Elite rationalities and curricular form: “Meritorious” class reproduction in the elite thinking curriculum in Singapore

References

• Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1979/2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1993/2014). Official knowledge (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2001/2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2002). Does education have independent power? Bernstein and the question of relative autonomy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 607–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2012). Can education change society? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: The middle classes and educational advantage. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, M. D., & Skrbis, Z. (2008). Constructing Singapore: Elitism, ethnicity and the nation-building project. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. (2002). The sacred and the profane in recent struggles to promote official pedagogic identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 617–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1977). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmissions (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1999a). Official knowledge and pedagogic identities. In F. Christie (Ed.) Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp.246–261). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1999b). Pedagogy, identity and the construction of a theory of symbolic control: Basil Bernstein questioned by Joseph Solomon. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 265–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York, NY: Monthly Review.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (1995). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life (J. W. Swain, Trans.). London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D. (2014). “Race-ing class ladies: Lineages of privilege in an elite South African school.” Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 244–261.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, J. (2014). Privileged girls: The place of feminism and feminism in place. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 228–243.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, J., & Lingard, B. (2013). Elite school capitals and girls' schooling: Understanding the (re)production of privilege through a habitus of “assuredness.” In C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Privilege, agency and affect (pp. 50–68). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2009). The best of the best: Becoming elite at an American boarding school. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R., & Howard, A. (Eds.). (2010). Education elites: Class privilege and educational advantage. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K. S. (1979). Report on the Ministry of Education 1978. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heng, S. K. (2011). Keynote speech by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Minister for Education, at the IBM Centennial Dinner, 2 November. Accessed from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2011/11/02/keynote-speech-by-mr-heng-swee-keat-at-ibm-centennial-dinner.php
   Google Scholar
• Ho, L. C., Alviar-Martin, T., Sim, J. B.-Y., & Yap, P. S. (2011). Civic disparities: Exploring students' perceptions of citizenship within Singapore's academic tracks. Theory and Research in Social Education, 39(2), 203–237.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, H. (2008). Learning privilege; Lessons of power and identity in affluent schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, A. (2010). Elite visions: Privileged perceptions of self and others. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 1971–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. (2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul's School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, A. (2002). Towards a critical pedagogy: Creating “thinking schools” in Singapore. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(3), 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, A. (2014). Doing class analysis in Singapore's elite education: Unravelling the smokescreen of “meritocratic talk.” Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 196–210.
   Google Scholar
• Kwek, K. (2007, May 18). Students of top schools worry more about elitism. The Straits Times, p.H18.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y. (1966). New bearings in our education system. Singapore: Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y. (2000). From third world to first: The Singapore story 1965–2000. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2011). Beyond logic and argument analysis: Critical thinking, everyday problems and democratic deliberation in Cambridge International Examinations Thinking Skills curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(6), 783–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore's primary education review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2014). Ideology, rationality and reproduction in education: A critical discourse analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2015). Knowledge, control and critical thinking in Singapore: State ideology and the politics of pedagogic recontextualization. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. H. F., & Tan, J. (1999). The marketisation of education in Singapore: Prospects for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(4), 339–351.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2003). Literacy and the other: A sociological agenda for literacy policy and research. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (1977). The curriculum and cultural reproduction. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauzy, D. K., & Milne, R. S. (2002). Singapore politics under the People's Action Party. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. (2013). Privilege, agency and affect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. D., & Maxwell, M. P. (1995). The reproduction of class in Canada's elite independent schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C., & Kenway, J. (2014). Introduction: Understanding the re-articulations of privilege over time and space. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. (1992a). Thoughts on subject specificity. In S. P. Norris (Ed.), The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal (pp. 198–205). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. (1992b). Teaching critical reasoning through the disciplines: Content versus process. In R. A. Talaska (Ed.), Critical reasoning in contemporary culture (pp. 31–50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (1997). The desired outcomes of education. Singapore: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2011a). Gifted education programme: Rationale and goals. Accessed from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/programmes/gifted-education-programme/rationale-and-goals.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2011b). Integrated programmes (IP). Accessed from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/other/integrated-programme
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2013a). Education statistics digest 2013. Singapore: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2013b). Parliamentary replies: Making every school a good school. Accessed from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/parliamentary-replies/2013/08/making-every-school-a-good-school.php
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). The PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, I. Y. H. (2014). Education and intergenerational mobility in Singapore. Educational Review, 66(3), 362–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds now and what they can do with what they know. Accessed from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (2011). Reflections on the nature of critical thinking, its history, politics, and barriers and on its status across the college/university curriculum: Part I. Inquiry, 26(3), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2005). Critical thinking competency standards. Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Prawat, R. S. (1991). The value of ideas: The immersion approach to the development of thinking. Educational Researcher, 20(2), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, I. (1964). Models and mystery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. (1973). Philosophies-of and the curriculum. In J. F. Doyle (Ed.), Educational judgments: Papers in the philosophy of education (pp. 209–218). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. (2011). Framing educational success: A comparative study of Shanghai and Singapore. Education, Knowledge and Economy, 5(3), 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J. (1993). Independent schools in Singapore: Implications for social and educational inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development, 13(3), 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K. P. (2008). Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review, 29(1), 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teh, L. W. (2014). Singapore's performance in PISA: Leveling up the long tail. In S. K. Lee, W. O. Lee, & E. L. Low (Eds.), Educational policy innovations: Leveling up and sustaining educational achievement (pp. 71–84). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, L., McCarthy, C., & Dimitriadis, G. (Eds.). (2006). Ideology, curriculum, and the new sociology of education: Revisiting the work of Michael Apple. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. (2008). The continuing importance of class analysis. In L. Weis (Ed.) The way class works: Readings on school, family, and the economy (pp. 25–43). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, R., & Nylander, E. (2015). The transnational track: State sponsorship and Singapore's Oxbridge elite. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(1), 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar