The Science Framework for Implementing the Fisheries Protection Provisions of Canada's Fisheries Act

REFERENCES

• Allan, J. D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 257–284.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, M. J., R. G. Randall, K. S. Smokorowski, B. Keatley, and K. D. Clarke. 2014. A framework for assessing fisheries productivity for the Fisheries Protection Program. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2013/067, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, E. S., and I. M. Côté. 2008. Quantifying evidence for ecological synergies. Ecological Letters 11: 1278–1286.
   Google Scholar
• DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada). 1986. Policy for the management of fish habitat. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Communications Directorate, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada). 2013. DFO Fisheries Protection Policy Statement. Available: www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/pnw-ppe/pol/index-eng.html. (December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada). 2014a. Science advice for managing risk and uncertainty in operational decisions of the Fisheries Protection Program. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Advisory Report 2014/015, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada). 2014b. Science advice on offsetting techniques for managing the productivity of freshwater fisheries. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Advisory Report 2013/074, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Favaro, B., J. D. Reynolds, and I. M. Côté. 2012. Canada's weakening aquatic protection. Science 337: 154–154.
   Google Scholar
• Favaro, B., J. D. Reynolds, and I. M. Côté. nd. The Pathways of Effects framework. Available, www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/pnw-ppe/pathways-sequences/index-eng.html (December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada 2015 Fisheries Act (2014). Available lawslois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/F-14.pdf (May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, J. A., and J. R. Post. 2013. Gutting Canada's Fisheries Act: no fishery, no fish habitat protection. Fisheries 38: 497–501.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. L., R. G. Randall, D. Hayes, W. Dunlop, J. Imhof, G. Lacroix, and N. J. R. Ward. 1996. Assessing the ecological effects of habitat change: moving beyond productive capacity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53 (1):446–457.
   Google Scholar
• Kenchington, E., D. E. Duplisea, J. M. R. Curtis, J. C. Rice, A. Bundy, M. Koen-Alonso, and S. E. Doka. 2013. Identification of species and habitats that support commercial, recreational or aboriginal fisheries in Canada. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2012/110, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, M. A., M. Koen-Alonso, K. E. Smokorowski, and J. C. Rice. 2013. A science-based interpretation and framework for considering the contribution of the relevant fish to the ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2012/141, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, M. A., R. G. Randall, K. D. Clarke, E. C. Enders, K. E. Smokorowski, S. E. Doka, D. A. Watkinson, and M. J. Bradford. In Press. A review of scientific evidence supporting generic productivity-state response curves. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2014, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe, N. W. R., S. J. Cooke, J. G. Imhof, D. Boisclair, J. M. Casselman, R. A. Curry, O. E. Langer, R. L. McLaughlin, C. K. Minns, J. R. Post, M. Power, J. B. Rasmussen, J. D. Reynolds, J. S. Richardson, and W. M. Tonn. 2014. Principles for ensuring healthy and productive freshwater ecosystems that support sustainable fisheries. Environmental Reviews 22: 110–134.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, K. G., and K. D. Clarke. 2014. A review of methods used to offset residual impacts of development projects on fisheries productivity. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2013/097, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Minns, C. K., R. G. Randall, K. E. Smokorowski, K. D. Clarke, A. Vélez-Espino, R. S. Gregory, S. Courtenay, and P. LeBlanc. 2011. Direct and indirect estimates of the productive capacity of fish habitat under Canada's Policy for the Management of Fish Habitat: where have we been, where are we now, and where are we going? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 68: 2204–2227.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, R. H., and M. C. Thoms. 1999. What is river health? Freshwater Biology 41: 197–209.
   Google Scholar
• Quetier, F., and S. Lavorel. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions Biological Conservation 144: 2991–2999.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, R. G., M. J. Bradford, K. D. Clarke, and J. C. Rice. 2013. A science-based interpretation of ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, Research Document 2012/112, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar