824
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Multigenerational learning for expanding the educational involvement of bilinguals experiencing academic difficulties

References

  • Ahlstroms, K. (2010). On epistemic agency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestizo. San Francisco: Autn Lute.
  • Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan.
  • Artiles, A. J., Waitoller, F., & Neal, R. (2011). Grappling with the intersection of language and ability differences: Equity issues for Chicano/Latino students in special education. In R. Valencia ( Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (3rd ed.). (pp. 213–234.) London: Routledge/Falmer.
  • Baglieri, S., Valle, J. W., Connor, D. J., & Gallagher, D. J., (2010). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267–278.
  • Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (4th ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
  • Bolivar, J. M., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2011). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 4–38.
  • Brandenburg, A. M., & Carroll, M. S. (1995). Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society & Natural Resources, 8, 381–398. doi:10.1080/08941929509380931
  • Buxton, C.A. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science in a “low-performing” urban elementary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 695–721.
  • Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Reframing “science for all” through the politics of poverty. Educational Policy, 12(5), 525–541.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Drake, C., Perez, J. G., St. Louis, K., & George, M. (2004). Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher, 33(4), 3–12.
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73.
  • Cooper, C. W. (2009). Performing cultural work in demographically changing schools: Implications for expanding transformative leadership frameworks. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 694–724.
  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.
  • Duschl, R. A. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72, 51–62.
  • Echevarria, J. (1996). The effects of instructional conversations on the language and concept development of Latino students with learning disabilities. Bilingual Research Journal, 20(2), 339–363.
  • Edwards, A., & Mackenzie, L. (2008). Identity shifts in informal learning trajectories. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, & R. van der Veer ( Eds.), The transforming of learning: Advances in cultural historical activity theory (pp. 163–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction: An International Journal, 1, 243–259.
  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez ( Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263–279.
  • Furman, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2006). Capturing urban student voices in the creation of a science mini-documentary. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 667–694.
  • Gabel, S. L., & Danforth, S. ( Eds.). (2008). Disability & the politics of education: An international reader. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984).Current activity for the future: The zo-ped. In B. Roggoff & J. Wertsch ( Eds.), New directions for child development (pp. 45–63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
  • Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 6(4), 286–303.
  • Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (1991). Exceptional children: Introduction to special education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) (2004). 20 U.S.C. § 1400.
  • Lawson, M. A., & Alameda-Lawson, T. (2012). A case study of school-linked, collective parent engagement. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 651–684.
  • Licht, B. G. (1983). Cognitive-motivational factors that contribute to achievement of learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 483–490.
  • Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51–70.
  • Ishimaru, A., Barajas-López, F., & Bang, M. (2015). Centering family knowledge to develop children's empowered mathematics identities. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 1(4), 1–21.
  • Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2016). And then there is this thing called the curriculum: Organization, imagination, and mind. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 100–104.
  • Landis, D., Umolu, J., & Mancha, S. (2010). The power of language experience for cross-cultural reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 63, 580–589.
  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S.H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 12–21.
  • Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lundahl, M. (2011). Teaching where we are: Placed-based language arts. English Journal, 100, 44–48.
  • Luria, A.R. (1981). Language and cognition. New York: Wiley Intersciences.
  • Luttrell, W. (2010). A camera is a big responsibility: A lens for analyzing children's visual voices. Visual Studies, 25(3), 224–237.
  • Martínez-Álvarez, P. (2016; Online First). Special ways of knowing in science: Expansive learning opportunities with bilingual children with learning disabilities. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9732-x
  • Martínez-Álvarez, P., & Bannan, B. (2014). An exploration of hybrid spaces for place-based geomorphology with Latino bilingual children. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(2), 104–117.
  • Martínez-Álvarez, P., Ghiso, M.P., & Martínez, I. (2013). Creative literacies and learning with Latino emergent bilinguals. LEARNing Landscapes Journal, 11, 273–298.
  • Martínez-Álvarez, P., & Hubard, O. (2015). Modeling change with clay: Bilingual primary students create imaginary landscapes to model slow changes to Earth's surface. Science and Children, 52(5), 57–63.
  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70.
  • Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is 'quality'?'': Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.
  • Monk, H. (2014). Intergenerational family dialogues: A cultural historical tool involving family members as co-researchers working with visual data. In M. Fleer & A. Ridgway ( Eds.), Visual methodologies and digital tools for researching with young children: Transforming visuality (pp. 73–88). New York: Springer.
  • Moore, B. A., & Klingner, J. K. (2014). Considering the needs of English language learner populations: An examination of the population validity of reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(5) 391–408.
  • Moll, L. C. ( Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moll, L. C. (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M. L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan ( Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in literacy research (pp. 211–244). Urbana: National Conference on Research in English and National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Moll, L. C., Veléz-Ibáñez, C., & Greenberg, J. (1989). Year one progress report: Community knowledge and classroom practice: Combining resources for literacy instruction ( IARP Subcontract L-10, Development Associates). Tucson: University of Arizona.
  • National Research Council (2011, 2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework of new K-12 science education standards. Board on Science Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington: National Academies Press.
  • Nieto, S. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington: National Academies Press. Retrieved from www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-sciencestandards.
  • Ortiz, A., & Wilkinson, C., (1991). AIM for the BEST: Assessment and intervention model for the bilingual exceptional child. Austin: University of Texas.
  • Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307.
  • Ovando, C., Collier, V., & Combs, M. (2003). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching multicultural contexts (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Pérez Carreón, G., Drake, C., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 465–498.
  • Reschly, D. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, Secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 510–515.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky's neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.
  • Smith, N., & Fucigna, C. (1993). Experience and art. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Smith, G., & Sobel, D. (2010). Bring it on home. Educational Leadership, 68, 38–43.
  • Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516.
  • Tolman, C. W. (1999). Society versus context in individual development: Does theory make a difference? In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki ( Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 70–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Torgesen, J. L., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities. Disabilities, 34, 33–58, 78.
  • Trueba, H. (2002). Multiple ethnic, racial, and cultural identities in action: From marginality to a new cultural capital in modern society. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(1), 7–28.
  • Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Korzh, A., & Wentland, A. (2007). “They probably aren't named Rachel”: Young children's scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 559–592.
  • U.S. Department of Education (2006). 26th annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act, 2004. Washington: Westat.
  • VanDerHeyden, A., Kovaleski, J. F., Shapiro, E. S., & Painter, D. T., (2014). Scientifically supported identification of SLD using RTI: A response to Colker. Journal of Law and Education, 43(2), 229–247.
  • Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 140–147.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol 4, The history of the development of higher mental functions. (R. W. Rieber, Ed. & M. J. Hall, Trans.). New York: Plenum.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.