Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education classrooms

References

• Albright , R. C. and Post , P. E. 1993 . The challenge of electronic learning . Training , 47 : 27 – 29 .
   Google Scholar
• Andersen , J. F. 1979 . “ Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness ” . In Communication Yearbook , Edited by: Nimmo , D. Vol. 3 , 543 – 559 . New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction Books .
   Google Scholar
• Andersen , P. and Andersen , J. 1982 . “ Nonverbal immediacy in instruction ” . In Communication in the classroom , Edited by: Barker , L. 98 – 120 . Englewood cliffs, NJ : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Bloom , B. S. 1956 . Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive Domain , New York : David McKay Company .
   Google Scholar
• Christophel , D. M. 1990 . The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning . Communication Education , 39 : 323 – 340 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen , L. J. and Menzel , K. E. 1998 . The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective and behavioral learning . Communication Education , 47 : 82 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. 1998 . Statistical power analysis for the social sciences , Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence E. Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Connick , G. P. 1997 . Issues and trends to take us into the twenty‐first century . New Directions for Teaching & Learning , 71 : 7 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Comstock , J. , Rowell , E. and Waite Bowers , J. 1995 . Food for thought”;. Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity . Communication Education , 44 : 251 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper , P. J. 1995 . Communication for the classroom teacher , Scottsdale, AZ : Gorsuch Scarisback Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Cyrs , T. E. 1997 . Competence in teaching at a distance . New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 71 : 15 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Egan , M. W. and Gibb , G. S. 1997 . Student‐centered instruction for the design of telecourses . New Directions for Teaching & Learning , 71 : 33 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Gill , P. and Myers , C. 1989 . Classroom of the year 2001 ERIC document ED325066
   Google Scholar
• Gorham , J. 1988 . The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning . Communication Education , 37 : 40 – 53 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham , J. and Zakahi , W. R. 1990 . A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product . Communication Education , 39 : 354 – 368 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorc , A. F. 1985 . The Gregorc style delineator , Columbia, CT : Gregorc Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero , L. K. and Miller , T. A. 1998 . Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses . Communication Education , 47 : 30 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes , K. J. and Dillion , C. 1992 . Distance education: Learning outcomes, interaction, and attitudes . Journal of Education for Library and Information Science , 33 (1) : 35 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howles , L. Instructional technology in the classroom . Workshop presented at the Undergraduate Teaching Improvement Council Board Meeting . Madison, WI. September .
   Google Scholar
• Imel , S. 1996 . “ ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education ” . In Distance education: Trends and issue alerts Columbus, Ohio
   Google Scholar
• Jones , J. 1992 . Distance education: A cost analysis , Des Moines, IA : Iowa State Department of Education .
   Google Scholar
• Kearney , P. 1994 . “ Generalized immediacy scale ” . In Communication research measures: A sourcebook , Edited by: Rubin , R. B. , Palmgreen , P. and Sypher , H. E. 169 – 172 . New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lemke , R. A. Advancing distance education programs with ordinary technologies . Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association Educational Communications and Technology .
   Google Scholar
• McHenry , L. and Bozik , M. Communicating at a Distance: A Study of Interaction in a Distance Education Classroom . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Communication Association . Indianapolis, IN. April .
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin , M. and Ericson , K. 1981 . Multidimensional analysis of the “ideal interpersonal communication instructor . Communication Education , 30 : 397 – 398 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel , K. E. and Carrell , L. J. 1999 . The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and student learning . Communication Education , 48 : 31 – 40 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen , A. 1987 . Three decades of sexism in school science materials . School Library Journal , : 117 – 122 .
   Google Scholar
• Norton , R. 1983 . Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Sanders , J. A. and Wiseman , R. L. 1990 . The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom . Communication Education , 39 : 341 – 353 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson , M. R. 1997 . Evaluating teaching and learning at a distance . New Directions for Teaching and Learning , 71 : 87 – 91 .
   Google Scholar
• Yeaman , A. 1994 . Analysis of computers in education as a cultural field . Educational Media and Technology Yearbook , 20 : 70 – 74 .
   Google Scholar