Measurement invariance by race (black, white) of the femininity ideology scale-short form

References

• Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2000. Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31 (2):187–212. doi:10.1177/0022022100031002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 9:233–55. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., and R. S. Lau. 2012. A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods 15 (2):167–98. doi:10.1177/1094428111421987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R., and A. N. Zucker. 2007. Black and white women’s perspectives on femininity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 13 (1):1–9. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conway, M., and L. R. Vartanian. 2000. A status account of gender stereotypes: Beyond communality and agency. Sex Roles 43 (3/4):181–99. doi:10.1023/A:1007076813819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, U. 2017. Femmebodiment: Notes on queer feminine shapes of vulnerability. Feminist Theory 18 (1):35–53. doi:10.1177/1464700116683902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. V. 1998. A comparative analysis of African Americans and European-Americans perceived gender roles using the femininity ideology scale. Unpublished master’s thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Gronemeyer, K.M. 1998. Age-related differences in endorsement of traditional femininity roles using the Femininity Ideology Scale. Master's thesis, Florida Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, E. L., K. Deaux, and N. Lofaro. 2016. The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 (3):353–63. doi:10.1177/0361684316634081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A. 2017. Femme theory: Refocusing the intersectional lens. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice 38:95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A. 2020. “Femininity? It’s the aesthetic of subordination”: Examining femmephobia, the gender binary, and experiences of oppression among sexual and gender minorities. Archives of Sexual Behavior 49 (7):2319–39. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01641-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerald, M. C., L. M. Ward, L. Moss, K. Thomas, and K. D. Fletcher. 2017. Subordinates, sex objects, or sapphires? Investigating contributions of media use to Black students’ femininity ideologies and stereotypes about Black women. Journal of Black Psychology 43 (6):608–35. doi:10.1177/0095798416665967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, J. 2000. A validity study of the femininity ideology scale. Unpublished master’s thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R., K. Richmond, S. Cook, A. T. House, and M. Aupont. 2007. The femininity ideology scale: Factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and social contextual variation. Sex Roles 57 (5–6):373–83. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9258-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., and K. Richmond. 2016. The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. In APA handbooks in psychology series. APA handbook of men and masculinities, ed. Y. J. Wong and S. R. Wester, 23–49. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14594-002.
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., K. M. Alto, D. K. McKelvey, K. A. Richmond, and R. C. McDermott. 2017. Variance composition, measurement invariance by gender, and construct validity of the femininity ideology scale-short form. Journal of Counseling Psychology 64 (6):708–23. doi:10.1037/cou0000230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majors, R., and J. M. Billson. 1993. Cool pose: The dilemma of Black manhood in America. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. C., R. F. Levant, J. H. Hammer, R. J. Hall, D. K. McKelvey, and Z. Jones. 2017. Further examination of the factor structure of the male role norms inventory-short form (MRNI-SF): Measurement considerations for women, men of color, and gay men. Journal of Counseling Psychology 64 (6):724–38. doi:10.1037/cou0000225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998-2015. Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, C. D., and F. Drasgow. 2011. Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: Understanding the practical importance of differences between groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (5):966–80. doi:10.1037/a0022955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, C. D., J. Bradburn, J. Olenick, C. Bialko, and F. Drasgow. 2018. How big are my effects? Examining the magnitude of effect sizes in studies of measurement equivalence. Organizational Research Methods 22 (3):678–709. doi:10.1177/1094428118761122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, K., R. Levant, B. Smalley, and S. Cook. 2015. The femininity ideology scale (FIS): Dimensions and its relationship to anxiety and feminine gender role stress. Women & Health 55 (3):263–79. doi:10.1080/03630242.2014.996723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. 2007. Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society 36 (1):85–102. doi:10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L., and M. V. Porche. 2000. The adolescent femininity ideology scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly 24 (4):365–76. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00219.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, M., and M.H. Lai. 2018. Testing factorial invariance with unbalanced samples. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 25 (2):201–13. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1387859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar