62
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reading Positions and Practices in the Classroom

, &
Pages 435-457 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, R. C. 1977. The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro and W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 422–437).
  • Anderson, R. C. and Pearson, P. D. 1984. A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman (pp. 255–292).
  • Apple, M. W. and Christian-Smith, L. C. (Eds.). 1991. The politics of the textbook. London: Routledge.
  • Baker, C. D. 1991. Literacy practices and social relations in classroom reading events. In C. D. Baker and A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (pp. 28–41).
  • Baker, C. D. and Freebody, P. 1989. Children's first schoolbooks: Introductions to the culture of literacy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Baker, C. D. and Luke A. 1991. Discourses on practice: A postscript. In C. D. Baker and A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (pp. 257–268).
  • Baker, C. D. and Perrott, C. 1988. The news session in infants' and primary classrooms. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9, 19–38.
  • Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Barthes, R. 1957. Mythologies. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
  • Birch, D. 1989. Language, literature and critical practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1986. Distinction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Byrne, B. J. In press. Studies in unbiased acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In P. B. Cough (Ed.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cazden, C. D. 1988. Classroom discourse. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
  • Chall, J. S. 1967. Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Chall, J. S. 1979. The great debate: Ten years later, with a modest proposal for reading stages. In L. B. Resnick and P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading, Vol. I. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Christie, F. In press. The morning news genre: Ideologies of childhood, knowledge and power in early childhood education. London: Falmer Press.
  • Clay, M. M. and Cazden, C. D. In press/1991. A Vygotskian interpretation of “Reading Recovery”. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cole, M. and Griffin, P. 1986. A socio-historical approach to remediation. In S. de Castell, A. Luke and K. Egan (Eds.), Literacy, society and schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 110–131).
  • Collins, J. 1989. Hegemonic practice: Literacy and standard language in public education. Journal of Education, 171, 9–34.
  • Cook-Gumperz, J. (Ed.). 1986. The social construction of literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Corcoran, B. and Evans, E. (Eds.). 1987. Readers, texts, teachers. Montclair, New Jersey: Boynton-Cook.
  • Crismore, A. 1989. Rhetorical form, selection and use of textbooks. In S. de Castell, A. Luke and C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and criticism. London: Falmer Press (pp. 133–152).
  • Culler, J. 1980. On deconstruction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Derrida, J. 1981. “An interview with Jacques Derrida,” The Literary Review, 14.
  • Dixon, J. and Brown, J. 1985. Responses to literature: What is being assessed? Parts 2 and 3. London: Schools Council.
  • Eagleton, T. 1984. Frere Jacques: The politics of deconstruction. Semiotica, 48.
  • Eco, U. 1978. The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
  • Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish, (trans. A. Sheridan). New York: Harper.
  • Freebody, P. 1991. Remarks on cognitive psychological and critical sociological accounts of reading. In A. Luke and C. D. Baker (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (pp. 239–256).
  • Freebody, P. In press. Inventing cultural-capitalist distinctions in the assessment of HSC papers. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy and social processes. Darwin, NT: Northern Territory University Press.
  • Gilbert, P. 1987. Post reader-response: The deconstructive critique. In B. Corcoran and E. Evans (Eds.), Readers, texts, teachers. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook (pp. 234–250).
  • Gilbert, P. 1989. Writing, schooling and deconstruction: From voice to text in the classroom. London: Routledge.
  • Goodman, K., Shannon, P., Freeman, Y., and Murphy, S. 1988. Report card on basal readers. New York: Richard C. Owen.
  • Griswold, W. 1987. The fabrication of meaning: Literary interpretation in the United States, Great Britain and the West Indies. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1077–1117.
  • Hasan, R. and Martin, J. R. 1990. Language development: Learning language, learning culture. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Heap, J. 1991. A situated perspective on what counts as reading. In A. Luke and C. D. Baker (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (pp. 103–140).
  • Heath, S. B. 1981. What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and in school. Language in Society, 11, 49–76.
  • Heath, S. B. 1986. Critical factors in literacy development. In S. de Castell, A. Luke, and K. Egan (Eds.), Literacy, society and schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 209–229).
  • Holdaway, D. 1978. Foundations of literacy. Sydney: Ashton.
  • Hunter, I. 1988. Culture and government: The emergence of literary education. London: MacMillan.
  • Kress, G. 1985. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lemke, J. 1986. Ideology, intertextuality, and the notion of register. In J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex (pp. 207–231).
  • Luke, A. 1988. Literacy, textbooks and ideology. London: Falmer Press.
  • Luke, A. 1989. Open and closed texts: The semantic/ideological analysis of textbook narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 13, 53–80.
  • Luke, A. In press. The body literate: Discursive inscription in early literacy training. Linguistics and Education.
  • Luke, A. and Gilbert, P. 1991. Reading gender in a teacher education program. English in Australia, 95, 59–65.
  • MacGinitie, W. and MacGinitie, R. 1986. Teaching students to not read. In S. de Castell, A. Luke and K. Egan (Eds.), Literacy, society and schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 256–269).
  • McHoul, A. W. 1991. readings. In C. D. Baker and A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (pp. 191–210).
  • Mellor, B., Hemming, J., and Leggett, J. (Eds.). Changing stories. Scarborough, WA: Chalkface Press.
  • Mellor, B., O'Neill, M. and Patterson, A. (Eds.). 1986. Reading stories. Scarborough, WA: Chalkface Press.
  • Meyer, B. J. F. 1982. Reading research and the composition teacher: The importance of plans. College Composition and Communication, 33, 37–49.
  • Michaels, S. 1981. Sharing time: An oral preparation for literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423–442.
  • Moss, G. 1991. Reading English, reading the media-or how to read differently. English in Australia, 95, 49–58.
  • Pearson, P. D. P. (Ed.). 1984. Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
  • Pecheux, M. 1982. Language, semantics, and ideology. (Trans. H. Nagpal). London: MacMillan.
  • Purdy, S. and Sandak, C. R. 1982. Aztecs. New York: Franklin Watts.
  • Queensland Department of Education. 1991. Language in education, P-10. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Education.
  • Rumelhart, D. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rumelhart, D. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce and W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 33–58).
  • Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 1986. Research on written composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan (pp. 778–803).
  • Schallert, D. L. 1982. The significance of knowledge: A synthesis of research related to schema theory. In W. Otto and S. White (Eds.), Reading expository material. New York: Academic Press (pp. 13–48).
  • Scribner, S. and Cole, M. 1981. The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Silverman, M. and Torode, B. 1980. The material word. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Singer, H. and Ruddell, R. B. (Eds.). 1985. Theoretical models and processes of reading. Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Stanovich, K. E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
  • Street, B. V. 1984. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taxel, J. 1989. Children's literature: A research proposal from the perspective of the sociology of school knowledge. In S. de Castell, A. Luke and C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and criticism. London: Falmer Press (pp. 32–45).
  • Unsworth, L. 1988. Whole language or procedural display? Australian Journal of Reading, 11, 127–137.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. 1976. Text and context. London: Longman.
  • Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Willinsky, J. 1986. The well-tempered tongue: The politics of standard English in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Zinsser, C. 1986. For the Bible tells me so: Literacy in a fundamentalist church. In B. B. Schieffelin and P. Gilmore (Eds.), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex (pp. 55–71).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.