The Moderators and Mediators of Door-in-the-Face Requests: Is it a Negotiation or a Helping Experience?

References

• Abrahams , M. F. and Bell , R. A. 1994 . Encouraging charitable contributions: An examination of three models of door-in-the-face compliance . Communication Research , 21 : 131 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron , R. M. and Kenny , D. 1986 . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 : 1173 – 1182 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal , D. , Bar-Zohar , Y. , Greenberg , M. S. and Hermon , M. 1977 . Reciprocity behavior in the relationship between donor and recipient and between harm-doer and victim . Sociometry , 40 : 293 – 298 .
   Google Scholar
• Bell , R. A. , Abrahams , M. F. , Clark , C. L. and Schlatter , C. 1996 . The door-in-the-face compliance strategy: An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context . Communication Quarterly , 44 : 107 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz , L. and Daniels , L. 1963 . Responsibility and dependency . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 66 : 429 – 436 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster , F. J. , Mitchell , M. M. , Lapinski , M. K. , Orrego , V. O. , Cooper , H. and Reinke , R. 1999 . The impact of guilt and type of compliance-gaining message on helping behavior . Communication Monographs , 66 : 168 – 177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster , F. J. , Rodriguez , J. I. , Cruz , M. G. and Marshall , L. 1995 . The relative effectiveness of a direct request message and a pregiving message on friends and strangers . Communication Research , 22 : 475 – 484 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger , J. M. , Soroka , S. , Gonzago , K. , Murphy , E. and Somervell , E. 2001 . The effect of fleeting attraction on compliance to requests . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 27 : 1578 – 1586 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann , A. , Sherman , S. J. and Elkes , R. 1975 . Effects of first request size and timing of a second request on compliance: The foot in the door and the door in the face . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 32 : 774 – 782 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrill , J. G. and Seibold , D. R. 1986 . The perceptual contrast explanation of sequential request strategy effectiveness . Human Communication Research , 13 : 253 – 267 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertkoff , J. M. and Conley , M. 1967 . Opening offer and frequency of concession as bargaining strategies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 7 : 185 – 193 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. 1984 . Influence , New York : William Morrow .
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. 1993 . Influence: Science and Practice , 21 – 22 . New York : Harper Collins .
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. and Ascani , K. 1976 . Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, or further compliance with a request to give blood . Journal of Applied Psychology , 61 : 295 – 300 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. and Trost , M. R. 1998 . “ Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance ” . In Handbook of social psychology , 4th ed , Edited by: Gilbert , D. T. , Fiske , S. T. and Lindzey , G. Vol. 2 , 151 – 192 . Boston : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. , Vincent , J. E. , Lewis , S. K. , Catalan , J. , Wheeler , D. and Darby , B. L. 1975 . Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31 : 206 – 215 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark , M. S. 1981 . Noncomparability of benefits given and received: A cue to the existence of friendship . Social Psychology Quarterly , 44 : 375 – 381 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark , M. S. and Mills , J. 1979 . Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 : 2 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark , M. S. , Ouellette , R. , Powell , M. C. and Milberg , S. 1987 . Recipient's mood, relationship type, and helping . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53 : 94 – 103 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann , A. 2004 . The power of reciprocity: Fairness, reciprocity, and stakes in variants of the dictator game . Journal of Conflict Resolution , 48 : 487 – 505 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard , J. P. 1991 . The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 17 : 283 – 288 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard , J. P. and Hale , J. L. 1992 . Prosocialness and sequential request compliance techniques: Limits to the foot-in-the-door and the door-in-the-face? . Communication Studies , 43 : 220 – 232 .
   Google Scholar
• Dillard , J. P. , Hunter , J. E. and Burgoon , M. 1984 . Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face . Human Communication Research , 10 : 461 – 488 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr , E. and Gächter , S. 2000 . Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity . Journal of Economic Perspectives , 14 : 159 – 181 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern , E. F. , Monroe , K. B. and Avila , R. A. 1986 . Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results . Journal of Marketing Research , 23 : 144 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzen , J. K. and Davis , H. L. 1990 . Purchasing behavior in embedded markets . Journal of Consumer Research , 17 : 1 – 12 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman , G. , McVeigh , J. F. and Richterkessing , J. L. 1984 . Door-in-the-face procedure: Reciprocal concession, perceptual contrast or worthy person . Journal of Social Psychology , 123 : 245 – 251 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner , A. W. 1960 . The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review , 25 : 161 – 178 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güth , W. , Schmittberger , R. and Schwarze , B. 1982 . An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 3 : 367 – 388 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale , J. J. and Laliker , M. 1999 . Explaining the door-in-the-face: Is it really time to abandon reciprocal concessions? . Communication Studies , 10 : 203 – 210 .
   Google Scholar
• Komorita , S. S. and Brenner , A. R. 1968 . Bargaining and concession making under bilateral monopoly . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 9 : 15 – 20 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer , E. , Blank , A. and Chanowitz , B. 1978 . The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 36 : 635 – 642 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer , E. J. 1989 . Mindfulness , Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Mowen , J. C. and Cialdini , R. B. 1980 . On implementing the door-in-the-face compliance technique in a business context . Journal of Marketing Research , 27 : 253 – 258 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor , P. 1992 . Friendships between women: A critical review , New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. 1999 . Three reasons for doubting the adequacy of the reciprocal concessions explanation of door-in-the-face effects . Communication Studies , 50 : 211
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Figge , M. 1997 . A guilt-based explanation of the door-in-the-face influence strategy . Human Communication Research , 24 : 64 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Figge , M. 1999 . Guilt and expected guilt in the door-in-the-face technique . Communication Monographs , 66 : 312 – 324 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Hale , S. L. 1998 . The door-in-the-face influence strategy: A random-effects meta-analytic review . Communication Yearbook , 21 : 1 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Patch , M. E. , Hoang , V. R. and Stahelski , A. J. 1997 . The use of metacommunication in compliance: Door-in-the-face and single-request strategies . Journal of Social Psychology , 137 : 88 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratkanis , A. R. and Aronson , E. 2001 . Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion , New York : Bedford, Freeman, & Worth .
   Google Scholar
• Reeves , R. A. , Baker , G. A. , Boyd , J. G. and Cialdini , R. B. 1991 . The door-in-the-face technique: Reciprocal concessions vs. self-presentational explanations . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality , 6 : 345 – 558 .
   Google Scholar
• Rook , K. S. 1987 . Reciprocity of social exchange and social satisfaction among older women . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 52 : 145 – 154 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackelford , T. K. and Buss , D. M. 1996 . Betrayal in mateships, friendships, and coalitions . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 22 : 1151 – 1164 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusing , K. J. and Dillard , J. P. 2000 . The psychological reality of the door-in-the-face: It's helping, not bargaining . Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 19 : 5 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker , K. 1995 . “Always there for me:” Friendship patterns and expectations among middle- and working-class men and women . Sociological Forum , 10 : 273 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace , J. and Sadalla , E. 1966 . Behavioral consequences of transgression: I. The effects of social recognition . Journal of Experimental Research in Personality , 1 : 187 – 194 .
   Google Scholar
• Walster , E. , Walster , W. and Berscheid , E. 1978 . Equity: Theory and research , Boston : Allyn & Bacon, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Williamson , G. M. and Clark , M. S. 1992 . Impact of desired relationship type on affective reactions to choosing and being required to help . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 18 : 10 – 18 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson , G. M. , Clark , M. S. , Pegalis , L. J. and Behan , A. 1996 . Affective consequences of refusing to help in communal and exchange relationships . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 22 : 34 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn , K. I. , Crawford , D. W. and Fischer , J. 1991 . Equity and commitment in romance versus friendship . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality , 6 : 301 – 314 .
   Google Scholar