The politics of curriculum reforms in Asia: Inter-referencing discourses of power, culture and knowledge

References

• Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2013). Can education change society? New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2014). Official knowledge (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W., Gandin, L. A., Liu, S., Meshulam, A., & Schirmer, E. (2018). The struggle for democracy in education: Lessons from social reality. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the social imaginary. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. A., & Li, C. (Eds.). (2013). The East Asian challenge for democracy: Political meritocracy in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-S. (2010). South Korea under compressed modernity: Familial political economy in transition. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H. (Ed.). (1999). Trajectories: Inter-Asia cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H., & Chua, B. H. (Eds.). (2007). The inter-Asia cultural studies reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (2010). Disrupting hegemonic liberalism in East Asia. Boundary 2, 37(2), 199–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In S. J. Collier & A. Ong (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–21). Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (Eds.). (2009). Small country innovation systems: Globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R., & Thiessen, D. (2012). Editorial: Fomenting flows and internationalizing curriculum studies. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinathan, S. (1996). Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 16(11), 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, C.-Y. (2016). Ambiguity as deliberate strategy: The “de-politicized” discourse of national identity in the Taiwanese citizenship curriculum. Critical Studies in Education, 57(3), 394–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenway J., & Fahey, J. (Eds.). (2009). Globalising the research imagination. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, E. M., & Susana, C. G. (2005). Education reforms in East Asia: Policy, process and impact. In East Asia decentralizes: Making local government work (pp. 179–208). Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, A. (2010). Tactical globalization: Learning from the Singapore experiment. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, A., & Kenway, J. (2012). Cultivating national leaders in an elite school: Deploying the transnational in the national interest. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(4), 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, M., & Vickers, E. (Eds.). (2009). Education as a political tool in Asia. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S. (2016). National education in Hong Kong: Curriculum as a site of struggle between “one country” and “two systems”. In L. Lim & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The strong state and curriculum reform in Asia: Assessing the politics and possibilities of educational change in Asia (pp. 77–93). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y. (2000). From third world to first: The Singapore story 1965–2000. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2016). Knowledge, control and critical thinking in Singapore: State ideology and the politics of pedagogic recontextualization. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L., & Apple, M. W. (2015). Elite rationalities and curricular form: “Meritorious” class reproduction in the elite thinking curriculum in Singapore. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(5), 472–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L., & Apple, M. W. (Eds.). (2016). The strong state and curriculum reform in Asia: Assessing the politics and possibilities of educational change in Asia. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. (2012). Towards transformation of knowledge and subjectivity in curriculum inquiry: Insights from Chen Kuan-Hsing's “Asia as Method”. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(1), 153–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., Freebody, P., Shun, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2005). Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mahbubani, K. (2008). The new Asian hemisphere: The irresistible shift of global power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mizoguchi, Y. (1996/1989). China as method (S. Li, Y. Gong, & T. Xu Trans.). Beijing: Chinese People's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K. H. (Ed.). (2006). Education reform and education policy in East Asia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A.-H. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2017). Knowledge production with Asia-centric research methodology. Comparative Education Review, 61(4), 760–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, J.-E. (2013). Methodology of leaving America for Asia: Reading South Korea's social studies textbooks through Chen Kuan-Hsing's Asia as Method. Qualitative Research in Education 2(3), 328–354.
   Google Scholar
• Robison, R. (Ed.). (2012). Routledge handbook on Southeast Asian politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G. (2012). Consultative authoritarianism and regime change analysis: Implications of the Singapore case. In R. Robison (Ed.), Routledge handbook on Southeast Asian politics (pp. 120–134). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2007). New trajectories for political regimes in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), 767–772.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M. (2011). Imagining neo-liberalism and the hidden realities of the politics of reform: Teachers and students in a globalized Japan. In D. B. Willis & J. Rappleye (Eds.), Reimaging Japanese education: Borders, transfers, circulations and the comparative (pp. 225–246). Oxford: Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. (2016). Provincializing and globalizing critical studies of school knowledge: Insights from the Japanese history textbook controversy over “comfort women”. In L. Lim & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The strong state and curriculum reform in Asia: Assessing the politics and possibilities of educational change in Asia (pp. 161–79). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K., Heimans, S., Amazan, R., & Maniam, V. (2016). Doing southern theory: Towards alternative knowledges and knowledge practices in/for education. Postcolonial Directions in Education, 5(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K., Sriprakash, A., & Connell, R. (2016). Toward a postcolonial comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 61(1), 1––24.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, Y. (2005/1960). Asia as method. In R. F. Calichman (Trans.) (Ed.), What is modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi (pp. 149–65). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(7), 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Chan, P. W. K., & Kenway, J. (Eds.). (2015). Asia as method in education: A defiant research imagination. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar