6
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Knowledge Use and School Improvement

&
Pages 33-62 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, P. 1983. Decision-making by objection and the Cuban missle crisis. Administrative science quarterly. 28: 201–222.
  • Alexander, K. and A. Pallas. 1985. Curriculum reform and school performance. Baltimore: Center for the Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
  • Berman, P. 1978. The study of macro- and micro-implementation. Public policy. 26: 157–184.
  • Berman, P. 1981. Educational change: An implementation paradigm. In Improving schools: Using what we know, ed. R. Lehming and M. Kane: 253–286. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Berman, P. and M. McLaughlin. 1977. Federal programs supporting educational change, vol. 9. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  • Carlson, R. 1965. Adoption of educational innovations. Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
  • Carnegie Forum. 1986. A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
  • Cohn, M. and A. Distefano. 1984. The recommendations of the national commission on excellence in education: A case study of their value. Issues in education. 2: 204–219.
  • Crandall, D. et al. 1983. People, policies and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement (vols I-X). Andover, MA: The Network.
  • Deal, T. 1984. Searching for the wizard: The quest for excellence in education. Issues in education. 26: 56–67.
  • Dentler, R. 1984. Ambiguities in state-local relations. Education and Urban Society. 16: 145–164.
  • Farrar, E., J. DeSanctis, and D. Cohen. 1980. Views from below. Teachers College Record. 82: 77–100.
  • Glaser, E., H. Abelson, and K. Garrison. 1983. Putting knowledge to use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Granovetter, M. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Social structure and network analysis, ed. P. Marsden and N. Lin. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hargreaves, A. 1984. Experience counts, theory doesn't: How teachers talk about their work. Sociology of education. 57: 244–254.
  • Hopkins, D. 1985. School-based review for school improvement. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.
  • Huberman, M. 1983. Recipes for busy kitchens: A situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools. Knowledge. 4: 478–510.
  • Huberman, M. 1985. What knowledge is of most worth to teachers: A knowledge use perspective. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meetings, April.
  • Huberman, M. and M. Miles. 1984. Innovation up close. New York: Plenum.
  • Katz, D. and R. Kahn. 1966. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • Kirst, M. 1979. Strengthening Federal-Social Relationships supporting educational change. In The dynamics of planned educational change, eds. R. Herriott and N. Gross. Berkeley: McCutcheon.
  • Lindblom, C. and D. Cohen. 1979. Useable knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Little, J. 1983. School success and staff development: The role of staff development in urban desegregated schools. Boulder: Center for Action Research.
  • Little, J. 1984. Seductive images and organizational realities. Teachers college record. 86: 84–102.
  • Louis, K. S. 1986. Reforming secondary schools: A Critique and an agenda for administrators. Educational leadership. 44: 33–36.
  • Louis, K. S. 1987. Permanent innovations: Theoretical and administrative issues in institutionalizing change. In Naar beter onderwijs (Toward better education), eds. J. Voogt and A. Rients. Tilburg: Zwijsen.
  • Louis, K. S. and R. Corwin. 1984. Organizational decline: How state agencies adapt. Education and urban society. 16: 165–188.
  • Louis, K. S., R. Dentler, and D. Kell. 1984. Exchanging ideas: The communication and use of knowledge in education. Boston, MA: Center for Survey Research.
  • Louis, K. S., S. Rosenblum, and J. Molitor. 1981. Strategies for knowledge use and school improvement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
  • Louis, K. S. and W. van Velzen. 1986. Policy making for school improvement: A comparative analysis of four policy issues. Paper presented to the International School Improvement Project, October.
  • Love, J. 1985. Knowledge transfer and utilization in education. In Review of research in education, vol. 12, ed. E. Gordon. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Mann, D. 1978. The user driven systems and a modest proposal. In Making change happen, ed. D. Mann: 285–307. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • March, J. and J. Olsen. 1976. Ambiguity and choice in organization. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • March, J. and H. Simon. 1958. Organization. New York: Wiley.
  • McDill, E., G. Natriello, and A. Pallas. 1985. Raising standards and retaining students: The impact of the reform recommendations on potential dropouts. Baltimore: Center for the Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
  • Menlo, A. 1985. A reconceptualization of resistance to change and its application to the institutionalization process. Paper presented to the International School Improvement Project, Lucerne, Switzerland, June.
  • Miles, M. 1978. On networking. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
  • Mort, P. 1964. Studies in educational innovation from the Institute of Administrative Research. In Innovation in Education, ed. M. Miles. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Nelson, M. and S. Sieber. 1976. Innovation in urban secondary schools. School Review. 27: 101–119.
  • Pipho, C. 1985. The excellence movement: On ice for the summer? Phi delta kappan, 66: 669–670.
  • Reimers, F. 1985. Educational reform as planned organizational change: Analysis in the Latin American Context. Unpublished course paper, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
  • Rogers, E. 1982. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. and F. Shoemaker. 1972. Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.
  • Sarason, S. 1971. The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Sieber, S. D. 1981. Knowledge utilization in public education: Incentives and disincentives. In Improving schools: Using what we know, eds. R. Lehming and M. Kane: 115–167. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Sieber, S. D., K. S. Louis, and L. Metzger. 1972. The Use of educational knowledge. New York: Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research.
  • Smith, A. and K. S. Louis, eds. 1982. Multimethod policy research: Issues and applications. American Behavioral Scientists, 21: 1–144.
  • UNESCO. 1965. Educational reform: Experiences and prospects. Belgium: UNESCO Press.
  • United States Department of Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • van den Berg, R. and R. Vandenberghe. 1984. Grootschaligheid in de Onder- wijsvernieuwing. (Large scale innovation in Education). Tilburg: Zwijsen.
  • van Velzen, W. G., M. Miles, M. Eckholm, U. Hameyer, and D. Robin, eds. 1985.
  • Making School Improvement Work. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.
  • Weiss, C. 1979. Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy analysis, 3: 531–545.
  • Yin, R. K., M. Gwaltney, and K. S. Louis. 1980. Quality control and product information systems: An interim report on implementation, use and effects in the R&D utilization program. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc.
  • Yin, R. K. 1984. Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.