Science and Spirituality: Tradition and Interpretation in Liberal Education

REFERENCES

• Alexander, H. A. 1989a. “Liberal education and open society: Absolutism and relativism in curriculum theory.” Curriculum Inquiry 19(1): 12—32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, H. A. 1989b. “Criticism and curriculum: Between Phillips and Eisner.” Curriculum Inquiry 19(1): 67–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquinas, T. 1955. “On the way in which divine truth is made known.” In Summa Contra Gentiles. Reprinted in A. Regis (trans.), On the truth of the Catholic faith. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R., et. al. 1985. Habits of the heart… individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, A. 1987. The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Chavel, C. B. 1976. Nachmanides commentary on the Torah vol. 5. New York: Shilo Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1902] 1959. “The child and the curriculum.” In M. S. Dworkin (ed.), Dewey on education. New York: Teachers College Bureau of Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch, and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1989. “My travels with absolutism and relativism in the curriculum.” Curriculum Inquiry 19(1)
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1982. Cognition and curriculum. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, L. 1959. Sifre on Deuteronomy. New York: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America.
   Google Scholar
• Follesdal, D. 1979. “Hermeneutics and the hypothetico-deductive method.” Dialectica 33 (3–4)
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. 1971. “Curriculum and consciousness.” Teachers College Record 73(2) (December): 253–269. Reprinted in A. A. Bellack and H. M Kliebard (eds.), 1977, Curriculum and evaluation. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Co., 237–253. Pages cited from the reprinted version.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, T. 1989. “Editorial.” Curriculum Inquiry 19(1)
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, A., and Shiloni, Y. 1977. Yalkut shimoni lerabbeinu shimon hadoresh. Jerusalem: Mossad Harrav Kook.
   Google Scholar
• Heschel, A. J. 1962. The theology of ancient fudaism. London: Soncino Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, R. M. 1952. The great conversation. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, A., and Walsh, J. J. (eds.). 1967. Philosophy in the Middle Ages. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. The methodology of scientific research programs.” In A. Musgrave and I. Lakatos (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maclntrye, A. 1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntrye, A. 1988. Whose justice, which rationality. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maimonides, M. [1904] (1956). Guide to the perplexed. Trans. M. Friedlander. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Melammed, E. Z. 1978. Bible commentators. Vols. 1 and 2. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press of the Hebrew University.
   Google Scholar
• Neusner, J. 1987. Sifre to Deuteronomy: An analytic translation. Vol. 1. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. 1965. “Education as Initiation.” In R.D. Archambault (ed.) Philosophical Analysis and Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. 1986. “After the wake: Post-positivist educational thought.” Educational Researcher 12(5): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. 1989. “Absolutism and relativism in the curriculum: A response to Alexander.” Curriculum Inquiry 19(1)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1953. “Two dogmas of empiricism.” In From a logical point of view. New York: Harcourt and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rawidowicz, S. 1957. On interpretation.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Jewish Research 26: 83–126.
   Google Scholar
• Rosensweig, F. 1985. The star of redemption. Trans. W. W. Hallo. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J. P. 1965. Literature and existentialism. 3d ed. New York: The Citadel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. 1961. “Education and the structure of the disciplines.” In I. Westbury and N. Wilkof (eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Silberman, A. M., and Rosenbaum, M. 1934. Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary. Vol. 5. Jerusalem: The Silberman Family.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. 1955. Tractatus theologico-politicus. In R. H. M. Elwes (trans.), The chief works of Benedict de Spinoza. Vol. 1. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1985. “Interpretation and the sciences of man.” In Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2, 15–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A. de. [1840] 1989. Democracy in America. Trans. G. Lawrence. Ed. J. P. Mayer. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1984. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1987. Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. D. (ed). 1969. The essential Descartes. New York: The New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, H. A. 1977. “What is new in Philo?” In From Philo to Spinoza: Two studies in religious philosophy. New York: Behrman House. Reprinted from Philo: Foundations of religious philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veizer, A. 1977. Peirush hatorah lerabbeinu Auraham Ibn Ezra. Vol. 3. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook.
   Google Scholar