Academic Advisee Motives for Pursuing Out-of-Class Communication with the Faculty Academic Advisor

References

• Addus, A. A., Chen, D., & Khan, A. S. (2007). Academic performance and advisement of university students: A case study. College Student Journal, 41, 316–326.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. M., & Smith, C. L. (2008). Importance of, responsibility for, and satisfaction with academic advising: A faculty perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 397–411. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylor, B., & Oppliger, P. (2003). Out of class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52, 122–134. doi:10.1080/03634520302469
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Babbie, E. (2004). The basics of communication research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Bippus, A. M., Brooks, C. F., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (2001). Students’ perceptions of part-time and tenured/tenure-track faculty: Accessibility, mentoring, and extra-class communication. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 30, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bippus, A. M., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Brooks, C. F. (2003). Teacher access and mentoring abilities: Predicting the outcome value of extra-class communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 260–275. doi:10.1080/00909880305379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaldi, E. D., Lombardi, J. V., & Yellen, V. (2006). Improving graduation rates: A simple method that works. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38(4), 44–50. doi:10.3200/CHNG.38.4.44-50
   Google Scholar
• Cayanus, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2004). An instructor self-disclosure scale. Communication Research Reports, 21, 252–263. doi:10.1080/08824090409359987
   Google Scholar
• Coll, K. M., & Stewart, R. A. (2008). College student retention: Instrument validation and value for partnering between academic and counseling services. College Student Journal, 42, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeVito, J. A. (1986). Teaching as relational development. In J. M. Civikly (Ed.), Communication in college classrooms (pp. 51–59). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation. Human Communication Research, 26, 264–291. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, D. L. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N., Shimkowski, J., O'Shaughnessy, C., & Heine, M. (2011). Verbally aggressive email messages: Examining the impact on student motivation and affect for the instructor and course. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 36, 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, P. R., & Boylan, H. R. (2010). Increasing student success and retention: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Developmental Education, 34, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher–student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusani, D. S. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student–faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232–255. doi:10.1080/00909889409365400
   Google Scholar
• Gallup, Inc. (2014). Gallup-purdue index inaugural national report. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/168791/gallup-purdue-index-inaugural-national-report.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, M. D., Graham, D. L., & Johnson, D. M. (2009). Are students more satisfied with academic advising when there is congruence between current and preferred advising styles? College Student Journal, 43, 313–324.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Trowbridge, M., & Felts, O. (2006, June). Engaging or not engaging in out-of-class communication: Students’ episodic perceptions, impressions of instructors, and locus of control. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Heisserer, D. L., & Parette, P. (2002). Advising at-risk students in college and university settings. College Student Journal, 36, 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (2002). Out of class communication between female and male students and faculty: The relationship to student perceptions of instructor immediacy. Women's Studies in Communication, 25(1), 119–137. doi:10.1080/07491409.2002.10162443
   Google Scholar
• Jankoski, J. (2010). Socialization and hate: Can higher education make a difference? Journal of Hate Studies, 9, 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M., Staton, A. Q., & Jorgensen-Earp, C. R. (1995). An ecological perspective on the transition of new university freshmen. Communication Education, 44, 336–352. doi:10.1080/03634529509379023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, W. J., & Powers, W. G. (2007). Development of a measure of student apprehension toward communicating with instructors. Human Communication, 10, 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Lightsey, C., & Martin, M. (2009, November). The predictive validity of the interpersonal attraction scale (IAS) in the instructional context. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• LaNasa, S. M., Olson, E., & Alleman, N. (2007). The impact of on-campus student growth on first-year student engagement and success. Research in Higher Education, 48, 941–966. doi:10.1007/s11162-007-9056-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Myers, S. A. (2000). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87, 830–834. doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (1999). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48, 155–164. doi:10.1080/03634529909379163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Valencic, K. M., & Heisel, A. D. (2001, April). The relationship between students’ motives for communicating with their instructors with their perceptions of their instructors’ nonverbal immediacy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Portland, ME.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, M., Vanderlinden, K., & Kim, E. (2010). A multi-level assessment of the impact of orientation programs on student learning. Research in Higher Education, 51, 320–345. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9159-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, R. C. (2005). Faculty-based advising: An important factor in community college retention. Community College Review, 32(4), 1–18. doi:10.1177/009155210503200402
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1992). An introduction to communication in the classroom. Edina, MN: Burgess International Group.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Instructional communication: The historical perspective. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Morita, N. (2009). Language, culture, gender, and academic socialization. Language and Education, 23, 443–460. doi:10.1080/09500780902752081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. (2006). The relationships between student responsive behaviors, student socio-communicative style, and instructors' subjective and objective assessments of student work. Communication Education, 55, 295–312. doi:10.1080/03634520600748581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Edwards, C., Wahl, S. T., & Martin, M. M. (2007). The relationship between perceived instructor aggressive communication and college student involvement. Communication Education, 56, 495–508. doi:10.1080/03634520701466398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Knapp, J. L. (2005). Perceived instructor in-class communicative behaviors as a predictor of student participation in out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 53, 437–450. doi:10.1080/01463370500102046
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (1995, November). The roles of empathy, credibility, and sex in out of class communication between faculty and students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out of class communication between faculty and students. Women's Studies in Communication, 24, 241–261. doi:10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436
   Google Scholar
• Nathini, V. P., & Rhymend Uthariaraj, V. V. (2012). Success prediction of students by integrating communication skills with achievement motivation and personality. International Journal on Computer Science & Engineering, 4, 1751–1760.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gara, L., Karp, M., & Hughes, K. L. (2009). An exploratory study of student perspectives. Community College Review, 36, 195–218. doi:10.1177/0091552108327186
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student–faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 545–595. doi:10.3102/00346543050004545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. Y. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlins, W. K. (2000). Teaching as a mode of friendship. Communication Theory, 10(1), 5–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shimotsu-Dariol, S., Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2012). Students' academic competitiveness and their involvement in the learning process. Communication Research Reports, 29, 310–319. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.723643
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. J. (2006). Academic advising of undergraduates in communication: Structural models and service challenges identified by faculty. Ohio Communication Journal, 44, 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & Hanson, T. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52(1), 39–53. doi:10.1080/01463370409370177
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/03634529709379069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truschel, J. (2008). Does the use of appreciative advising work? Learning Assistance Review, 13, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Turman, P., & Schrodt, P. (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265–279. doi:10.1080/03634520600702570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez, J. J., & Cano, J. (2012). Instructor verbal and nonverbal immediacy and the relationship with student self-efficacy and task value motivation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(2), 87–98. doi:10.5032/jae.2012.02087
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2007). The relationship between student educational orientation and motives for out of class communication. Communication Research Reports, 24, 249–256. doi:10.1080/08824090701446625
   Google Scholar