Liberal Education and Open Society: Absolutism and Relativism in Curriculum Theory

REFERENCES

• Alexander, H. A. (1986a). “Cognitive relativism in evaluation.” Evaluation Review 10(3): 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, H. A. (1986b). “Eisner's aesthetic theory of evaluation.” Educational Theory 36(3): 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Colleges (1985). Integrity in the college curriculum. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Daniel (1965). The reforming of general education. N. Y.: Columbia Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, W. J. (1985). To reclaim a legacy: A report on the humanities in higher education. Washington, D. C., National Endowment For the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Cornford, F. M. (1959). Plato's theory of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Darkey, W. A. [ed.] (1979). Three dialogues on liberal education. Annapolis: St. John's College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. N. Y.: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. N. Y.: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Donmoyer, R. (1985). “The rescue from relativism: two failed attempts and an alternative strategy.” Educational Researcher 14(10): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1978). “The impoverished mind.” Educational Leadership 35(8): 615–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination. N. Y.: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1981). “Mind as cultural achievement.” Educational Leadership 38(6): 466–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1982). Cognition and curriculum. N. Y.: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. (1975). “Science and the structure of knowledge.” In P. L. Gardner[ed.], The structure of science education. Hawthorn: Longman Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. W. (1986). “Some principles of postpositivist philosophy of science.” Educational Researcher 15(9): 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gribble, J. H. (1970). “Forms of knowledge.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 2(1): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, H. B. (1958). Patterns of discovery. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Report (1946). General education in a free society. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hindness, E. (1972). “Forms of knowledge.” Proceedings of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain 6(2): 164–175.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. H. (1965). “Liberal education and the nature of knowledge.” In R. D. Archambault[ed.], Philosophical analysis and education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. H. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. H. and R. S. Peters. (1970). The logic of education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hook, S. (1946). “A critical appraisal of the St. John's College curriculum,” in Education for Modern Man. N. Y.: Dial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulbert, A. (1985). “Curriculum commotion.” The New Republic 192(18): 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, R. M. (1952). The great conversation. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, R. M. (1953). The conflict of education in a democratic society. N. Y.: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, R. M. (1968). The learning society. N. Y.: Fredrick A. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Krausz, M. and J. W. Meiland [eds.], (1982). Relativism: cognitive and moral. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. (1972). Contemporary educational theory. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1935). “Renaissance and method in philosophy,” in Studies in the History of Ideas. N. Y.: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1937). “Education and the disciplines.” Ethics 47(3): 370–381.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. (1965). “Education as initiation.” In R. D. Archambault[ed.], Philosophical analysis and education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: George, Allen, and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Phenix, P. H. (1964). Realms of meaning. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1970). “Perspectives on the structure of knowledge and the curriculum.” In P. W. Musgrave[ed.], Contemporary studies in the curriculum. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1971). “The distinguishing features of forms of knowledge.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 3(2): 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1975). “Popper and pragmatism.” Educational theory 25(1): 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (1983). “After the wake: postpositivist educational thought.” Educational Researcher 12(5): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. N. Y.: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, N. Y.: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1970). “The dangers of normal science,” in A. Musgrave and I. Lakatos [eds.], Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1949). “Scientific knowledge and liberal education.” Journal of General Education 3(4): 245–266. References follow pagination in Westbury and Wilkof [eds.] (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1956). “Science and civil discourse: the uses of diversity.” Journal of General Education 9(3): 132–143. References follow pagination in Westbury and Wilkof [eds.] (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1960). “What do scientists do?” Behavioral Science 5(1): 1–27. References follow pagination in Westbury and Wilkof [eds.] (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1961). “Education and the structure of the disciplines.” In I. Westbury and N. Wilkof [eds.] (1978), Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1962). “The concept of a structure of a discipline.” Education Record 43(3): 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1964). “The structure of the disciplines: meanings and significances.” In G. W. Ford and L Pungo [eds.], Structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1984). “Goodmanian relativism.” The Monist 67(3): 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1986). “Relativism, truth, and incoherence.” Synthese 68(2): 225–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis, J. (1984). “On the nature of educational research.” Educational Researcher 13(10): 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tarski, A. (1943). “The semantic conception of truth.” Philosophy and Phe- nomenological Research 4(3): 341–373.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, P. (1986). “Good times vs. great books.” The New Republic 195(23): 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. and N. Wilkof [eds.], (1978). Science, curriculum, and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (1969). “The curriculum: justification and taxonomy.” British Journal of Educational Studies 17(1): 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doren, M. (1943). Liberal education. N. Y.: Henry Holt and Co.
   Google Scholar