From Wall Street to Wellington: Protests in an Era of Digital Ubiquity

References

• Aikat, D. (2007, June). Many causes, one struggle: Gandhi's political journalism in South Africa (1893–1914). Paper presented at the first World Journalism Education Congress in conjunction with the 16th annual conference of the Asian Media Information and Communication Centre, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. (2003). Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication and Society, 6, 143–168. doi:10.1080/1369118032000093860a
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of Anti-Iraq War demonstrations in the U.S. Political Communication, 25, 269–289. doi:10.1080/10584600802197434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2011). Digital media and the personalization of collective action: Social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 770–799. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.579141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication and Society, 15, 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15, 365–388. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, R., & Gelsi, S. (2011, October 8). Occupy movement: A collective, vague effort: Everyone's in charge, no one's in charge as demonstrations persist. Marketwatch. Retrieved from http://www.marketwatch.com/story/occupy-movement-a-collective-vague-effort-2011-10-08
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996a). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996b). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. Journal of International Communication, 5, 773–787. doi:1932-8036/20110773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesters, G., & Welsh, I. (2004). Rebel colours: ‘Framing’ in global social movements'. The Sociological Review, 52, 314–335. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danitz, T., & Strobel, W. P. (1999). The internet's impact on activism: The case of Burma. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 22, 257–269. doi:10.1080/105761099265766
   Google Scholar
• Delicath, J. W., & DeLuca, K. M. (2003). Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups. Argumentation, 17, 315–333. doi:10.1023/A:1025179019397
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 125–151. doi:10.1080/07393180216559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E., Parker, P. S., & Krone, K. J. (2011). Navigating socio-spatial difference, constructing counter-space: Insights from transnational feminist praxis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4, 201–220. doi:10.1080/17513057.2011.569973
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121–147. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominion Post. (2011, October 23). Occupy Wellington numbers swell. Dominion Post, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J. (1989). Computers for political change. Journal of Communication, 39, 154–162. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, M., & Pal, M. (2010). Dialog theory in marginalized settings: A subaltern studies approach. Communication Theory, 20, 363–386. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Enck-Wanzer, D. (2006). Trashing the system: Social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lords Organization's garbage offensive. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92, 174–201. doi:10.1080/00335630600816920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2005). Other worlds are (already) possible. In J. Sen & P. Waterman (Eds.), World social forum: Challenging empires (pp. 349–358). Montreal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., Stanley, K., Berman, D., & Neff, G. (2005). How do organizations matter? Mobilization and support for participants at five globalization protests. Social Problems, 52, 102–121. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.1.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (1998). Communication and social justice research: Truth, justice and the applied communication way. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 155–164. doi:10.1080/00909889809365499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–266). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C. (2010). Qualifying engagement: A study of information and communication technology and the global social justice movement in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Communication Monographs, 77, 51–74. doi:10.1080/03637750903514284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (2012). Occupy nation: The roots, the spirit, and the promise of occupy wall street. Sydney: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com
   Google Scholar
• Harold, C. (2004). Pranking rhetoric: “Culture jamming” as media activism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21, 189–211. doi:10.1080/0739318042000212693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertog, J. K., & Mcleod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 139–161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Huesca, R. (2001). Conceptual contributions of new social movements to development communication research. Communication Theory, 11, 415–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. H. (1964). Field work in linguistics and anthropology. Studies in Linguistics, 14, 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. H. (2007). Fluidity, promiscuity, and mash-ups: New concepts for the study of mobility and communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 408–413. doi:10.1080/03637750701543543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, J. (2008a). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2008b). Performing politics: Image, embodiment, and affective solidarity during anti-corporate globalization protests. Ethnography, 9, 61–97. doi:10.1177/1466138108088949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39, 259–279. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). The moveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898367.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Staggenborg, S. (Eds.). (2002). Methods of social movement research. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, F. (2007). Protests and opportunities. Chicago, IL: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, J. C. (2011). How institutions communicate: Institutional messages, institutional logics, and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 154–182. doi:10.1177/0893318910389280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman-Wilzig, S. (1989). Protest, television, newspapers, and the public: Who influences whom? Political Communication & Persuasion, 6, 21–32. doi:10.1080/10584609.1989.9962862
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Rockart, J. F. (1991). Computers, networks, and the corporation. Scientific American, 265, 128–136. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mudaliar, P., Donner, J., & Thies, W. (2012, March 13–15). Emergent practices around CGNet Swara: A voice forum for citizen journalism in rural India. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. E., Cadena-Roa, J., & Strawn, K. D. (2003). Emerging trends in the study of protests and social movements. Research in Political Sociology, 12, 213–244. doi:10.1016/S0895-9935(03)12009-8
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. W. (2006a). Assessing the radical democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, technical and institutional constructions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23, 19–38. doi:10.1080/07393180600570691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. (2006b). United, yet autonomous: Indymedia and the struggle to sustain a radical democratic network. Media, Culture and Society, 28, 315–336. doi:10.1177/0163443706061685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J., & Krinsky, J. (2012). Why does occupy matter? Social Movement Studies, 11, 279–287. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.708923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routledge, P. (2003). Convergence space: Process geographies of grassroots globalization networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 333–349. doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D., Rochford, B., Worden, S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481. doi:10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl, C. (2012). Paradoxes of connectivity: Boundary permeability, technological variability, and organisational durability. Australian Journal of Communication, 38, 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791055
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, H. M., & Tener, M. (2010). Corporate proactivity as a discursive fiction: Managing environmental health activism and regulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 391–418. doi:10.1177/0893318909354116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar