“It’s only one negative comment”: women instructors’ perceptions of (un)helpful support messages following hurtful course evaluations

References

• Acker, S., & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16, 3–24. doi: 10.1080/0954025032000170309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algozzine, B., Gretes, J., Flowers, C., Howley, L., Beattie, J., Spooner, F., … Bray, M. (2004). Student evaluation of college teaching: A practice in search of principles. College Teaching, 52, 134–141. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.52.4.134-141
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association, Committee on Women in Psychology. (2017). The changing gender composition of psychology: Update and expansion of the 1995 task force report. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/gender-composition/task-force-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 48, 193–210. doi: 10.1080/03634529909379169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P., & Copp, M. (1997). Gender matters most: The interaction of gender expectations, feminist course content, and pregnancy in student course evaluations. Teaching Sociology, 25, 29–43. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1319109 doi: 10.2307/1319109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambina, A. D. (2007). Online social support: The interplay of social networks and computer-mediated communication. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boren, J. P. (2013). Co-rumination partially mediates the relationship between social support and emotional exhaustion among graduate students. Communication Quarterly, 61, 253–267. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2012.751436
   Google Scholar
• Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Start, P. B. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. ScienceOpen Research [Electronic Source], 1–11. doi: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1
   Google Scholar
• Boyson, G. A. (2015). Uses and misuses of student evaluations of teaching: The interpretation of differences in teaching evaluation means irrespective of statistical information. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 109–118. doi: 10.1177/0098628315569922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123–151. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, J. (2017). Gendering metapragmatics in online discourse: “mansplaining man gonna mansplain … ”. Discourse, Context, & Media, 20, 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. (1982). The development of comforting skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578–1588. doi: 10.2307/1130086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. (1984). Comforting communication. In H. Sypher, & J. Applegate (Eds.), Communication by children and adults: Social cognitive and strategic processes (pp. 63–104). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1994). Comforting messages: Significance, approaches, and effects. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caffi, C. (1994). Metapragmatics. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 2461–2466). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., & Frayer, J. (2006). Acclimating to the professoriate: Perspectives from new female faculty members. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 4(2), 10–31.
   Google Scholar
• Carmack, H. J., & LeFebvre, L. E. (2019a). “Honestly didn’t learn shit”: A typology of negative course evaluations. Competitive paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association in Providence, Rhode Island.
   Google Scholar
• Carmack, H. J., & LeFebvre, L. E. (2019b). “Walking on eggshells”: Traversing the emotional and meaning making process surrounding hurtful course evaluations. Communication Education, 68, 350–370. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2019.1608366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71, 17–33. doi:10.1080/00221546.2000.11780814 doi: 10.2307/2649280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, D. D., & Joines, J. A. (2017). Strategies for increasing response rates for online end-of-course evaluations. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29, 47–60. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/
   Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Horan, S. M. (2018). Re)Negotiating power and influence in the classroom. In M. L. Houser, & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 112–125). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2017). “Your professor will know you as a person”: Evaluating and rethinking the relational boundaries between faculty and students. Journal of Management Education, 41, 9–38. doi: 10.1177/1052562916647986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004a). Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly, 52, 98–114. doi: 10.1080/01463370409370184
   Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004b). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53, 253–273. doi: 10.1080/0363452042000265189
   Google Scholar
• Clevenger, T., & Todd-Macillas, W. R. (1982). Student evaluations of communication courses. Communication Quarterly, 30, 48–55. doi: 10.1080/01463378209369428
   Google Scholar
• Crews, T. B., & Curtis, D. F. (2011). Online course evaluations: Faculty perspective and strategies for improved response rates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 865–878. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.493970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronen, V. E. (1976). Course evaluation in the graduate program. Communication Education, 25, 138–147. doi: 10.1080/03634527609384615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronen, V. E., & Fuller, R. (1976). Freshmen perceptions of instructor fairness and expertise: A problem in course evaluation. Communication Quarterly, 24, 45–47. doi: 10.1080/01463377609369209
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 413–428. doi: 10.1086/318638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174. doi: 10.1177/009365092019002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, E. E., LeFebvre, L., Brown, L. E., Tardif, S., & Love, B. (2014). Patterns of social support communicated in response to expressions of uncertainty in an online community of young adults with cancer. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 432–455. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.929725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, D. K. (2005). Diabetes management: An exploration into the verbal support attempts of relational others. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 6, 69–76. doi: 10.1080/17459430500262216
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, N. (2003). Support provider mood and familiar versus unfamiliar events: An investigation of social support quality. Communication Quarterly, 51, 209–224. doi: 10.1080/01463370309370151
   Google Scholar
• El-Alayli, A., Hansen-Brown, A. A., & Ceynar, M. (2018). Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles, 79, 136–150. doi: 10.1007/s11199-017-0872-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, C. R., Kramer, T. R., & Tian, R. G. (2003). Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 37–46. doi: 10.1108/09684880310462074
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H. (2002). Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education, 51, 225–236. doi: 10.1080/03634520216519
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, J. (2004). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Towards integrative models of the negative effects of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 487–508. doi: 10.1177/0265407504044844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2010). The influences of message and source factors on advice outcomes. Communication Research, 37, 553–575. doi: 10.1177/0093650210368258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. A., & Olson, K. A. (1997). Anger and hurt in response to provocation: Relationship to psychological adjustment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2014). Teacher verbal aggressiveness and credibility mediate the relationship between teacher technology policies and perceived student learning. Communication Education, 63, 210–234. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.919009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. (2015). Flawed evaluations. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Goodboy, A. K., & Buckner, M. M. (2015). Students’ instructional dissent and relationships with faculty members’ burnout, commitment, satisfaction, and efficacy. Communication Education, 64, 65–82. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.978794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Wanzer, M. B., & Wojtaszczyk, A. M. (2008). Assessing students’ perceptions of inappropriate and appropriate teacher humor. Communication Education, 57, 266–288. doi: 10.1080/03634520701687183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, K. (2018). In defense (sort of) student evaluations of teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com
   Google Scholar
• Gist-Mackey, A. N., Wiley, M. L., & Erba, J. (2018). “You’re doing great. Keep doing what you’re doing”: Socially supportive communication during first-generation college students’ socialization. Communication Education, 67, 52–72. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1390590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D., & Albrecht, T. (1993). The impact of supportive communication networks on test anxiety and performance. Communication Education, 42, 142–158. doi: 10.1080/03634529309378921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011). Instructional dissent in the college classroom. Communication Education, 60, 296–313. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.537756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2012). Instructional dissent as an expression of students’ verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness traits. Communication Education, 61, 448–458. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.699635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). An initial test of a cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Communication Research, 38, 326–355. doi: 10.1177/0093650210376191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husu, L. (2005). Women’s work-related and family-related discrimination and support in academia. In M. T. Segal & V. Demos (Eds.), Advances in gender research: Volume 9 - gender realities: Local and global (pp. 161–199). Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1987). Aggressiveness. In J. C. McCroskey, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 157–191). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1995). Teaching students to understand and control verbal aggression. Communication Education, 44, 51–63. doi: 10.1080/03634529509378997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Riddle, B. L., Horvath, C. L., & Tumlin, S. A. (1992). Verbal aggressiveness: Messages and reasons. Communication Quarterly, 40, 116–126. doi: 10.1080/01463379209369827
   Google Scholar
• Kersh, R. (2018). Women in higher education: Exploring stressful workplace factors and coping strategies. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 11, 56–73. doi: 10.1080/19407882.2017.1372295
   Google Scholar
• Kite, M. E., Subedi, P. C., & Bryant-Less, K. B. (2015). Students’ perceptions of the teaching evaluation process. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 307–314. doi: 10.1177/0098628315603062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koermer, C. D., & Petelle, J. L. (1991). Expectancy violation and student rating of instruction. Communication Quarterly, 39, 341–350. doi: 10.1080/01463379109369810
   Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Hausman, H. (2016). Do the best teachers get the best ratings? Frontiers in Psychology, 7 [electronic source]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozey, R. S., & Feeley, T. H. (2009). Comparing current and former student evaluations of course and instructor quality. Communication Research Reports, 26, 158–166. doi: 10.1080/08824090902861630
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25, 307–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampman, C. (2015). Gender differences in faculty responses to contrapower harassment. In K. De Welde, & A. Stepnick (Eds.), Disrupting the culture of silence: Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education (pp. 241–252). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lampman, C., Crew, E. C., Lowery, S. D., & Tompkins, K., & Mulder, M. (2016). Women faculty distressed: Descriptions and consequences of academic contrapower harassment. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 9, 169–189. doi: 10.1080/19407882.2016.1199385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lampman, C., Phelps, A., Bancroft, S., & Beneke, M. (2009). Contrapower harassment in academia: A survey of faculty experience with student incivility, bullying, and sexual attention. Sex Roles, 60, 331–346. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9560-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. W. (2018). Student evaluations of teaching are not valid. Academe. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/article/student-evaluations-teaching-are-not-valid#.XWqqmvZFxrR
   Google Scholar
• Linvill, D. L., & Mazer, J. P. (2013). The role of student aggressive communication traits in the perception of instructor ideological bias in the classroom. Communication Education, 62, 48–60. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.721889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucy, J. A. (1993). Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In J. A. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 9–32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Guntzviller, L. M., Hanasono, L. K., & Feng, B. (2016). Testing advice response theory in interactions with friends. Communication Research, 43, 211–231. doi: 10.1177/0093650213510938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Samter, W., & Gillihan, S. J. (2005). Academic stress, supportive communication, and health a version of this paper was presented at the 2005 international communication association convention in New York City. Communication Education, 54, 365–372. doi: 10.1080/03634520500442236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 291–303. doi: 10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Horvath, C. L. (1996). Feelings about verbal aggression: Justifications for sending and hurt from receiving verbally aggressive messages. Communication Research Reports, 13, 19–26. doi: 10.1080/08824099609362066
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Saenz, M., & Schnoover, S. (2014). Resisting the “student-as-consumer” metaphor. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do Babies Matter?: Gender and family in the ivory tower. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Stowe, S. A. (2016). Can teacher immediacy reduce the impact of verbal aggressiveness? Examining effects on student outcomes and perceptions of teacher credibility. Western Journal of Communication, 80, 21–37. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2014.943421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain, L., Gulbis, A., & Hays, D. (2018). Honesty on student evaluations of teaching: Effectiveness, purpose, and timing matters!. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1350828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. N., Katt, J. A., Brown, T., & Sivo, S. A. (2014). The relationship of instructor self-disclosure, nonverbal immediacy, and credibility to student incivility in the college classroom. Communication Education, 63, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2013.835054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A., & Pearson, J. (2013). Can I talk to you: The effects of instructor position, nationality, and teaching style on students’ perceived willingness to communicate and on teacher evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 61, 18–34. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2012.719059
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Chamberlin, M. (2000). Women are teachers, men are professors: A study of student perceptions. Teaching Sociology, 28, 283–298. doi: 10.2307/1318580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. M. W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51, 648–652. doi: 10.1017/S104909651800001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. S. (2019). The precarious new faculty majority: Communication and instruction research and contingent labor in higher education. Communication Education, 68, 235–245. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2019.1568512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (1998). Instructor socio-communicative style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15, 141–150. doi: 10.1080/08824099809362108
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2002). Perceived aggressive instructor communication and student state motivation, learning, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 15, 113–121. doi: 10.1080/08934210209367758
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Goldman, Z. W., Atkinson, J., Ball, H., Carton, S. T., Tindage, M. F., & Anderson, A. O. (2016). Student civility in the college classroom: Exploring student use and effects of classroom citizenship behavior. Communication Education, 65, 64–82. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1061197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Knox, R. L. (1999). Verbal aggression in the college classroom: Perceived instructor use and student affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47, 33–45. doi: 10.1080/01463379909370122
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A. (2000). The relationship between perceived instructor communicator style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Communication Research Reports, 17, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/08824090009388745
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics, IPEDS Data Center. (2016). Full-time instructional staff, by faculty and tenure status, academic rank, race/ethnicity, and gender (degree-granting institutions): Fall 2015. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, P. (2017). The sexism that permeates the academy. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Sexism-That-Permeates-the/241469
   Google Scholar
• Oetzel, J., Duran, B., Jiang, Y., & Lucero, J. (2007). Social support and social undermining as correlates for alcohol, drug, and mental disorders in American Indian women presenting for primary care at an Indian Health service hospital. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 187–206. doi: 10.1080/10810730601152771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Meara, K., & Stromquist, N. P. (2015). Faculty peer networks: Role and relevance in advancing agency and gender equity. Gender and Education, 27, 338–358. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1027668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. A. M., Biederman, L. A., Andersen, D., Ditonto, T. M., & Roe, K. (2019). Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipsen, M. I. (2008). Challenges of the faculty career for women: Success and sacrifice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Remedios, R., & Liberman, D. A. (2008). I liked your course because you taught me well: The influence of grades, workload, expectations, and goals on students’ evaluations of teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 91–115. doi: 10.1080/01411920701492043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., Stewart, L. P., & Hujber, M. (2000). Extending the domain of instructional effectiveness assessment in student evaluations of communication courses. Communication Education, 49, 253–266. doi: 10.1080/03634520009379214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman, L. S., Vandellen, M., & Wood, W. (2011). How women cope: Being a numerical minority in a male-dominated profession. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 492–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. J. (2017). The uses of platitudes. Current Affairs [online]. Retrieved from https://www.currentaffairs.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rocca, K. A. (2002). Verbal aggression in the classroom. Communication Teacher, 16(3), 15–16. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcmt20/current
   Google Scholar
• Rocca, K. A. (2004). College student attendance: Impact of instructor immediacy and verbal aggression. Communication Education, 53, 185–195. doi:10.1080/03634520410001682447n doi: 10.1080/03634520410001682447
   Google Scholar
• Rudick, C. K., & Dannels, D. P. (2019). “Yes, and … ” continuing the scholarly conversation about contingent labor in higher education. Communication Education, 68, 259–263. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2019.1572198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H. (2009). Evaluation in organizations: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change (2nd ed). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, C. T., Smith, S. W., Lee, B., & Miller, V. D. (2005). Exploring assorted beliefs, doubts, and legends regarding quantitative teaching evaluations. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 60, 257–271. doi: 10.1177/107769580506000305
   Google Scholar
• Schmelkin, L. P., Spencer, K. J., & Gellman, E. S. (1997). Faculty perspectives on course and teaching evaluations. Research in Higher Education, 38, 575–592. doi:10.1023/A:102499641 doi: 10.1023/A:1024996413417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P. (2003). Students’ appraisals of instructors as a function of students’ perceptions of instructors’ aggressive communication. Communication Education, 52, 106–121. doi: 10.1080/03634520302468
   Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., & Finn, A. N. (2011). Students’ perceived understanding: An alternative measure and its associations with perceived teacher confirmation, verbal aggressiveness, and credibility. Communication Education, 60, 231–254. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.535007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E., van Hoewyk, J., & Maher, M. P. (2000). Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 171–188. doi: 10.1086/317761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2008). Does gender influence online survey participation?: A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 501717.
   Google Scholar
• Sojka, J., Gupta, A. K., & Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. (2002). Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching: A study of similarities and differences. College Teaching, 50, 44–49. doi: 10.1080/87567550209595873
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., & Massoni, K. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can’t count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53, 779–793. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg, S. J., Snyder, E. A., Bejou, D., Vedder, R., & Taylor, M. C. (2010). Are they students? Or “customers”? The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com
   Google Scholar
• Tricker, T., Rangecroft, M., & Long, P. (2005). Bridging the gap: An alternative for course evaluations. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20, 185–192. doi: 10.1080/02680510500094249
   Google Scholar
• Tunguz, S. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Emotional labor in academia varies with tenure and gender. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 3–20. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.914919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Messages that hurt. In W. R. Cupach, & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 53–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., & Hampel, A. D. (2010). Hurtful communication: Current research and future directions. In S. W. Smith, & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New Directions in Interpersonal communication research (pp. 221–241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., Young, S., Carpenter-Theune, K., & Alexander, A. (2005). Why does it hurt? The perceived causes of hurt feelings. Communication Research, 32, 443–477. doi: 10.1177/0093650205277319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., & Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effects of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 393–424. doi: 10.1177/0265407500173005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinokur, A. D., & van Ryn, M. (1993). Social support and undermining in close relationships: Their independent effects on the mental health of unemployed persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 350–359. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl-Bauer, S. (2014). When disgruntled students go to extremes: The cyberbullying of instructors. Communication Education, 63, 429–448. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.942331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Chu, R., & Czujko, R. (2014). The 2012-13 survey of humanities departments at four-year institutions. College Park, MD: Statistical Research Center, American Institute of Physics.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, E. (Ed.). (2015). Solitudes of the workplace: Women in universities. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildermuth, S., & Davis, C. (2012). Flaming the faculty: Exploring root causes, consequences, and potential remedies to the problem of instructor-focused uncivil online student discourse in higher education. In L. Wankel & C. Wankel (Eds.), Misbehavior online in higher education (Cutting-edge technologies in higher education, Vol 5.) (pp. 379–404). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Winslow, S., & Davis, S. N. (2016). Gender inequality across the academic life course. Sociology Compass, 10, 404–416. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions. College Student Journal, 40, 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A. (2012). Student evaluations of teaching: Combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 683–699. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.563279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. L. (2004). Factors that influence recipients’ appraisals of hurtful communication. Journal Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 291–303. doi: 10.1177/0265407504042833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, S., & Applegate, J. L. (1994). Communicating social support in organizations. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 50–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar