The effect of clarity on learning: impacting motivation through cognitive load

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Abridged edition. Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, C., Huang, K.-T., Cotten, S. R., Rikard, R. V., & Coleman, L. O. (2016). Invaluable values: An expectancy-value theory analysis of youths’ academic motivations and intentions. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1139616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, C., Huang, K.-T., Rikard, R. V., & Cotten, S. R. (2019). The emotional costs of computers: An expectancy-value theory analysis of predominantly low-socioeconomic status minority students’ STEM attitudes. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00037-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergey, B. W., Parrila, R. K., & Deacon, S. H. (2018). Understanding the academic motivations of students with a history of reading difficulty: An expectancy-value-cost approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2016). The importance of instructor clarity and its effect on student learning: Facilitating elaboration by reducing cognitive load. Communication Reports, 29(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1067708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2017a). Development and validation of the clarity indicators scale. Communication Education, 66(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1202994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2017b). Instructor clarity, generative processes, and mastery goals: Examining the effects of signaling on student learning. Communication Education, 66(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1313438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2017c). Making an impact: Facilitating student success with lessons from instructional communication and educational psychology. Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2019). Examples and the facilitation of student learning: Should instructors provide examples or should students generate their own? Communication Education, 68(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1602275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kelsey, D. M. (2016). Instructor clarity and student motivation: Academic performance as a product of students’ ability and motivation to process instructional material. Communication Education, 65(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Stein, B. S., Vye, N. J., Franks, J. J., Auble, P. M., Mezynski, K. J., & Perfetto, G. A. (1982). Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(4), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.4.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J., & Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., & Liu, X. (2009). Task values, cost, and choice decisions in college physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.28.2.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302471
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The development of the teacher clarity short inventory (TCSI) to measure clear teaching in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362122
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379232
   Google Scholar
• Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civikly, J. M. (1992). Clarity: Teachers and students making sense of instruction. Communication Education, 41(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comadena, M. E., Hunt, S. K., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701446617
   Google Scholar
• Corpus, J. H., Robinson, K. A., & Liu, Z. (2022). Comparing college students’ motivation trajectories before and during COVID-19: A self-determination theory approach. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.848643
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel, A., Endres, T., & Renkl, A. (2020). Self-management as a bridge between cognitive load and self-regulated learning: The illustrative case of seductive details. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09559-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F., Callan, G., Juth, S., & Jeong, S. (2019). Cognitive load as motivational cost. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F., Franco, J., Chao, J., Peugh, J., & Maahs-Fladung, C. (2018). Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course. Learning and Instruction, 56, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Cranmer, G. A., Sollitto, M., Labelle, S., & Lancaster, A. L. (2017). What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics. Communication Education, 66(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135
   Google Scholar
• Houser, M. L., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). The role of student characteristics and teacher behaviors in students’ learner empowerment. Communication Education, 58(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802237383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, P. J.-H., Han-fen, H., & Xiao, F. (2017). Examining the mediating roles of cognitive load and performance outcomes in user satisfaction with a website: A field quasi-experiment. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.3.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. (2015). The role of cost in students’ academic motivation and achievement [Doctoral dissertation]. Korea University. http://dcollection.korea ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId = 000000060090
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Gaspard, H. (2018). An expectancy-value-cost approach in predicting adolescent students’ academic motivation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Yu, S. L., Koenka, A. C., Lee, H., & Heckler, A. F. (2022). Can self-efficacy and task values buffer perceived costs? Exploring introductory- and upper-level physics courses. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(4), 839–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1878992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBelle, S., Martin, M., & Weber, K. (2013). Instructional dissent in the college classroom: Using the instructional beliefs model as a framework. Communication Education, 62(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.759243
   Google Scholar
• Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P. (2013). Student emotional and cognitive interest as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student engagement. An examination of direct and interaction effects. Communication Education, 62(3), 253–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.777752
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H. J., & Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, S. M., Liao, H. L., Liu, S. H., & Hsieh, C. Y. (2010). The effects of user perception of value on use of blog services. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 38(8), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.8.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. A. (1997). A validation test of a message elaboration measure. Communication Research Reports, 14(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388670
   Google Scholar
• Santyasa, I. W., Rapi, N. K., & Sara, I. W. W. (2020). Project based learning and academic procrastination of students in learning physics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13132a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., Palminteri, S., Lafargue, G., & Pessiglione, M. (2010). Splitting motivation: Unilateral effects of subliminal incentives. Psychological Science, 21(7), 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610372636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., Rimmele, R., & Prenzel, M. (2005). Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. S. (2004). Students’ notetaking: The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity. Communication Education, 53(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452032000305922
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., & Mazer, J. P. (2010). Clarity in teaching and learning: Conundrums, consequences, and opportunities. In D. L. Fassett, & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 241–262). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 385–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkat, M. V., Sullivan Patricia, O., Young, S., Sewell, J. Q., & L, J. (2020). Using cognitive load theory to improve teaching in the clinical workplace. MedEdPortal, 16, 10983. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10983
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whelan, R. R. (2007). Neuroimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia. Educational Research Review, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: A model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Huang, B. (2008). How does teacher clarity affect student learning? A multi-cultural test for the mediated effect. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33(1), 10–19.
   Google Scholar