Social in, Social out: How the Brain Responds to Social Language with More Social Language

References

• Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 280–289. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M., Aminoff, E., Mason, M., & Fenske, M. (2007). The units of thought. Hippocampus, 17, 420–428. doi:10.1002/hipo.20287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, E. T., & Falk, E. B. (2013). Beyond brain mapping: Using the brain to predict real-world outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 45–55. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–B25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, M., Anton, J., Valabregue, R., & Poline, J. (2002, June 2–6). Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Presented at the The 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York, NY: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (1996). Dynamic coordination of vocal and kinesic behavior in dyadic interaction: Methods, problems, and interpersonal outcomes. In J. Watt & C. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 353–386). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (1997). The development of theory about automated patterns of face-to-face human interaction. In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 57–84). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Palmer, M. T. (1989). The structure and organisation of verbal and nonverbal behaviour: Data for models of reception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 167–192. doi:10.1177/0261927X8983002
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173. doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803864
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56, 391–430. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9922.2006.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. The Neuroscientist, 13, 580–593. doi:10.1177/1073858407304654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self- and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1742–1752. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietvorst, R. C., Verbeke, W. J. M., Bagozzi, R. P., Yoon, C., Smits, M., & van der Lugt, A. (2009). A sales force–specific theory-of-mind scale: Tests of its validity by classical methods and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 653–668. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.5.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., & Pierce, L. G. (2006). Using linguistic analysis to identify high performing teams. In Proceedings of the Command and Control Research Technology Symposium, San Diego, CA, CCRTS.
   Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Pulvermuller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topography, 27, 375–392. doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermuller, F. (2013). Early and parallel processing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts: neurophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 86, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). The neural bases of social pain: Evidence for shared representations with physical pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 126–135. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182464dd1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294–300. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2008). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1878–1890). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_143
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2012). Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In P. Rebuschat & J. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 265–304). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, D. L. (2012). Language: The cultural tool. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., Morelli, S. A., Welborn, B. L., Dambacher, K., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Creating buzz: The neural correlates of effective message propagation. Psychological Science, 24, 1234–1242. doi:10.1177/0956797612474670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., O’Donnell, M. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). Getting the word out: Neural correlates of enthusiastic message propagation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 313. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91, 1357–1392. doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511663673
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Smith, P. M. (1979). Accomodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 45–65). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/0093650209351468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2013). Linguistic synchrony in parasocial interaction. Communication Studies, 64, 453–466. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.773923
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., Cermáková, A., Teubert, W., & Yallop, C. (2004). Lexicology and corpus linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., & Honey, C. J. (2012). Future trends in neuroimaging: Neural processes as expressed within real-life contexts. NeuroImage, 62, 1272–1278. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44. doi:10.1177/0956797610392928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflective and reflexive judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. In J. P. Forgas, K. R. Williams, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 44–67). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Social cognitive neuroscience. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 143–193). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Maldjian, J., Laurienti, P., Burdette, J., & Kraft, R. (2003). An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage, 19, 1233–1239. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00169-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., Schüffelgen, U., Jbabdi, S., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2012). Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right “temporoparietal junction area”: Evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1894–1903. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. P. L., Forrest, C. L. D., McLaren, R. P., Jones, F. W., Aitken, M. R. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2014). Associations and propositions: The case for a dual-process account of learning in humans. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 108, 185–195. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50, 655–663. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 337–360. doi:10.1177/026192702237953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). Sharing one's story: On the benefits of writing or talking about emotional experience. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 621–632). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2012). Dual processes, probabilities, and cognitive architecture. Mind & Society, 11(1), 15–26. doi:10.1007/s11299-011-0096-3
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (in press). Linking neuroimaging with functional linguistic analysis to understand processes of successful communication. Communication Methods and Measures.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC. net.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 2005, 1045–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassa, Y., Sugiura, M., Jeong, H., Horie, K., Sato, S., & Kawashima, R. (2007). Cortical mechanism of communicative speech production. NeuroImage, 37, 985–992. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, R. (2010). The right temporo-parietal junction: A specific brain region for thinking about thoughts. In A. Leslie & T. German (Eds.), Handbook of theory of mind. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people the role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.” Neuroimage, 19, 1835–1842. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00230-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J. (2006). It's the thought that counts specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17, 692–699. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01768.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, J., Triantafyllou, C., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Brown, E. N., & Saxe, R. (2009). Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention. PLoS One, 4, e4869. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semin, G. R. (2007). Grounding communication: Synchrony. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 630–649). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (2010). Learning: From association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273–301. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spunt, R. P., Falk, E. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Dissociable neural systems support retrieval of how and why action knowledge. Psychological Science, 21, 1593–1598. doi:10.1177/0956797610386618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 14425–14430. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008662107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2000). The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics, 10(4), 401–413.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691; discussion 691–735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., … Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15, 273–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houdé, O., … Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage, 30, 1414–1432. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, B. D. (2000). Simulateneous Inference for FMRI Data (AlphaSim) (Version AlphaSim: AFNI version=AFNI_2011_12_21_1014 (Jan 28 2012)). Biophysics Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/manual/AlphaSim.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8, 665–670. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar