: Toward a social history of curriculum. In Defining the curriculum: Ethnographies and histories, eds. I. Goodson and S. Ball. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. 1984. Write with the children. In his A research learns to write: Selected articles and monographs. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. 1982. Writing: Children and teachers at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, P. 1980. Research versus psycholinguistic approach to beginning reading. Elementary School Journal 81: 54–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harros, R. W. 1969. Romanticism and the social order, 1780–1830. London: Blanford.
   Google Scholar
• Harste, J., V. Woodward, and C. Burke. 1984. Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, J., P. Roth, J. Ramsey, and R. Foulke. eds. 1983. The writer's mind: Writing as a mode of thinking. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
   Google Scholar
• Hillock, G. 1986. Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCRE.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1962. Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, D. 1979. Foundations of literacy. Sydney: Ashton Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Homans, M. 1980. Women writers and poetic identity: Dorothy Wordsworth, Emily Bronte and Emily Dickinson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hourd, M. 1949. The education of the poetic spirit. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobus. M. 1984. The art of managing books: Romantic prose and the writing of the past. In Romanticism and language, ed. A. Reed, 215–246. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, P. 1984. Being in the text: Self-representation from Wordsworth to Roland Barthes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, C. H. and L. Brannon. 1984. Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boyton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. 1982. The reading process. In Secondary school reading, eds. A. Berger and H. A. Robinson. Urbana, IL: NCRE.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, A. O. 1960. On the discrimination of romanticisms. In English Romantic poets: Modern essays of criticism, ed. M. H. Abrams, 39–52. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N. 1983. Mostly about writing: Selected essays. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boyton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, M. 1975. The preachers of culture: A study of English and its teachers. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, T. 1981. Romanticism and the forms of ruin: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and modalities of fragmentation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, J. 1983. The Romantic ideology: A critical investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medway, P. 1980. Finding a language: Autonomy and learning in school. London: Writers and Readers.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E. 1977. Caught in the web of words: James M. H. Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newsome, D. 1974. Two classes of men: Platonism and English Romantic thought. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. 1982. The writer's workshop. Don Mills, ON.: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, D. 1985. Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 724–738.
   Google Scholar
• Peckham, M. 1970. Towards a theory of Romanticism. In The triumph of Romanticism. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. 1952. Plato's Phaedrus. Trans. R. Hackforth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, J. 1983. Rhetoric and Romanticism. In The writer's mind: Writing as a mode of thinking, eds. J. Hays et al., 3–14. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 1978. The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of poetry. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J. 1979. Emile or on education. Trans. Allan Bloom. New York: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, eds. R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer, 33–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, R. and A. Green. 1975. Education and social control: A study in progressive primary education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, P. 1965. A defence of poetry. In The complete works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. VII, eds. R. Ingpen and W. F. Peck, 109–142. New York: Gordian.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1968. From ‘The philosophy of poetry’ 1835. In Romantic criticism: 1800–1850, ed. R. A. Foakes, 174–191. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. 1985. A metaphor for literacy: Creating worlds or shunting information. In Literacy, language, and learning, eds. D. Olson, N. Torrance, and A. Hildyard, 195–213. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. 1982. Writing and the writer. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. 1978. Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, M. 1984. The place of literature in literacy: ‘Dip a finger into Fafnir.’ In English teaching: An international exchange, ed. J. Britton, 195–213. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkinson, W. S. 1921. The teaching of English: A new approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. 1986. More a torment than a benefit: English grammar in Nova Scotia schools in the nineteenth century. Curriculum Inquiry 16(4): 439–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. 1985. Parallels between new paradigms in science and in reading and literary theories: An essay review. Research in the Teaching of English, 19: 298–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. 1980. Psycholinguistics and reading: From process to practice. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wordsworth, W. 1968. Preface to lyrical ballads 1800; revised 1802. In Romantic criticism: 1800–1850, ed. R. A. Foakes, 60–70. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. 1980. Arts, crafts, gifts and knacks: Some disharmonies in the new rhetoric. In Reinventing the rhetorical tradition, eds. A. Freedman and I. Pringle, 53–60. Conway, AK: L and S.
   Google Scholar