Precarious, debilitated and ordinary: Rethinking (in)capacity for inclusion

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance to new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63. doi: 10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcon, N. (1991). The theoretical subjects of this bridge called my back and Anglo-American feminism. In H. Claderon & J. D. Saldivar (Eds.), Studies in Chicano literature, culture and ideology (pp. 28–41). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, J. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: Pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldua, G. (1987). Borderlands, la frontera: The new mestiza (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, F. (1999). Inclusion, curriculum and the struggle for space in school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(1), 75–87. doi: 10.1080/136031199285200
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, C. (2012). Disability studies and inclusive teacher preparation: A socially just path for teacher education. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(2), 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, S. (2012). School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice (pp. 3–9). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baglieri, S., Bejoian, L. M., Broderick, A. A., Connor, D. J., & Valle, J. W. (2011). [Re]claiming “inclusive education” toward cohesion in educational reform: Disability studies unravels the myth of the normal child. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2122–2154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 120–154). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K. (2015). Neoliberalism: The whys and wherefores…and future directions. Sociology Compass, 9(7), 571–584. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, T., Nes, K., & Strømstad, M. (2003). Developing inclusive teacher education: Drawing the book together. In T. Booth, K. Nes, & M. Strømstad (Eds.), Developing inclusive teacher education (pp. 167–178). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, A. (2018). Equality of what? The capability approach and the right to education for persons with disabilities. Social Inclusion, 6(1), 29–39. doi: 10.17645/si.v6i1.1193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Studying teacher preparation: The questions that drive research. European Educational Research Journal, 14(5), 379–394. doi: 10.1177/1474904115590211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6–27. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2013.739015
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. L. (2013). Ability profiling and school failure: One child’s struggle to be seen as competent (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. J., Ferri, B.A., & Annamma, S. A. (2016). DisCrit—Disability studies and critical race theory in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S. (Ed.). (2014). Becoming a great inclusive educator. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S., & Gabel, S. (2006). Vital questions facing disability studies in education. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S., Taff, S., & Ferguson, P. M. (2006). Place, profession and program in the history of special education curriculum. In E. Brantlinger (Ed.), Who benefits from special education: Fixing other people’s children (pp. 1–26). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley-Marling, C. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482–489. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370060201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, D. L. (1994). Is communication really the point? Some thoughts on interventions and membership. Mental Retardation, 32(1), 7–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, P. M. (2008). The doubting dance: Contributions to a history of parent/professional interactions in early 20th century America. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33(1–2), 48–58. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. M., & Nussbaum, E. (2012). Disability studies: What is it and what difference does it make? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37, 70–80. doi: 10.2511/027494812802573530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, S. (2002). Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2), 177–201. doi: 10.1111/1467-873X.00222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, S. (Ed.). (2005). Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, S. L., Cohen, C. J., Kotel, K., & Pearson, H. (2013). Intellectual disability and space: Critical narratives of exclusion. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 74–80. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-51.01.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. (2004). Entering the conversation: The debate behind the debates in special education. In D. J. Gallagher, L. Heshusius, R. P. Iano, & T. M. Skrtic (Eds.), Challenging orthodoxy in special education: Dissenting voices (pp. 3–26). Denver: Love Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. (2006). If not absolute objectivity, then what? A reply to Kauffman and Sasso. Exceptionality, 14(2), 91–107. doi: 10.1207/s15327035ex1402_3
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S. L. (2004). Defining the future: An interrogation of education and time. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 323–340. doi: 10.1080/0142569042000216972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grech, S. (2011). Recolonialising debates or perpetuating coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2010.496198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamraie, A. (2017). Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S., Dixon, A., Drummond, M. J., & McIntyre, D. (2004). Learning without limits. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, T., Figueora, R., Gamm, S., Katzman, L. I., Gruner, A., Karger, J., & Hernandez, J. (2005). Comprehensive management review and evaluation of special education. New York: New York City Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(7), 403–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, A. (1996). The color of privilege: Three blasphemies on race and feminism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Idea Data Center (2019). Retrieved from https://ideadata.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist queer crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M., & Sasso, G. M. (2006). Toward ending cultural and cognitive relativism in special education. Exceptionality, 14(2), 65–90. doi: 10.1207/s15327035ex1402_2
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, M. A., & Beech, J. (2014). Spatial theorizing in comparative and international education research. Comparative Education Review, 58(2), 191–214. doi: 10.1086/675499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. doi: 10.3102/0091732X09358129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, D. (2004). “Some parents just don’t care”: Decoding the meanings of parental involvement in urban schools. Urban Education, 39(1), 91–107. doi: 10.1177/0042085903259290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, “world”-traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia, 2(2), 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.x
