The development of pressure scale toward marriage and fertility in social structure

References

• Akyüz, H. E. 2018. Yapı geçerliliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi: Uygulamalı bir çalışma. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 7 (2):186–98. doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.414490.
   Google Scholar
• Albayrak, E., and O. Günay. 2007. State and trait anxiety levels of childless women in Kayseri, Turkey. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 12 (4):385–90. doi:10.1080/13625180701475665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunışık, R., R. Coşkun, and E. Yıldırım. 2010. SPSS applied research methods in social Sciences. Sakarya: Sakarya Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Atak, H., C. E. Tatlı, G. Çokamay, H. Büyükpabuşcu, and F. Çok. 2016. Yetişkinliğe geçiş: Türkiye’de demografik ölçütler bağlamında kuramsal bir gözden geçirme. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 8 (3):204–27. doi:10.18863/pgy.238184.
   Google Scholar
• Beaujouan, E., and A. Solaz. 2013. Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 29 (1):39–67. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9271-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellieni, C. 2016. The best age for pregnancy and undue pressures. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health 10 (3):104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beşpinar, F. U., and L. Z. Beşpinar. 2017. The dual picture of household structures and marriage practices in Turkey: Reflections of tradition as well as change. Journal of Population Studies 39 (1):109–49.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models, ed. K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, 136–62. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E., and M. Patrick. 2018. Time, anticipation, and the life course: Egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. American Sociological Review 83 (5):959–82. doi:10.1177/0003122418796807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. 2017. The data analysis manual for the social sciences. 23th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Çapık, C. 2014. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalişmalarinda doğrulayici faktör analizinin kullanimi. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 17 (3):196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Çapık, C., S. Gözüm, and S. Aksayan. 2018. Intercultural scale adaptation phases, language and culture adaptation: An updated guide. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing 26 (3):199–210. doi:10.26650/FNJN397481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S., B. K. Park, and E. S. Nahm. 2018. The Korean eHealth literacy scale (K-Eheals): Reliability and validity testing in younger adults recruited online. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20 (4):e138. doi:10.2196/jmir.8759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. L. 1992. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research 5 (4):194–7. doi:10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4.
   Google Scholar
• Deniş, H., and A. G. Balım. 2012. The process of adapting the scientific creativity scale into Turkish and its evaluation criteria. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences 5 (2):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. 2014. Scale development theory and applications. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, M. Y. 2021. The biological clock: Age, risk, and the biopolitics of reproductive time. Sex Roles 84 (11):765–78. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01198-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A., N. Bhan, T. Benmarhnia, E. Reed, S. M. Kiene, J. Silvermanand, and A. Raj. 2021. The association between early in marriage fertility pressure from in-laws’ and family planning behaviors, among married adolescent girls in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. Reproductive Health 18 (1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01116-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, K., and C. Stockstill. 2018. The condensed courtship clock: How elite women manage self-development and marriage ideals. Socius 4:2378023117753485. doi:10.1177/2378023117753485.
   Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. 2006. Structural equation modelling. North Carolina: G. David Garson and Statistical Associates Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gatignon, H. 2011. Statistical analysis of management data. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1270-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. 2018. Türkiye demographic and health survey (TDHS). Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.C. Presidency of Strategy and Budget and TUBITAK. Accessed April 20, 2020. http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2018/rapor/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycı, S. 2010. SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques. 5th ed. Ankara: Asil Publication Distribution.
   Google Scholar
• Karakoç, F. Y., and L. Dönmez. 2014. Basic principles in scale development studies. World of Medical Education 13 (40):39–49. doi:10.25282/ted.228738.
   Google Scholar
• Kavas, S., and A. Thornton. 2013. Adjustment and hybridity in Turkish family change: Perspectives from developmental idealism. Journal of Family History 38 (2):223–41. doi:10.1177/0363199013482263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, K. 2015. The ticking of the“biological clock”: Worry about future fertility in nulliparous women. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements forPhd thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University. ProQuest Number: 372493.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Hypothesis Testing. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Vols. 192–209. 3rd ed. 342. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavender, T., J. Logan, A. Cooke, R. Lavender, and T. A. Mills. 2015. Nature makes you blind to the risks”: An exploration of womens’ views surrounding decisions on the timing of childbearing in contemporary society. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 6 (3):157–63. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2015.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., and A. O. Tsui. 1996. Marriage timing in Sri Lanka: The role of modern norms and ideas. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58 (2):476–90. doi:10.2307/353511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. J. 2017. Pushing for the perfect time: Social and biological fertility. Women’s Studies International Forum 62:91–8. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, H. L., J. G. Silverman, K. A. Jones, D. J. Tancredi, M. R. Decker, M. C. McCormick, S. B. Austin, H. A. Anderson, and E. Miller. 2017. Psychometric properties and refinement of the reproductive coercion scale. Contraception 95 (3):292–8. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano, L. 2016. Single women and the transition to marriage in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Tokyo. Asian Journal of Social Science 44 (3):363–90. doi:10.1163/15685314-04403005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nargund, G. 2009. Declining birth rate in developed countries: A radical policy re-think is required. Facts, Views & Vision in Obgyn 1 (3):191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Özdamar, K. 2009. Statistical data analysis with packet programs. 7th ed. Eskisehir, Turkey: Kaan Bookstore.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., and C. T. Beck. 2006. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health 29 (5):489–97. doi:10.1002/nur.20147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiya, H. A., K. I. Pargament, A. Mahoney, and C. Stein. 2008. A psychological measure of Islamic religiousness: Development and evidence for reliability and validity. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 18 (4):291–315. doi:10.1080/10508610802229270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymo, J. M., H. Park., Y. Xie., and W. J. J. Yeung. 2015. Marriage and family in East Asia: Continuity and change. Annual Review of Sociology 41:471–92. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossen, L. M., M. J. K. Osterman., B. E. Hamilton., and J. A. Martin. 2017. Quarterly provisional estimates for selected birth indicators, 2015-Quarter 1. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System, Vital Statistics Rapid Release Program.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., H. Moosbrugger, and H. Müller. 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 8 (2):23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sujatha, D. S., and G. Brahmananda Reddy. 2009. Women’s education, autonomy, and fertility behaviour. Asia-Pacific Journal of Social Sciences 1 (1):35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, L. E., T. Hales, G. E. Ely, S. L. Auerbach, and K. Agbemenu. 2021. Validation of the short-form reproductive coercion scale with Appalachian women. Contraception 104 (3):265–70. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., and L. Fidell. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. New york: Allyn&Bacon/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tavşancıl, E. 2014. Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. 5th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, P. D. 2004. Biological clock ticks for men, too. Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (14):1683–5. doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuğrul, Y. G. 2019. A field study on women’s experiences of motherhood in the context of gender. Journal of Social and Cultural Studies 3:71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). 2022. World Population day report. 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dunya-Nufus-Gunu-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, W. J. J., C. Alipio, and F. Furstenberg. 2013. Transitioning to adulthood in Asia: Courtship, marriage, and work, an introduction. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 646 (1):6–27. doi:10.1177/0002716212470794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, A. 2004. Türk Kültüründe Kadın. Millî Folklor 16 (61):112–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, K. 2012. Investıgatıon into controversial issues and taboo topics: Social studies teachers’ perspectıves. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 (18):201–25.
   Google Scholar