Metaphors in Collision: Objectives, Assembly Lines, and Stories

REFERENCES

• Ames, L. B. (1966). Children's stories. Genetical Psychological Monographs, 73: 337–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (1978). The child's concept of story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbitt, F. (1918). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, S. (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper. D. (1986). Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cornford, F. M. (1907). Thucydides Mythistoricus. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1928). Progressive education and the science of education. Progressive Education, 5, July-September.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1929). The Source of a Science of Education. New York: Liveright.
   Google Scholar
• Duchastel, P. C. and P. F. Merrill (1973). The effects of behavioral objectives on learning: A review of empirical studies. Review of Educational Research, 43: 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (1978). What is a plot. New Literary History. 9: 455–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (1986). Teaching as Story-Telling. London, Ontario: The Althouse Press; (1987). London and New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (1988). Primary Understanding. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1969). Instructional and expressive educational objectives: Their formulation and use in curriculum. In Instructional Objectives, ed. W. J. Popham, E. W. Eisner, H. J. Sullivan, and L. L. Tyler, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. No. 3. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1974). Knowledge and the Curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (1977). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. London: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kermode, F. (1967). The sense of an ending. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kliebard, H. M. (1975). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. In Curriculum Theorizing, ed. W. Pinar, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, R. F. (1978). Resolution of conflicting claims concerning the effects of behavioral objectives on student learning. Review of Educational Research. 48: 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milburn, G. (1984). On discipline stripping: Difficulties in the application of humanistic metaphors to educational phenomena. Canadian Journal of Education. 9(4): 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1978). The Body in Question. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.) (1981). On narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paley, V. G. (1981). Wally's Stories. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and Education. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (1973). Criterion-Referenced Instruction. Belmont, CA: Fearon.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. and E. L. Baker (1979). Systematic Instruction. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum: Design and Development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, G. (1973). A grammar of stories. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Pring, R. (1973). Objectives and innovation: The irrelevance of theory. London Educational Review. 2: 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, H. (1986). The importance of story. Language Arts, 63(3).
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, R. (1982). Semiotics and Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steers, R. M., and L. W. Porter (1974). The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin. 81: 434–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1970). The humanities curriculum project. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1: 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, D. and L. N. Tanner (1980). Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, T. (1977). The poetics of prose. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1987). The Meaning Makers. London: Hodder and Staughton.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1973). Metahistory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The Aims of Education. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar