Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review

References

• Anderson, S. F. 1977. Childbirth as a pathological process: An American perspective. MCN. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 2 (4):240–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arms, S. 1975. Immaculate deception: A new look at women and childbirth in America. Boston, United-States of America: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Beynon, C. L. 1957. The normal second stage of labour a plea for reform in its conduct. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 64 (6):815–20. doi:10.1111/bjo.1957.64.issue-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bick, D. E., K. M. Ismail, S. Macdonald, P. Thomas, S. Tohill, and C. Kettle. 2012. How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 12 (1):57. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, B., S. Alexander, R. I. Bjarnadóttir, M. Gissler, J. Langhoff‐Roos, Ž. Novak‐Antolič, C. Prunet, W.-H. Zhang, A. D. Hindori-Mohangoo, and J. Zeitlin. 2016. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: A study based on routine national data in Euro‐peristat project. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 95 (7):746–54. doi:10.1111/aogs.12894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. 1973. Our bodies, ourselves: A book by and for Women. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, S. A. 1978. The osler medal essay. The life and times of sir fielding ould: Man-midwife and master physician. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 52 (2):228–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomall, A. E. 1878. The operation of episiotomy as a prevention of perineal ruptures during labor. The American Journal Of Obstetrics and Diseases Of Women and Children (1869-1919) 11 (3):517.
   Google Scholar
• Carroli, G., and J. Belizan. 1999. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3, CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroli, G., and L. Mignini. 2009. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1, CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I., M. Enkin, and M. Keire. 1989. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charrier, P., and G. Clavandier. 2013. Sociologie de la naissance. Paris: Armand Collin.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary-Goldman, J., and J. N. Robinson. 2003. The role of episiotomy in current obstetric practice. Seminars in Perinatology 27 (1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clesse, C., J. Lighezzolo-Alnot, S. de Lavergne, S. de Lavergne, and M. Scheffler. 2018a. Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care for Women International 39 (6):644–62. doi:10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clesse, C., J. Lighezzolo-Alnot, S. Hamlin, S. de Lavergne, and M. Scheffler. 2018b. History of childbirth in the Western world: Evolution of knowledge, techniques, beliefs, rites and professional practices throughout the ages. Devenir 30 (4):399-417.
   Google Scholar
• Clesse, C., J. Lighezzolo-Alnot, S. Hamlin, S. De Lavergne, and M. Scheffler. 2016. The practice of episiotomy in France 10 years after the recommendations of CNGOF: What inventory? Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite 44 (4):232–38. doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.02.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coogan, R., and E. P. Edmunds. 1977. The unkindest cut? Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology 49:55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, F. G., P. MacDonald, N. Gant, K. Leveno, and L. Gilstrap. 1989. Williams Obstetrics. 19th ed. Connecticut: Appleton & Lang, Norwalk.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H. G., C. S. E. Homer, N. Leap, and S. K. Tracy. 2011. From social to surgical: Historical perspectives on perineal care during labour and birth. Women and Birth : Journal of the Australian College of Midwives 24 (3):105–11. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2010.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen, H. G., H. Priddis, and C. Thornton. 2015. Severe perineal trauma is rising but let us not overreact. Midwifery 31 (1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLee, J. B. 1920. The prophylactic forceps operation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1:34–44. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(20)90067-4.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, S. G., and A. S. Chacham. 2004. “The cut above” and “the cut below”: The abuse of caesareans and episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters 12 (23):100–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnison, J. 1977. Midwives and medical men: A history of inter-professional rivalries and women’s rights. New York: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Drife, J. 2002. The start of life: A history of obstetrics. Postgraduate Medical Journal 78 (919):311–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, N. J. 1950. Williams Obstetrics: A textbook for the use of students. 10th ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Ekéus, C., E. Nilsson, and K. Gottvall. 2008. Increasing incidence of anal sphincter tears among primiparas in Sweden: A population‐based register study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 87 (5):564–73. doi:10.1080/00016340802030629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Chalmers, I. Enkin, E., and Mark, J. 2000. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, S., E. E. Benjamin, and G. Edwards. 2009. Using evidence to reduce the rate of episiotomy in a Dubai hospital. Evidence-Based Midwifery 7 (2):60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Flew, J. D. S. 1944. Episiotomy. British Medical Journal 2 (4375):620–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg, J., M. D. Holtz, T. Hyslop, and J. E. Tolosa. 2002. Has the use of routine episiotomy decreased? Examination of episiotomy rates from 1983 to 2000. Obstetrics & Gynaecology 99 (3):395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goueslard, K., J. Cottenet, A. Roussot, C. Clesse, P. Sagot, and C. Quantin. 2018. How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 18 (1):208. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1768-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, D. I. 1997. Episiotomy: Challenging obstetric intervention. New-York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, I. 1996. I believe therefore I practise. The Lancet 347 (8993):4–5. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91550-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, I. D. 1998. Processes of change in obstetrics: A cross-national case-study of episiotomy. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 2 (4):403–33. doi:10.1177/136345939800200407.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, I. D., and D. Fawler Graham. 1997. Episiotomy counts: Trends and prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994. Birth (Berkeley, California) 24 (3):141–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, I. D., G. Carroli, C. Davies, and J. M. Medves. 2005). Episiotomy rates around the world: An update. Birth (Berkeley, California) 32 (3):219–23. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00373.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haire, D. (1972) The cultural warping of childbirth: A special report on US obstetrics prepared for International Childbirth Education Association. Minneapolis: Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. F., M. Brennan, P. M. North, J. V. Reed, and E. A. Wickham. 1984. Is routine episiotomy necessary? British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 288 (6435):1971–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner, G., Thorp, J., Lohr, and K N. 2005. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: A systematic review. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association. 293(17):2141–48. doi:10.1001/jama.293.17.2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, S. A. A. A., A. Dahlen, and V. Schmied. 2012. What makes episiotomy rates Change?:A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Childbirth 2 (1):29–39. doi:10.1891/2156-5287.2.1.29.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquetin, B. 2006. Introduction. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 35 (Suppl 1):7–9. doi:10.1016/S0368-2315(06)76492-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobi, P. 2003. Are you happy with the epi(siotomy)? The Israel Medical Association Journal : IMAJ 5:581–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., X. Qian, G. Carroli, and P. Garner. 2017. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. The Cochrane Library.
   Google Scholar
• Kalis, V., K. Laine, J. W. De Leeuw, K. M. Ismail, and D. G. Tincello. 2012. Classification of episiotomy: Towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 119 (5):522–26. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03268.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, S., Ed. 1972. Episiotomy: Physical and emotional aspects. London, UK: National Childbirth Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, S. 1979a. Episiotomy controversy. Midwife Health Visit Com Nurse 15 (6):233–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitzinger, S. 1979b. The good birth guide. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, S. 1999. Sheila Kitzinger’s letter from Europe: Obstetric metaphors and marketing. Birth (Berkeley, California) 26:55–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 1988. Episiotomy and the second stage of labour. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien 34:2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. C. 1995. Studying episiotomy: When beliefs conflict with science. The Journal of Family Practice 41 (5):483–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. C. 2010. What do episiotomy and cesarean have to do with copernicus, galileo, and newton? Birth (Berkeley, California) 37 (1):1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00371.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. C., C. Sakala, P. Simkin, R. Davis-Floyd, J. P. Rooks, and J. Pincus. 2006. Why do women go along with this stuff? Birth (Berkeley, California) 33 (3):245–50. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00110.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. C., P. A. Janssen, L. MacWilliams, J. Kaczorowski, and B. Johnson. 1997. Determinants of vaginal-perineal integrity and pelvic floor functioning in childbirth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 176:403–10. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70506-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhimannil, K. B., P. Karaca-Mandic, C. J. Blauer-Peterson, N. T. Shah, and J. M. Snowden. 2017. Uptake and utilization of practice guidelines in hospitals in the United States: The case of routine episiotomy. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety/Joint Commission Resources 43 (1):41–48. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappen, J. R., and D. R. Gosset. 2010. Changes in episiotomy practice: Evidence-based medicine in action. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 5 (3):301–09. doi:10.1586/eog.10.21.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gøtzsche, J. P. Ioannidis, and D. Moher. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine 6 (7):e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljestrand, J. 2003. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Geneva: The WHO Reproductive Health Library. accessed April 25, 2017). http://apps.who.int/rhl/pregnancy_childbirth/childbirth/2nd_stage/jlcom/fr/.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, L. D. 1995. A treatise of midwifry, in three parts. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 172 (4):1317–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwenstein L, Drugan A, Gonen R, Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Bardicef, M., and Jakobi, P. 2005. Episiotomy: Beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 123(2):179–82. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauriceau, F. 1995. Des maladies des femmes grosses et accouchées. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 172 (3):1060–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehl, L. E. 1976. Options in maternity care. Women & Health 2 (2):29–42. doi:10.1300/J013v02n02_05.
   Google Scholar
• Montini, T. 2000. Book review. Women & Health 30 (4):137–39. doi:10.1300/J013v30n04_10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, N. 1981. A very common operation. Editorial. Midwife Health Visit Com Nurse 17:3.
   Google Scholar
• Moutquin, J. M. 2004. Médecine périnatale, vers un nouveau défi: Concilier progrès technologique et éthique. Santé, Société Et Solidarité 3 (1):75–79. doi:10.3406/oss.2004.1225.
   Google Scholar
• Muhleman, M. A., I. Aly, A. Walters, N. Topale, R. S. Tubbs, and M. Loukas. 2017. To cut or not to cut, that is the question: A review of the anatomy, the technique, risks and benefits of an episiotomy. Clinical Anatomy 30 (3):362–72. doi:10.1002/ca.22836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers-Helfgott, M. G., and A. W. Helfgott. 1999. Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics. Should it be performed? Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 26 (2):305–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1975. The trap of medicalised motherhood. New Society 134 (689):639–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ould, F. 1742. A treatise of midwifery in three parts. Irlande: Oli, Nelson and Charles Connor.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R. H. 1918. Shall we cut and reconstruct the perineum for every primipara. Transactions of the American Gynecology Association 43:201–06.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R. H. 1918. Shall we cut and reconstruct the perineum for every primipara. Transactions Of The American Gynecol Assoc 43:201.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, J., P. R. Macdonald, and N. Gant. 1985. Williams obstetrics. 17th ed. Connecticut: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Röckner, G., and A. Fianu‐Jonasson. 1999. Changed pattern in the use of episiotomy in Sweden. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 106 (2):95–101. doi:10.1111/bjo.1999.106.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon, P. G. 2001. A guest editorial: Episiotomy: Yea or nay. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 56 (11):667–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, A., R. Gabbay Benziv, L. Hiersch, E. Ashwal, R. Aviram, Y. Yogev, and A. Aviram. 2017. Episiotomy–Risk factors and outcomes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine : The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 30 (3):251–56. doi:10.3109/14767058.2016.1169527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia JO, Elbourne, D, Spencer, J, and Chalmers, I. 1984. West Berkshire perineal management trial. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 289 (6445):587–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotland, N. L. 2004. Women’s bodies, Doctor’s dynamics. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry 32 (1):181–91. doi:10.1521/jaap.32.1.181.28333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tew, M. 1990. Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, S. B., and H. D. Banta. 1983. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: An interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 38 (6):322–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentini, H. 2004. Notre force de changement: L’évolution de la périnatalité au Quebec 1973–2003. Santé, Société Et Solidarité 3 (1):49–55. doi:10.3406/oss.2004.1221.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. 2001. Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 75:S25–S37. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00519-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way, S. 1998. Social construction of episiotomy. Journal of Clinical Nursing 7:113–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. W. 1885. The operation of episiotomy. New York Medical Journal 42 (15):176-80.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, J. 1980. Too many episiotomies. Midwives Chronicle 93 (1105):46–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woolley, R. J. 1995. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: A review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part I and II. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 50 (11):806–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation (1996) Care in normal birth: A practical guide. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/63167/1/WHO_FRH_MSM_96.24.pdf ( accessed April 28, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2018) Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf ( Accessed May 29, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, P. S. 2002. Childbirth in Taiwan is certainly overmedicalized. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 325:103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar