3
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Book Reviews

Book Reviews

&
Pages 239-260 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Berry, W. 1983. Standing by words. San Francisco: North Point Press.
  • Brown, L. R., and Postel, S. 1987. “Thresholds of Change.” in L. Starke (Ed.), State of the world 1987: A Worldwatch Institute Report on progress toward a sustainable society New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Giroux, H. A. 1981. Ideology culture and the process of schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Giroux, H. A. Winter 1988. Schrag speaks: Spinning the wheels of misfortune. Educational Theory, 38:145–146.
  • Schmitt, C. 1976. The concept of the political. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Schon, D. A. 1979. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Baker, H. S., and Campbell, C. H. 1953. Words and ideas, Book 3. Toronto: W. J. Gage & Co.
  • Berlin, J. 1988, September. Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English, 50, 5:477–494.
  • Berthoff, A. E. 1985. I. A. Richards. In John Brereton (Ed.), Traditions of inquiry, pp. 50–80. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bizzell, P. 1982. College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry, 12:191–207.
  • Booth, W. C. 1963, October. The rhetorical stance. College Composition and Communication, 14 3:139–145.
  • Broderick, J. H. 1958, Winter. A study of the freshman composition course at Amherst: Action, order, language. Harvard Educational Review, 28:44–57.
  • Faigley, L. 1986, October. Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English, 48, 6:527–542.
  • Freire, P., and Macedo, D. 1987. Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Harvey.
  • Gibson, W. 1985. Theodore Baird. In John Brereton (Ed.), Traditions in inquiry, pp. 136–152. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.