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1993). Politics and space/time. In M. Keith & S. Pile (Eds.), Place and politics of identity (pp. 139–159). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1994). Double articulation: A place in the world. In A. Bammer (Ed.), Displacements: Cultural identities in question (pp. 139–159). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D., Bond, S., & Featherstone, D, with the Human Geography Research Group. (2009). The possibilities of a politics of place beyond place? A conversation with Doreen Massey. Scottish Geographical Journal, 125 (3–4), 401–420. doi: 10.1080/14702540903364443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, L. (2016). Beginning teachers and inclusive education: Frustrations, dilemmas and growth. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 383–396. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1081635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, S. (2009). Engaging with teachers’ knowledge: Promoting inclusion in Zambian schools. Disability & Society, 24(5), 611–624. doi: 10.1080/09687590903010990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. C. (2011). A feminist account of global responsibility. Social Theory and Practice, 37(3), 391–412. doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract201137324
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2008). Institutional and self-stories: Investigating peer interpretations of significant disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5–6), 525–542. doi: 10.1080/13603110802377581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2010). Disentangling the social threads in a communicative environment: A cacophonous tale of alternative and augmentative communication (AAC). European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25 (3), 253–267. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2010.492936
   Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2014). Agency in real time? Situating teachers’ efforts towards inclusion in the context of local and enduring struggles. Teachers College Record, 116(6), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2016a, published online). “Real” reading: Reconciling explicit instruction with inclusive pedagogy in a fourth-grade classroom. Urban Education.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2016b). Spatializing student learning to re-imagine the “place” of inclusion. Teachers College Record, 118(12), 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2016c). Inclusive education complexly defined for teacher preparation: The significance and uses of error. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(9), 946–961. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1134682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S. (2017). Teaching for inclusion: Eight principles for effective and equitable practice. (A. J. Artiles & E. B. Kozleski (Eds.)), New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naraian, S., & Oyler, C. (2014). Professional development for special education reform: Re-articulating experiences of urban educators. Urban Education, 49(5), 499–526. doi: 10.1177/0042085913478623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S., & Schlessinger, S. (2018). Becoming an inclusive educator: Agentive maneuverings in collaboratively taught classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraian, S., Chacko, M., Feldman, C., & Schwitzman, T. (in press). Emergent concepts of inclusion in the context of committed school leadership. Education and Urban Society.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J., Hicks, D., & Fall, A. (2009). Time and exclusion. Disability & Society, 24(3), 373–385. doi: 10.1080/09687590902789552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. doi: 10.3102/0034654311413609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary (2019). Incapacity. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/incapacity
   Google Scholar
• Oyler, C. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive and critical (special) education. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 34(3), 201–218. doi: 10.1177/0888406411406745
   Google Scholar
• Pantic, N. (2015). A model for study of teacher agency for social justice. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 759–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillip, T. M., & Benin, S. Y. (2014). Programs of teacher education as mediators of white teacher identity. Teaching Education, 25(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2012.743985
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2015). The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain. Hypatia, 30(1), 268–284. doi: 10.1111/hypa.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2009). Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 19(2), 161–172. doi: 10.1080/07407700903034147
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, N. (2006). Promoting ‘epistemic fissures’: Disability studies in teacher education. Teaching Education, 17(3), 251–264. doi: 10.1080/10476210600849722
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic, T. (Ed.). (1995). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, J. (2014). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 133–180.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J. (2006). Before it had a name. In S. Danforth & S. Gabel (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (pp. xiii–xxiii). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urwick, J., & Elliott, J. (2010). International orthodoxy versus national realities: Inclusive schooling and the education of children with disabilities in Lesotho. Comparative Education, 46(2), 137–150. doi: 10.1080/03050061003775421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle, J., & Connor, D. (2011). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Varenne, H., & McDermott, R. (1998). Successful failure: The school America builds. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psycho-logical processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walcott, D. M. (2011). Chancellor’s memo. In Principals' weekly (pp. 2–3). New York: NYC Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). The capability approach: Its potential for work in education. In M. Walker & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education (pp. 1–18). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, L. (2010). Disability studies in education. In S. Tozer, B. P. Gallegos, A. Henry, M. B. Greiner, & P. G. Price (Eds.), Handbook of research in the social foundations of education (pp. 244–260). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization & World Bank (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar