CAT in the classroom: A multilevel analysis of students’ experiences with instructor nonaccommodation

References

• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aune, R. K., & Kikuchi, T. (1993). Effects of language intensity similarity on perceptions of credibility, relational attributions, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X93123004
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2016). The importance of instructor clarity and its effect on student learning: Facilitating elaboration by reducing cognitive load. Communication Reports, 29(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1067708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2019). Facilitating student attention with multimedia presentations: Examining the effects of segmented PowerPoint presentations on student learning. Communication Education, 68(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1517895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2020). Instruction, example order, and student learning: Reducing extraneous cognitive load by providing structure for elaborated examples. Communication Education, 69(3), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1701196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kelsey, D. M. (2016). Instructor clarity and student motivation: Academic performance as a product of students’ ability and motivation to process instructional material. Communication Education, 65(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kromka, S. M. (2020). Student assessment of narrative: Telling stories in the classroom. Communication Education, 69(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1622751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzea, D., & Goodboy, A. K. (2016). When instructors self-disclose but misbehave: Conditional effects on student engagement and interest. Communication Studies, 67(5), 548–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1212912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529809379112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J. W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, T. L., Schell, T., Giles, H., & Drogos, K. (2008). The influence of race in police-civilian interactions: A content analysis of videotaped interactions taken during cincinnati police traffic stops. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Communication accommodation theory. In C. R. Berger & M. Roloff (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (Vol. 1, pp. 176–196). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., Beck, A. C., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, T. K. (2019). CAT in the classroom: Understanding instructor behavior and student perceptions through communication accommodation theory [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky]. University Repository. https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.408
   Google Scholar
• Frey, T. K., & Tatum, N. T. (2016). Hoverboards and “hovermoms”: Helicopter parents and their influence on millennial students’ rapport with instructors. Communication Education, 65(3), 359–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1177846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Beck, A. C., Smith Bachman, A., Byars, C., Lamberth, C., & Thompson, J. (2016). The influence of instructor–student rapport on instructors’ professional and organizational outcomes. Communication Research Reports, 33(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1154834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Buckner, M. M. (2018). Rapport in the instructional context. In M. L. Houser & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), The handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (2nd ed.), (pp. 126–137). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The relationships among perceived instructor rapport, student participation, and student learning outcomes. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33(1), 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J. (2015). Perspective-taking, inferred motive, and perceived accommodation in nonaccommodative conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(5), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15584681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J. (2016a). Theoretical perspectives on interpersonal adjustments in language and communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts (pp. 13–35). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J. (2016b). The “dark side” of CAT: Nonaccommodation. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts (pp. 85–104). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Dragojevic, M. (2017). The effects of accumulated underaccommodation on perceptions of underaccommodative communication and speakers. Human Communication Research, 43(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Dragojevic, M. (2018). Effects of instrumental success and failure on perceptions of underaccommodative messages and sources. Communication Reports, 31(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1335760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2012). Effects of inferred motive on evaluations of nonaccommodative communication. Human Communication Research, 38(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15(2), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2013). Parameters of non-accommodation: Refining and elaborating communication accommodation theory. In J. Forgas, J. László, & V. Orsolya Vincze (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 155–172). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Taylor, D. M., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1977). Dimensions of Welsh identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420070205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnisci, A. (2005). Sequential strategies of accommodation: A new method in courtroom. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X16363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnisci, A., & Bakeman, R. (2007). Sequential accommodation of turn taking and turn length: A study of courtroom interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 234–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Cranmer, G. A., Sollitto, M., LaBelle, S., & Lancaster, A. L. (2017). What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics. Communication Education, 66(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60(4), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Baker, J. P. (2018). Instructor misbehaviors impede students’ cognitive learning: Testing the causal assumption. Communication Education, 67(3), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1465192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58(3), 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520902755441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050031006
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & An, J. (2020). A closed-form alternative for estimating ω reliability under unidimensionality. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2019.1656049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. (2000). Communicative predictors of solidarity in the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(6), 743–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32(4), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But … . Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00614.x
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, E. A., & Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, D. G., Watson, B. M., Gallois, C., Ward, M., & Leggett, B. A. (2009). Communication in medical records: Intergroup language and patient care. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08330612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosek, A. M., & Soliz, J. (2016). Expanding the landscape of diversity in instructional communication research through the intergroup perspective. Communication Education, 65(2), 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1098714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J., & McNeish, D. (2020). Small samples in multilevel modeling. In R. van de Schoot & M. Miočević (Eds.), Small sample size solutions: A guide for applied researchers and practitioners (pp. 215–225). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429273872-18
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Gallois, C., Barker, M., & Callan, V. J. (1994). Evaluations of interactions between students and academic staff: Influence of communication accommodation, ethnic group, and status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2), 158–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132004
   Google Scholar
• Klyukovski, A. A., & Medlock-Klyukovski, A. L. (2016). Instructor strategic ambiguity: Delineation of the construct and development of a measure. Communication Education, 65(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1142097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoster, K. C., & Goodboy, A. K. (2021). Making content relevant: A teaching and learning experiment with replication. Communication Education, 70(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1788106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft, I. G., De Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O’Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 59–110). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Hunt, S. K. (2008). “Cool” communication in the classroom: A preliminary examination of student perceptions of instructor use of positive slang. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 9(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430802400316
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Frymier, A. B., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). Theorizing about instructional communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 255–282). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2018). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2019). HLM for windows (Version No. 8). Scientific Software International, Inc. https://ssicentral.com
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (2017). Processing fluency in education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sidelinger, R. J., Nyeste, M. C., Madlock, P. E., Pollak, J., & Wilkinson, J. (2015). Instructor privacy management in the classroom: Exploring instructors’ ineffective communication and student communication satisfaction. Communication Studies, 66(5), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1034875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonds, B. K., Meyer, K. R., Quinlan, M. M., & Hunt, S. K. (2006). Effects of instructor speech rate on student affective learning, recall, and perceptions of nonverbal immediacy, credibility, and clarity. Communication Research Reports, 23(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090600796401
   Google Scholar
• Sloat, E., Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Sabo, K. E. (2017). Examining the factor structure underlying the TAP system for teacher and student advancement. AERA Open, 3(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417735526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and metaanalytical review of communication accommodation theory. In E. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook 38 (pp. 106–143). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, R. B., Giles, H., & Denes, A. (2013). Investigating stepparent-stepchild interactions: The role of communication accommodation. Journal of Family Communication, 13(3), 218–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.768248
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (1999). Communication accommodation between patients and health professionals: Themes and strategies in satisfying and unsatisfying encounters. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00170.x
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Ota, H., Giles, H., Pierson, H. D., Gallois, C., Ng, S. H., & Cai, D. (1997). Young people’s beliefs about intergenerational communication: An initial cross-cultural comparison. Communication Research, 24(4), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. H., Ryan, R. G., & Pugh, J. L. (2010). Professor-student rapport scale predicts student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 37(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.510976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltman, H., Feldstein, J., MacKay, C., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. N. (2012). Educational orientation and upward influence: An examination of students’ conversations about disappointing grades. Communication Education, 61(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.671949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar