Revisiting Instructor Misbehaviors: A Revised Typology and Development of a Measure

References

• Anderson, L. E., & Carta-Falsa, J. (2010). Factors that make faculty and student relationships effective. College Teaching, 50, 134–138. doi:10.1080/87567550209595894
   Google Scholar
• Banfield, S. R., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2006). The effect of teacher misbehaviors on teacher credibility and affect for the teacher. Communication Education, 55, 63–72. doi:10.1080/03634520500343400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C. H., Jr. (2012). Student values and research: Are Millenials really changing the future of reference and research. Journal of Library Administration, 52, 474–497. doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.707948
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., & Holbert, L. (2008). Empirical intersections in communication research: Replication, multiple quantitative methods, and bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. Journal of Communication, 58, 615–628. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. (2011). Research on PowerPoint: From basic features to multimedia. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7, 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, W. L., & Rehling, D. L. (2010). Student perceptions of classroom incivility. College Teaching, 58, 15–18. doi:10.0180/8756755090325801
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. doi:10.1080/0363452900378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2013). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication: The influence of mixed reviews on student perceptions of instructors and courses. Communication Education, 62, 412–424. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.800217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2013). Teacher power mediates the effects of technology policies on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62, 26–47. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.725132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The Revised Learning Indicators Scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1080/105109799093884666
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011). The development and validation of the Instructional Dissent Scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–440. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2009). College teacher misbehaviors: Direct and indirect effects on student communication behavior and traditional learning outcomes. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 204–219. doi:10.1080/10570310902856089
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the Student Communication Satisfaction Scale. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Myers, S. A., & Bolkan, S. (2010). Student motives for communicating with instructors as a function of perceived instructor misbehaviors. Communication Research Reports, 27, 11–19. doi:10.1080/08824090903526604
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1992). Students’ perceptions of teacher behaviors as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly, 40, 239–252. doi:10.1080/01463379209369839
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J. L., & Bolkan, S. (2014). Instructor responses to rhetorical justice: Student perceptions of justice and classroom outcomes. Communication Education, 63, 17–40. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.833644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 344–356. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, L. R., & Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teacher misbehaviors: What students don't like about what teachers say or do. Communication Quarterly, 39, 309–324. doi:10.1080/01463379109369808
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., Becker, B., Cole, J., Littleford, L., & Rothe, B. (2012). “It's the American lifestyle!”: An investigation of text messaging by college students. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 13, 1–9. doi:10.1080/17459435.2012.719203
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey, D. M., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Allen, T. H., & Ritter, K. J. (2004). College students’ attributions of teacher misbehaviors. Communication Education, 53, 40–55. doi:10.10/0363452032000135760
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, J. P., Zinn, T. E., Finney, S. J., & Jurich, D. P. (2011). The development and evaluation of the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 105–129. doi:10.1177/0748175611400292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. W., & Pier, P. M. (1999). Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 16–33. doi:10.1080/10417949909373153
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis and scale validation in communication research. Communication Research Reports, 22, 335–338. doi:10.1080/00036810500317730
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., & Lee, H. B. (2014). American and South Korean engineering students’ communication motives and their student–instructor communication satisfaction. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 43, 30–44. doi:10.1080/1745759.2013.869244
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale & M. Brooks (Eds.), Assessing college student competency in communication (pp. 56–70). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5, 375–382. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00651.x
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2010). Instructional communication: The emergence of a field. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 149–159). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2012). Students’ perceptions of classroom group work as a function of group member selection. Communication Teacher, 26, 50–64. doi:10.0180/17404622.2011.625368
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Edwards, C., Wahl, S. T., & Martin, M. M. (2007). The relationship between perceived instructor aggressive communication and college student involvement. Communication Education, 56, 495–508. doi:10.1080/03634520701466398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Goodboy, A. K., & Members of COMM 600. (2014). College student learning, motivation, and satisfaction as a function of effective instructor communication behaviors. Southern Communication Journal, 79, 14–26. doi:10.1080/1041794x.2013.815255
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Shimotsu, S., Byrnes, K., Frisby, B. N., Durbin, J., & Loy, B. N. (2010). Assessing the role of peer relationships in the small group communication course. Communication Teacher, 24, 43–57. doi:10.1080/17404620903468214
   Google Scholar
• Niles, P. (2011). Meeting the needs of the 21st century student. Communication & Junior College Libraries, 17, 47–51. doi:10.1080/02763915.2011.591707
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41, 167–180. doi:10.1080/03634529209378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K. (2004). Grounded theory. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), The handbook of data analysis (pp. 625–648). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. doi:10.1080.03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S., Straub, C., Rodriguez, J., & VanHorn, B. (2011). Using clickers in large college psychology classes: Academic achievement and perceptions. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Semlak, J. L., & Pearson, J. C. (2008). Through the years: An examination of instructor age and misbehavior on perceived teacher credibility. Communication Research Reports, 25, 76–85. doi:10.1080/08824090701831867
   Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., & Turman, P. D. (2005). The impact of instructional technology use, course design, and sex differences on students’ initial perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Quarterly, 53, 177–196. doi:10.1080/01463370500090399
   Google Scholar
• Sidelinger, R. J., Bolen, D. M., Frisby, B. N., & McMullen, A. L. (2011). When instructors misbehave: An examination of student-to-student connectedness as a mediator in the college classroom. Communication Education, 60, 340–361. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.554991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, M-J., & Hess, J. A. (2005). Are student self-reports a valid method for measuring teacher nonverbal immediacy? Communication Education, 54, 170–179. doi:10.0180/03634520500213389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., & Gregory, J. B. (2012). Managing Millenials: A framework for improving attraction, motivation, and retention. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 15, 237–246. doi:10.1080/10887156.2012.730444
   Google Scholar
• Thweatt, K. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Teacher nonimmediacy and misbehavior: Unintentional negative communication. Communication Research Reports, 13, 198–204. doi:10.1080/08824099609362087
   Google Scholar
• Thweatt, K. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 47, 348–358. doi:10.1080/03634529809379141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M. (2009). Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: Teaching Generation Me. Medical Education, 43, 398–405. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03310.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, L. (2008). Increases in positive self-views among high school students: Birth-cohort changes in anticipated performance, self-satisfaction, self-liking, and self-competence. Psychological Science, 19, 1082–1086. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02204.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). Living in the age of entitlement: The narcissism epidemic. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Unal, Z., & Unal, A. (2011). Evaluating and comparing the usability of web-based course management systems. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Vallade, J. I., & Myers, S. A. (2014). Student forgiveness in the college classroom: Perceived instructor misbehaviors as relational transgressions. Communication Quarterly, 62, 342–356. doi:10.1080/01463373.2014.911767
   Google Scholar
• Varallo, S. M. (2008). Motherwork in academe: Intensive caring for the Millenial student. Women’s Studies in Communication, 31, 151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (2010). Philosophical and methodological foundations of instructional communication. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 161–179). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Teacher socio-communicative style as a correlate of student affect toward teacher and course material. Communication Education, 47, 43–52. doi:10.1080/03634529809379109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, F-Y. F., Wang, Y. K., & Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students’ self-regulation and sustained interaction: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61, 185–204. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.672755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. (2007). Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural investigation in China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Education, 56, 209–227. doi:10.1080/03634520601110104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., & Castelluccio, A. (2011). A cross-cultural investigation of student resistance in college classrooms: The effects of teacher misbehaviors and credibility. Communication Quarterly, 59, 450–464. doi:10.1080/01463373.2001.597287
   Google Scholar