448
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Bringing disciplinarity to dialogic discussions: Imaginative entry and disciplinary discourse in a ninth-grade history classroom

References

  • Adler, M., Rougle, E., Kaiser, E., & Caughlan, S. (2003). Closing the gap between concept and practice: Toward more dialogic discussion in the language arts classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(4), 312–322.
  • Alleman, J., & Brophy, J. (2003). History is alive: Teaching young children about changes over time. The Social Studies, 94, 107–110.
  • Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.
  • Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Seixas, P. Sterns, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and knowing history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331–353). New York: New York University Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1979). Art and responsibility. In S. G. Bocharov (Ed.), Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Creation]. ( G. S. Morson & C. Emerson, Trans.). Mosow: Iskusstvo.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. ( C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.
  • Bernstein, M. A. (1994). Foregone conclusions: Against apocalyptic history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Billings, L., & Fitzgerald, J. (2002). Dialogic discussion and the paideia seminar. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 907–941.
  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bridges, D. (1979). Education, democracy, and discussion. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
  • Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 801–827.
  • Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432–463). New York: Macmillan; Collier Macmillan.
  • Center for History and New Media. (2008). NHEC | Browse teaching standards. Retrieved from http://teachinghistory.org/teaching-materials/state-standards?tid=All&tid_1=All&keys=Narrative
  • Collins, J. (1982). Discourse style, classroom interaction, and differential treatment. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 429–437.
  • Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 279–296.
  • Fendler, L. (2008). The upside of presentism. Paedogica Historica, 44(6), 677–690.
  • Forman, E. A., McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (1998). Learning what counts as mathematical exploration. Linguistics and Education, 9, 313–339.
  • Foster, S. J. (1999). Using historical empathy to excite students about the study of history: Can you empathize with Neville Chamberlain? The Social Studies, 90, 18–24.
  • Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 124–159.
  • Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Hess, D. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(1), 10–41.
  • Hess, D. (2004). Discussion in social studies: Is it worth the trouble? Social Education, 68(2), 151–156.
  • Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.
  • Husbands, C., & Pendry, A. (2000). Thinking and feeling: Pupils' preconceptions about the past and historical understanding. In J. Arthur & R. Phillips (Eds.), Issues in history teaching (pp. 125–134). London: Routledge.
  • Jakobson, R. (1971). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In W. De Gruyter (Ed.), Selected writings: Word and language (Vol. 2, pp. 130–147). The Hague: Mouton.
  • Juzwik, M. M. (2006). Performing curriculum: Building ethos through narratives in pedagogical discourse. Teachers College Record, 108(4), 489–528.
  • Juzwik, M. M., Nystrand, M., Kelly, S., & Sherry, M. B. (2008). Oral narrative genres as dialogic resources for classroom literature study. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1111–1154.
  • Langer, L. L. (1991). Holocaust testimonies: The ruins of memory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Leinhardt, G. (1994). History: A time to be mindful. In G. Leinhardt, L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 209–255). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135–176.
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Levstik, L., & Barton, K. C. (2001). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Levstik, L., & Barton, K. C. (2008). Researching history education: Theory, method, and context. New York: Routledge.
  • Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.
  • Morson, G. S. (1994). Narrative and freedom: The shadows of time. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Morson, G. S. (1998). Sideshadowing and tempics. New Literary History, 29(4), 599–624.
  • Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., & Carbonaro, W. J. (2001). On the ecology of classroom instruction: The case of writing in high school English and social studies. In P. Tymjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as learning tool (pp. 57–81). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
  • Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335.
  • Pappas, C., Kiefer, B. Z., & Levstik, L. (1999). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school: An action approach (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
  • Parker, W. C. (2001). Classroom discussion: Models for leading seminars and deliberations. Social Education, 65(2), 111–115.
  • Parker, W. C. (2006). Public discourses in schools: Purposes, problems, possibilities. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 11–18.
  • Parker, W. C. (2010). Listening to strangers: Classroom discussion in democratic education. Teachers College Record, 112(11), 2815–2832.
  • Schrag, P. (1967, January 21). Voices in the classroom: The emasculated voice of the textbook. Saturday Review, p. 74.
  • Schweber, S. (2004). Making sense of the Holocaust. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2012). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson College Indigenous.
  • Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wells, C. G. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50, 244–274.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, H. V. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Wineburg, S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and the academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519.
  • Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Wineburg, S. (2007). Historical thinking matters. Retrieved from http://historicalthinkingmatters.org/why/
  • Wortham, S. E. F. (1994). Acting out participant examples in the classroom. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
  • Wortham, S. E. F. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Wortham, S. E. F. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Young, K. G. (1987). Taleworlds and storyrealms: The phenomenology of narrative. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.