1,125
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FEATURE

Muskellunge and Northern Pike Ecology and Management: Important Issues and Research Needs

, , , , , & show all

REFERENCES

  • Axon, J. R., and L. E. Kornman. 1986. Characteristics of native Muskellunge streams in eastern Kentucky. Pages 263–272 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Battige, K. 2011. Great Lakes spotted Muskellunge restoration: evaluating natural recruitment and modeling spawning habitat in Green Bay, Lake Michigan. Master's thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Bosworth, A., and J. M. Farrell. 2006. Genetic divergence among Northern Pike from spawning locations in the upper St. Lawrence River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26: 676–684.
  • Bry, C. 1996. Role of vegetation in the life cycle of pike. Pages 45–67 in J. F. Craig, editor. Pike: biology and exploitation. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Casselman, J. M. 1975. Sex ratios of Northern Pike, Esox lucius Linnaeus. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 104: 60–63.
  • Casselman, J. M. 1978. Effects of environmental factors on growth, survival, activity and exploitation of Northern Pike. Pages 114–128 in R. L. Kendall, editor. Selected coolwater fishes of North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 11, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Casselman, J. M. 1996. Age, growth and environmental requirements of Pike, Esox lucius. Pages 69–101 in J. F. Craig, editor. Pike: biology and exploitation. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Casselman, J. M. 2002. Effects of temperature, global extremes, and climate change on year-class production of warmwater, coolwater, and coldwater fishes in the Great Lakes Basin. Pages 39–59 in N. A. McGinn, editor. Fisheries in a changing climate. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 32, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Casselman, J. M. 2011. Changes in growth rate of Muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) in the upper St. Lawrence River: viral hemorrhagic septicemia and growth-rate selective mortality. Manuscript Report, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.
  • Casselman, J. M., E. J. Crossman, and C. J. Robinson. 1996. Assessing sustainability of trophy Muskellunge fisheries. Pages 29–39 in S. J. Kerr and C. H. Olver, editors. Managing muskies in the ’90s Workshop Proceedings. Southern Region Science and Technology Transfer Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, Ontario.
  • Casselman, J. M., and H. H. Harvey. 1975. Selective fish mortality resulting from low winter oxygen. International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology Proceedings 19: 2418–2429.
  • Casselman, J. M., and C. A. Lewis. 1996. Habitat requirements of Northern Pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53 (Suppl. 1):161–1741.
  • Clark, C. F. 1950. Observations on the spawning habits of Northern Pike, Esox lucius, in northwestern Ohio. Copeia 4: 285–288.
  • Cooper, J. E., J. V. Mead, J. M. Farrell, and R. G. Werner. 2008. Potential effects of spawning habitat changes on the segregation of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) and Muskellunge (E. masquinongy) in the Upper St. Lawrence River. Hydrobiologia 601: 41–53.
  • Craig, R. E., and R. M. Black. 1986. Nursery habitat of Muskellunge in southern Georgian Bay, Lake Huron, Canada. Pages 79–86 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Crane, D. P., J. M. Farrell, and K. L. Kapuscinski. 2014. Identifying important micro-habitat characteristics of Muskellunge spawning locations in the upper Niagara River. Journal of Great Lakes Research 40: 325–335.
  • Crossman, E. J. 1986. The noble Muskellunge: a review. Pages 1–13 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Diana, J. S., W. C. Mackay, and M. Ehrman. 1977. Movements and habitat preference of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) in Lac Ste. Anne, Alberta. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106: 560–565.
  • Dombeck, M. P. 1986. Muskellunge habitat, with guidelines for habitat management. Pages 208–215 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Dombeck, M. P., B. W. Menzel, and P. N. Hinz. 1984. Muskellunge spawning habitat and reproductive success. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113: 205–216.
  • Farrell, J. M. 2001. Reproductive success of sympatric Northern Pike and Muskellunge in an upper St. Lawrence River bay. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130: 796–808.
  • Farrell, J. M., J. V. Mead, and B. A. Murry. 2006. Protracted spawning of St. Lawrence River Northern Pike (Esox lucius): simulated effects on survival, growth, and production. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 15: 169–179.
  • Farrell, J. M., R. G. Werner, S. R. LaPan, and K. A. Claypoole. 1996. Egg distribution and spawning habitat of Northern Pike and Muskellunge in a St. Lawrence River marsh, New York. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125: 127–131.
  • Forney, J. L. 1968. Production of northern pike in a regulated marsh. New York Fish and Game Journal 15: 143–154.
  • Franklin, D. R., and L. L. Smith. 1963. Early life history of the Northern Pike, Esox lucius L., with special reference to strength of year classes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 92: 91–110.
  • Funk, W. C, J. K. McKay, P. A. Hohenlohe, and F. W. Allendorf. 2012. Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 489–496.
  • Grimm, M. P. 1989. Northern Pike (Esox lucius L.) and aquatic vegetation tools in management of fisheries and water quality in shallow waters. Hydrobiological Bulletin 23: 59–65.
