The Effects of Repetitive News Framing on Political Opinions over Time

References

• Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102, 215–232. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden, C., & Lecheler, S. (2012). Fleeting, fading, or far-reaching? A knowledge-based model of the persistence of framing effects. Communication Theory, 22, 359–382. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345–365. doi:10.1080/10584600802426965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizer, G. Y., & Petty, R. E. (2005). How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology, 26, 553–568. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2005.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104, 663–680. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1179–1206. doi:10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7(2), 191–214. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0702_4
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. (2012). New avenues for framing research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 365–375. doi:10.1177/0002764211426331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU: Linking content analysis and experimental data. Communications: The European Journal of Communication, 3, 261–281. doi:10.1515/comm.2003.024
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041–1066. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671–686. doi:10.1017/S0003055404041413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Fein, J., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). A source of bias in public opinion stability. American Political Science Review, 106, 430–454. doi:10.1017/S000305541200012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). Learning more from political communication experiments: Pretreatment and its effects. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 875–896. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 729–745. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. (2013). Effects of negative political advertising and message repetition on candidate evaluation. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 268–291. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.672615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2007). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15, 1–20. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorn, G. J., & Goldberg, M. E. (1980). Children's responses to repetitive television commercials. The Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 421–424. doi:10.1086/208785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Gun policy, opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames. Journal of Politics, 63, 520–543. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 205–218. doi:10.1086/209393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). From repetition to conviction: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 594–601. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750–767. doi:10.2307/2669279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155–162. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Zerback, T. (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63, 993–1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinaki, F., & Lunt, P. (1997). The relationship between involvement, attitude accessibility and attitude–behaviour consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497–509. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61, 959–983. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 185–204. doi:10.1177/1077699011430064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2013). What a difference a day makes? The effects of repetitive and competitive news framing over time. Communication Research, 40(2), 147–175. doi:10.1177/0093650212470688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., De Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36, 400–425. doi:10.1177/0093650209333028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Rittberger, B. (2008). Shifting Europe's boundaries: Mass media, public opinion and the enlargement of the EU. European Union Politics, 9, 243–267. doi:10.1177/1465116508089087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. (2013). Media fragmentation, party system, and democracy. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 43–60. doi:10.1177/1940161212458200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2007). Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications, 32(1), 51–78. doi:10.1515/COMMUN.2007.003
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Schemer, C. (2012). Diachronic framing effects in competitive opinion environments. Political Communication, 29, 319–339. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.694985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. G. (2012). It's about time: The lifespan of information effects in a multiweek campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 298–311. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. G. (2014). Here today, gone tomorrow? Assessing how timing and repetition of scandal information affects candidate evaluations. Political Psychology, 35, 679–701. doi:10.1111/pops.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Communication Research, 30, 224–247. doi:10.1177/0093650202250881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997a). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997b). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behaviour, 19, 221–246. doi:10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Hart, P. S., Myers, T., & Ellithorpe, M. (2013). Attitude change in competitive framing environments? Open‐/closed‐mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63, 766–785. doi:10.1111/jcom.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, J. (2004). Our long ‘return to the concept of powerful mass media’ – A cross-national comparative investigation of the effects of consonant media coverage. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(2), 144–168. doi:10.1093/ijpor/16.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 173–212). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. Communication Research, 24, 481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, Z. (2010). Measuring the impact of PR on published news in increasingly fragmented news environments: A multifaceted approach. Journalism Studies, 11, 799–816. doi:10.1080/14616701003760550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, A. R. T., & De Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5–23. doi:10.1177/0267323106060987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2014, May). All hostile media: Group membership, ingroup identification and consonance of news reporting as moderator of the hostile media effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123–137. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55, 795–809. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2004). Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: The foundation of media effects research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 168–183. doi:10.1177/107769900408100112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. (2010). When can political parties lead public opinion? Evidence from a natural experiment. Political Communication, 27(2), 158–177. doi:10.1080/10584601003709381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90155-5
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, K. K., & Rains, S. A. (2011). Information and communication technology sequences and message repetition in interpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 38(1), 101–122. doi:10.1177/0093650210362679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 332–348. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804–829. doi:10.1177/107769900007700406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 17–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550–569. doi:10.1177/009365099026005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwanath, A. (2009). From belief-importance to intention: The impact of framing on technology adoption. Communication Monographs, 76, 177–206. doi:10.1080/03637750902828438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511818691
   Google Scholar