1,107
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Invited Article

Perspectives on Instructional Communication's Historical Path to the Future

References

  • Adams, M. (1997). Pedagogical frameworks for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. E. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook (pp. 30–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Allen, J. L., Long, K. M., O’Mara, J., & Judd, B. B. (2008). Students' predispositions and orientations toward communication and perceptions of instructor reciprocity and learning. Communication Education, 57, 20–40. doi:10.1080/03634570701670908
  • Allen, M., Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55, 21–31. doi:10.1080/03634520500343368
  • Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543–559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 380–389.
  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2000). Teaching to promote holistic learning and development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 82, 88–98. doi:10.1002/tl.8209
  • Beebe, S. E. (1980, November). The role of nonverbal communication in education: Research and theoretical perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov
  • Bell, R. A., & Daly, J. A. (1984). The affinity-seeking function of communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 91–115. doi:10.1080/03637758409390188
  • Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Bertelsen, D. A., & Goodboy, A. K. (2009). Curriculum planning: Trends in communication studies, workplace competencies, and current programs at 4-year colleges and universities. Communication Education, 58, 262–275. doi:10.1080/03634520902755458
  • Boostrom, R. B. (1998). “Safe spaces”: Reflections on an educational metaphor. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30, 397–408. doi:10.1080/002202798183549
  • Boudet, J. M. F., & Talon, J. L. H. (2012). Use of a wiki as a postgraduate education tool: A case study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 1334–1340.
  • Bouris, J., & Allen, M. (1992). Meta-analysis of the relationship between communication apprehension and cognitive performance. Communication Education, 41, 68–76. doi:10.1080/03634529209378871
  • Bryant, J., Comiskey, P. W., Crane, J. S., & Zillman, D. (1980). Relationship between college teachers' use of humor in the classroom and students' evaluations of their instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 511–519. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.511
  • Burroughs, N. F. (2007). A reinvestigation of the relationship of teacher nonverbal immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning. Communication Education, 56, 453–475. doi:10.1080/03634520701530896
  • Burroughs, N. F., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college classroom. Communication Education, 38, 214–229. doi:10.1080/03634528909378758
  • de Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In J. Elrn & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments (pp. 107–128). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
  • Downs, V. C., Javidi, M., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1988). An analysis of teachers' verbal communication within the college classroom, use of humor, self-disclosure, and narratives. Communication Education, 37, 127–141. doi:10.1080/03634528809378710
  • Dwyer, K. K. (1998). Communication apprehension and learning style preference: Correlations and implications for teaching. Communication Education, 47, 137–150. doi:10.1080/03634529809379118
  • Eadie, W. F. (2011). Stories we tell: Fragmentation and convergence in communication disciplinary history. The Review of Communication, 11, 161–176. doi:10.1080/15358593.2011578257
  • Finn, A. N., Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Elledge, N., Jernberg, K., & Larson, L. M. (2009). A meta-analytical review of teacher credibility and its association with teacher behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 516–537. doi:10.1080/03364520903131154
  • Fisher, B. A. (1978). Perspectives on human communication. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Flatley, M. E. (2005). Blogging for enhanced teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, 77–80. doi:10.1177/108056990506800111
  • Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. L. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
  • Gayle, B. M., Cortez, D., & Preiss, R. W. (2013). Safe spaces, difficult dialogues, and critical thinking. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7, Article 5. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol7/iss2/5
  • Goodboy, A. K. (2011a). The development and validation of the Instructional Dissent Scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–440. doi:10.1080/036345232011.569894
  • Goodboy, A. K. (2011b). Instructional dissent in the college classroom. Communication Education, 60, 296–313. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.537756
  • Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2011). Student motives for communicating with instructors as a function of perceived instructor power use. Communication Research Reports, 28, 109–114. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.541368
  • Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the Student Communication Satisfaction Scale. Communication Education, 58, 372–396. doi:10.1080/03634520902755441
  • Hackford-Peer, K. (2010). In the name of safety: Discursive positionings of queer youth. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 541–546. doi:10.1007/s11217-010-9197-4
  • Henry, A. (1994). There are no safe places: Pedagogy as powerful and dangerous terrain. Action in Teacher Education, 15, 1–4. doi:10.1080/01626620.1994.10463171
  • Holaday, D. A. (1995). New media and communication education: Two histories, one future. Media Asia, 22, 183–188.
  • Holley, L. C., & Steiner, S. (2005). Safe space: Student perspectives on classroom environment. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 49–64. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2005.200300343
  • Houser, M. L., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). The role of student characteristics and teacher behaviors in students' learner empowerment. Communication Education, 58, 35–53. doi:10.1080/03634520802237383
  • Jehangir, R. R. (2012). Conflict as a catalyst for learning. About Campus, 17, 2–8. doi:10.1002/abc.21073
  • Kahl, M. L., & Lederman, L. C. (2009) Reflections on the Eastern Communication Association centennial convention: The association at 100. Communication Quarterly, 57, 376–378. doi:10.1080/01463370903320948
  • Kearney, P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1981). Relationships among teacher communication style, trait and state communication apprehension and teacher effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 533–551). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hayes, E. R., & Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teachers' misbehaviors: What students don’t like about what teachers say and do. Communication Quarterly, 39, 309–324. doi:10.1080/01463379109369808
  • Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34, 19–28. doi:10.1080/03634528509378579
  • Kelsey, D. M., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Allen, T. H., & Ritter, K. J. (2004). College students' attributions of teacher misbehaviors. Communication Education, 53, 40–55. doi:10.10/0363452032000135760
  • Kendrick, W. L., & Darling, A. L. (1990). Problems of understanding in classrooms: Students' use of clarifying tactics. Communication Education, 39, 15–29. doi:10.1080/03634529009378784
  • Kibler, R. J., & Barker, L. L. (Eds.). (1969). Conceptual frontiers in speech-communication: Report of the New Orleans conference on research and instructional development. New York, NY: Speech Association of America.
  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet & Higher Education, 8, 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
  • King, G., & Sen, M. (2013). The troubled future of colleges and universities. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46, 83–89. doi:10.107/S1010490965120011606
  • Lannutti, P. J., & Strauman, E. C. (2006). Classroom communication: The influence of instructor self-disclosure on student evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 54, 89–99. doi:10.1080/10463370500270496
  • Lashbrook, V. J., & Wheeless, L. R. (1978). Instructional communication theory and research: An overview of the relationship between learning theory and instructional communication. In B. D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 439–456). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Lieb-Brilhart, B. (1976). Communication education in the USA: Past, present, and future. Communication, 4, 16–36.
  • Lin, M-F. G., Hoffman, E. S., & Borengasser, C. (2013). Is social media too social for class? A case study of Twitter use. TechTrends, 57, 39–45. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0644-2
  • Littlejohn, S. W., & Domenici, K. (2001). Engaging communication in conflict: Systematic practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3, 101–114.
  • Luppicini, R. (2005). A systems definition of educational technology in society. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 103–109.
  • Mayo, C. (2002). The binds that tie: Civility and social differences. Educational Theory, 52, 169–186. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00169.x
  • Mayo, C. (2010). Incongruity and provisional safety: Thinking through humor. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 52, 509–521. doi:10.1007/s11217-010-9195-6
  • McCorkle, D. E., & McCorkle, Y. L. (2012). Using LinkedIn in the marketing classroom: Exploratory insights and recommendations for teaching social media/networking. Marketing Education Review, 22, 157–166. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008220205
  • McCroskey, J. C. (1977). The classroom consequences of communication apprehension. Communication Education, 26, 27–33. doi:10.1080/03634527709378196
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Andersen, J. (1976). The relationship between communication apprehension and academic achievement among college students. Human Communication Research, 3, 73–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00506.x
  • McCroskey, J. C., Andersen, J., Richmond, V. P., & Wheeless, L. R. (1981). Communication apprehension of elementary and secondary students and teachers. Communication Education, 30, 122–133. doi:10.1080/03634528109378461
  • McCroskey, J. C., Booth-Butterfield, S., & Payne, S. K. (1989). The impact of communication apprehension on college student retention and success. Communication Quarterly, 37, 100–107. doi:10.1080/01463378909385531
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1986). The affinity-seeking of classroom teachers. Communication Research Reports, 3, 158–167.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Instructional communication: The historical perspective. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 33–47). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McVetta, R. W. (1978). Instructional communication theory versus student preferences. Communication Education, 27, 99–111. doi:10.1080/03634527809378281
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175–184. doi:10.1080/03634528309378527
  • McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). The role of communication in instruction: The first three decades. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen, M. (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 15–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McCroskey, L. L., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2002). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Contributions from the discipline of communication. Communication Education, 51, 383–391. doi:10.1080/03634520216521
  • McEwen, J. S., & Reed, W. R. (1999, November). The relationship of informational receptivity to trait interaction involvement and other factors. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Montero, J. (1995). Safe space or separation? Mediating the tension. Educational Record, 76, 37–40.
  • Morreale, S. P., & Backlund, P. M. (2002). Communication curricula: History, recommendations, resources. Communication Education, 51, 2–18. doi:10.1080/03634520216498
  • Myers, S. A. (2010). Instructional communication: The emergence of a field. In D. L. Fassett & T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 149–159). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Myers, S. A., Edwards, C., Wahl, S. T., & Martin, M. M. (2007). The relationship between perceived instructor aggressive communication and college student involvement. Communication Education, 56, 495–508. doi:10.1080/03634520701461398
  • Nerone, J. (2006). The future of communication history. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23, 254–262. doi:10.1080/07393180600801856
  • Norton, R. W. (1977). Teacher effectiveness as a function of communicator style. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1 (pp. 525–542). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Nussbaum, J. F., & Scott, M. E. (1980). Student learning as a result of teacher student interaction. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 533–552). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Ortiz, A. M. (2000). Expressing cultural identity in the learning community: Opportunities and challenges. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 82, 67–79. doi:10.1002/tl.8207
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation, learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  • Preiss, R. W., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (1990). Potential cognitive processes and consequences of receiver apprehension: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 155–172.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
  • Reid, L. (1990). Speech teacher: A random narrative. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
  • Roach, K. D. (1998). Teaching assistant communication apprehension, willingness to communicate and state communication anxiety in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15, 130–140. doi:10.1080/08824099809362107
  • Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59, 185–213. doi:10.1080/03634520903505936
  • Ross, R. S. (1965). Speech communication: Fundamentals and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Rubin, R. B., & Feezel, J. D. (1985). Teacher communication competence: Essential skills and assessment. Central States Speech Journal, 36, 4–13. doi:10.1080/10510978509363194
  • Rubin, R. B., & Feezel, J. D. (1986). Elements of teacher communication competence. Communication Education, 35, 254–268. doi:10.1080/03634528609388348
  • Schrodt, P., Turman, P. D., & Soliz, J. (2006). Perceived understanding as a mediator of perceived teacher confirmation and students' rating of instruction. Communication Education, 55, 370–380. doi:10.1080/03634520600879196
  • Schrodt, P., Wheeless, L. R., & Ptacek, K. M. (2000). Informational reception apprehension, educational motivation, and achievement. Communication Quarterly, 48, 60–73. doi:10.1080/01463370009385580
  • Schrodt, P., & Witt, P. L. (2006). Students' attributions of instructor credibility as a function of students' expectations of instructional technology use and nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 55, 1–20. doi:10.1080/03634520500343335
  • Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Turman, P. D., Myers, S. A., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2009). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructors' prosocial communication behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 350–371. doi:10.1080/03634520902926851
  • Schwartzman, R. (2006), Virtual group problem solving in the basic communication course: Lessons for online learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 3–14.
  • Scott, M. D., & Wheeless, L. R. (1975). Communication apprehension, student attitudes, and levels of satisfaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 41, 188–198. doi:10.1080/10570317709389611
  • Scott, M. D., & Wheeless, L. R. (1977). Instructional communication theory and research: An overview. In B. D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1 (pp. 495–511). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Sherblom, J. C. (2010). The computer-mediated communication (CMC) classroom: A challenge of medium, presence, interaction, identity, and relationship. Communication Education, 59, 497–523. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.486440
  • Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Education, 59, 165–184. doi:10.1080/03634520903398867
  • Sorensen, G. (1989). The relationships among teachers' self-disclosive statements, students' perceptions, and affective learning. Communication Education, 38, 259–277. doi:10.1080/03634528909378762
  • Soukup, P. A. (2011). Communication technology and education. Communication Research Trends, 30, 3–36,
  • Sprague, J. (2002). Communication education: The spiral continues. Communication Education, 51, 337–354. doi:10.1080/03634520216532
  • Sproule, J. M. (2008). “Communication”: From concept to field to discipline. In D. W. Park & J. Pooly (Eds.), The history of media and communication research: Contested memories (pp. 163–178). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Stengel, B. S., & Weems, L. (2010). Questioning safe place: An introduction. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 29, 505–507. doi:10.007/s11217-010-9205-8
  • Turman, P. D., & Schrodt, P. (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265–279. doi:10.1080/03634520600702570
  • Wanzer, M. B. (1998). An exploratory investigation of student and teacher perceptions of student-generated affinity-seeking strategies. Communication Education, 47, 373–382. doi:10.1080/03634529809379144
  • Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1–18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238
  • Wheeless, L. R. (1975). An investigation of receiver apprehension and social context dimensions of communication apprehension. The Speech Teacher, 24, 261–268. doi:10.1080/03634527509378169
  • Wheeless, L. R., & Hurt, H. T. (1979). Instructional communication theory and research: An overview of instructional strategies as instructional communication systems. In D. Nimo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 525–541). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Wheeless, L. R., Preiss, R. W., & Gayle, B. M. (1997). Receiver apprehension, informational receptivity, and cognitive processing. In J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Ayers (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (2nd ed., pp. 151–187). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Wheeless, L. R., & Schrodt, P. (2001). An examination of cognitive foundations of informational reception apprehension: Political identification, religious affiliation, and family environment. Communication Research Reports, 18, 1–10. doi:10.1080/08824090109384777
  • Woolbert, C. H. (1923). The teaching of speech as an academic discipline. Quarterly Journal of Speech Education, 9, 1–18. doi:10.1080/00335632309379407

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.