  • Haas, R. C. 1978. The Muskellunge in Lake St. Clair. Pages 334–359 in R. L. Kendall, editor. A symposium on selected coolwater fishes of North America. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 11, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Hanson, D. A., J. R. Axon, J. M. Casselman, R. C. Haas, A. Schiavone, and M. R. Smith. 1986. Improving musky management: a review of management and research needs. Pages 335–341 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Jennings, M. J., B. L. Sloss, G. R. Hatzenbeler, J. M. Kampa, T. D. Simonson, S. P. Avelallemant, G. A. Lindenberger, and B. D. Underwood. 2010. Implementation of genetic conservation practices in a Muskellunge propagation and stocking program. Fisheries 35: 388–395.
  • Kapuscinski, K. L., B. J. Belonger, S. Fajfer, and T. J. Lychwick. 2007. Population dynamics of Muskellunge in Wisconsin waters of Green Bay, Lake Michigan, 1989–2005. Environmental Biology of Fishes 79 (1–2):27–36.
  • Kapuscinski, K. L., and J. M. Farrell. 2014. Habitat factors influencing fish assemblages at Muskellunge nursery sites. Journal of Great Lakes Research 40 (Suppl. 2):135–147.
  • Kapuscinski, K. L., B. L. Sloss, and J. M. Farrell. 2013. Genetic population structure of Muskellunge in the Great Lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 1075–1089.
  • Kobler, A., T. Klefoth, T. Mehner, and R. Arlinghaus. 2009. Coexistence of behavioural types in an aquatic top predator: a response to resource limitation? Oecologia 161: 837–847.
  • Koppelman, J. B., and D. P. Philipp. 1986. Genetic applications in Muskellunge management. Pages 111–121 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • LaPan, S. R., A. Schiavone, and R. G. Werner. 1996. Spawning and post-spawning movements of the St. Lawrence River Muskellunge (Esox masquinongy). Pages 73–82 in S. J. Kerr and C. H. Olver, editors. Managing muskies in the 90's Workshop Proceedings. Southern Region Science and Technology Transfer Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Kemptville, Ontario.
  • Larsen, P. F., M. M. Hansen, E. E. Nielsen, L. F. Jensen, and V. Loeschcke. 2005. Stocking impact and temporal stability of genetic composition in a brackish Northern Pike population (Esox lucius L.), assessed using microsatellite DNA analysis of historical and contemporary samples. Heredity 95: 136–143.
  • Launey, S., J. Morin, S. Minery, and J. LaRoche. 2006. Microsatellite genetic variation reveals extensive introgression between wild and introduced stocks, and a new evolutionary unit in French Pike Esox lucius L. Journal of Fish Biology 68 (Suppl. B):193–216.
  • Lysack, W. 2004. Pike and Walleye in the Rocky Lake–Root–Reader Marsh complex. Manitoba Water Stewardship, MS Report No. 04-01, Winnipeg, MT, Canada.
  • Matsumura, S., R. Arlinghaus, and U. Dieckmann. 2011. Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to Northern Pike (Esox lucius). Evolutionary Ecology 25: 711–735.
  • Miller, L. M., S. W. Mero, and J. A. Younk. 2009. The genetic legacy of stocking Muskellunge in a northern Minnesota lake. Transaction of the American Fisheries Society 138: 602–615.
  • Miller, L. M., S. W. Mero, and J. A. Younk 2012. The impact of stocking on the current ancestry in 20 native and introduced Muskellunge populations in Minnesota. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141: 1411–1423.
  • Miller, L. M., and W. Senanan. 2003. A review of Northern Pike population genetics research and its implications for management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23: 297–306.
  • Mingelbier, M., P. Brodeur, and J. Morin. 2008. Spatially explicit model predicting the spawning habitat and early stage mortality of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) in a large system: the St. Lawrence River between 1960 and 2000. Hydrobiologia 601: 55–69.
  • Murry, B. A., and J. M. Farrell. 2007. Quantification of native Muskellunge nursery habitat: influence of body size, fish community composition, and vegetation structure. Environmental Biology of Fishes 79: 37–47.
  • Nohner, J. K., and J. S. Diana. 2015. Muskellunge spawning site selection in northern Wisconsin lakes and a GIS-based predictive habitat model. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 35: 141–157.
  • Pierce, R. B., J. A. Younk, and C. M. Tomcko. 2007. Expulsion of miniature radio transmitters along with eggs of Muskellunge and Northern Pike—a new method for locating critical spawning habitat. Environmental Biology of Fishes 79: 99–109.
  • Poff, L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. Richter, R. Sparks, and J. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47: 769–784.
  • Rust, A. J., J. S. Diana, T. L. Margenau, and C. J. Edwards. 2002. Lake characteristics influencing spawning success of Muskellunge in Northern Wisconsin lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 834–841.
  • Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184, Ottawa.
  • Senanan, W., and A. R. Kapuscinski. 2000. Genetic relationship among populations of Northern Pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 391–404.
  • Strand, R. F. 1986. Identification of principal spawning areas, seasonal distribution and movements of Muskellunge in Leech Lake Minnesota. Pages 62–73 in G. E. Hall, editor. Managing muskies. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Principles for the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Resources. EPA841-F-00-003. Office of Water (4501F), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available: www.water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/restore/principles.cfm#list (February 2014).
  • Zorn, S. A., T. L. Margenau, J. S. Diana, and C. J. Edwards. 1998. The influence of spawning habitat on natural reproduction of Muskellunge in Wisconsin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127: 995–1005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.