The influence of heterogeneous exposure and pre-deliberation queries on pretrial publicity effects

References

• American Council on Education. (2005). By the numbers: A national portrait of today’s college students. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/College-Students-Today-A-National-Portrait-2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Mundt, C. A., Clark, J. W., & John, S. (2008). I want to apologize, but I don’t want everyone to know: A public apology as pretrial publicity between a criminal and civil case. Law and Psychology Review, 32, 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., & Rajki, M. (1994). Extra-legal factors and product liability: The influence of mock jurors’ demographic characteristics and intuitions about the cause of an injury. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 127–147. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370120204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruschke, J. C. (2006). The intersection of legal practice and social science on the issue of pretrial publicity. In A. Reynolds & B. Barnett (Eds.), Communication and law: Multidisciplinary approaches to research (pp. 61–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bruschke, J., & Loges, W. E. (2004). Free press vs. fair trials: Examining publicity’s role in trial outcomes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B. (2007). The role of death qualification in jurors’ susceptibility to pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 115–123. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Kerr, N. L., Alfini, J. J., Weaver, F. M., MacCoun, R. J., & Feldman, V. (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187–201. doi: 10.1007/BF01046209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary-Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. D. (2010). Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 133–154. doi:10.1348/135532509X465624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. W. (1986). Pretrial publicity, the timing of the trial, and mock jurors’ decision processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16, 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Buddenbaum, J., Houp, S. Studebaker, N., & Stolle, D. P. (2009). Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: Data from the field. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 136–148. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9144-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein, S., McCloskey, A. L., & Tomlinson, T. M. (1997). Can the jury disregard that information? The use of suspicion to reduce the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity and inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1215–1226. doi: 10.1177/01461672972311008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fein, S., Morgan, S. J., Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (1997). Hype and suspicion: The effects of pretrial publicity, race, and suspicion on jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 487–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., Martin, C. K., & Mota, V. L. (1998). Pretrial publicity: Effects of admonition and expressing pretrial opinions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 255–270. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00365.x
   Google Scholar
• Fulero, S. M. (1987). The role of behavioral research in the free press/fair trial controversy. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 259–264. doi: 10.1007/BF01044645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulero, S. M. (2002). Afterword: The past, present, and future of applied pretrial publicity research. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 127–133. doi: 10.1023/A:1013885309899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulero, S. M., & Penrod, S. D. (1990). Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help? Forensic Reports, 3, 233–259.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (2013). Research methods: A process of Inquiry (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Honess, T. M., Charman, E. A., & Levi, M. (2003). Factual and affective/evaluative recall of pretrial publicity: Their relative influence on juror reasoning and verdict in a simulated fraud trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1404–1416. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01955.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 111–119. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, K. R., Jones, N. A., & Ramirez, R. R. (2011, March 22). Race and Hispanic origin in the 2010 census. Retrieved from http://2010.census.gov/news/pdf/03-22-2011_webinar_slides.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. M. (1991). The latest empirical studies on pretrial publicity, jury bias, and judicial remedies – not enough to overcome the first amendment right of access to pretrial hearings. American University Law Review, 40, 841–848.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L. (1994). The effects of pretrial publicity on jurors. Judicature, 78, 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Kerwin, J., & Shaffer, D. R. (1994). Mock jurors versus mock juries: The role of deliberations in reactions to inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 153–162. doi: 10.1177/0146167294202002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovera, M. B. (2002). The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of the moderators and mediating mechanisms. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 43–72. doi: 10.1023/A:1013829224920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409–438. doi: 10.1007/BF01044220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindman, R. (1989). Sources of judicial mistrust of social science evidence: A comparison of social science and jurisprudence. Indiana Law Journal, 64, 755–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, K., & Nunez, N. (2000). The effect of jury deliberations on jurors’ propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 932–939. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, G. B. (1987). Bringing psychology to the legal system: Opportunities, obstacles, and efficacy. American Psychologist, 42, 488–495. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 345–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muma, J. R. (1997). The need for replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3605.927
   Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P. (2000). Two steps forward and one step backward: The law and psychology movement(s) in the 20th century. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 457–483. doi: 10.1023/A:1005596414203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olczak, P. V., Kaplan, M. R., & Penrod, S. (1991). Attorneys’ lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 431–452.
   Google Scholar
• Padawer-Singer, A. M., & Barton, A. H. (1975). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors’ verdicts. In J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America: A critical overview (pp. 125–139). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A., & Singer, M. (1974). Voir dire by two lawyers: An essential safeguard. Judicature, 57(9), 386–391.
   Google Scholar
• Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A. N., & Singer, R. L. J. (1977). Legal and social-psychological research in the effects of pretrial publicity on juries, numerical makeup of juries, non-unanimous verdict requirements. Law and Psychology Review, 3, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, B., Baer, J., Jasperson, A., DeLaat, J. (2001). Low-life-sleazy big-haired-trailer-park girl v. the President: The Paula Jones case and the law of sexual harassment. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and Law, 9, 283–304.
   Google Scholar
• Pember, D. R. (1990). Mass media law. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, R. G. (1993). Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial case. Psychological Reports, 73, 819–832. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollings, H. E., & Blascovich, J. (1977). The case of Patricia Hearst: Pretrial publicity and opinion. Journal of Communication, 27, 58–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., Dickman, M. & Mayes, J. L. (2014). Exposure to both positive and negative pretrial publicity reduces or eliminates mock-juror bias. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4, 30–40. doi:10.5923/j.ijpbs.20140401.05
   Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., Guenther, C. C., & Yarbrough, A. (2011). Positive and negative pretrial publicity: The roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 511–534. doi:10.1177/0093854811400823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & Guenther, C. G. (2015). From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors’ decisions, impressions, and memory. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 294–310. doi:10.1037/lhb0000117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & Hudak, E. M. (2013). Pretrial publicity and juror age affect mock-juror decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 179–202. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.616509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & McEvoy, C. (2008). Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 226–235. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C., Mayes, J. L., Dickman, M. C., & McEvoy, C. (2012). Timing and type of pretrial publicity affect mock-jurors’ decisions and predecisional distortion. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 108–119. doi:10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120204.06
   Google Scholar
• Ruva, C., McEvoy, C., & Bryant, J. B. (2007). Effects of pre-trial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 45–67. doi:10.1002/acp.1254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. I., & Skolnick, P. (2004). Effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity from physical and witness evidence on mock juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2132–2148. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02693.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against black defendants in the American Courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201–229. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 219–235. doi: 10.1023/A:1022325019080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 3, 428–460. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, C. A., Robbennolt, J. K., Penrod, S. D., Pathak-Sharma, M. K., Groscup, J. L., & Davenport, J. L. (2002). Studying pretrial publicity effects: New methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 19–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1013877108082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sue, S., Smith, R. E., & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity, and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299–1302. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3f.1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surette, R. (1992). Media trials and echo effects. In R. Surette (Ed.), The media and criminal justice policy: Recent research and social effects (pp. 177–192). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, J. A. (1998). From O. J. to Tim McVeigh and beyond: The Supreme Court’s totality of circumstances test as ringmaster in the expanding media circus. Denver University Law Review, 75, 549–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-restest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., & Viney, W. (2007). General pretrial publicity in sexual assault trials. Psychological Reports, 101, 527–530. doi:10.2466/PR0.101.2.527-530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar