The promises and pitfalls of personalization in narratives to promote social change

References

• Aust, C. F., & Zillmann, D. (1996). Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 787–803. doi:10.1177/107769909607300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., & Gollust, S. E. (2013). Framing childhood obesity: How individualizing the problem affects public support for prevention. Political Psychology, 34(3), 327–349. doi:10.1111/pops.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer, T. K., Luke, D. A., Haire-Joshu, D. L., Bates, H. S., & Brownson, R. C. (2008). Preventing obesity through state policy: Predictors of bill enactment. America Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 333–340. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. G., & Babrow, A. S. (2004). The role of empathy in responses to persuasive risk communication: Overcoming resistance to HIV prevention messages. Health Communication, 16(2), 159–182. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1602_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388–404. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2013). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 1–19. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
   Google Scholar
• Coplan, A. (2004). Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62(2), 141–152. doi:10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00147.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. (1998). Advertising narratives: What are they and how do they work. In B. B. Stern (Ed.) Representing consumers: Voices, views, and visions (pp. 267–289). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eyler, A. A., Nguyen, L., Kong, J., Yan, Y., & Brownson, R. (2012). Patterns and predictors of enactment of state childhood obesity legislation in the United States: 2006–2009. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2294–2302. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faison, H. (2010, September 27). How a West Philadelphia family overcame childhood obesity. Philadelphia Inquirer.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, T. R., Dietz, W., & Collins, J. (2010). Reducing childhood obesity through policy change: Acting now to prevent obesity. Health Affairs, 29(3), 357–363. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genevsky, A., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., & Knutson, B. (2013). Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: Affect shifts preferences for giving. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 17188–17196. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-13.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. doi:10.1177/0093650211408594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S163–S183. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. doi: 10.1080/15213260802492000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L., & Woods, S. (2005). The importance of similarity in empathic interaction. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.) Encyclopaedia of human computer interaction (pp. 303–310). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E.T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenni, K., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235–257. doi: 10.1023/A:1007740225484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D. (2014). Cultural characters and climate change: How heroes shape our perception of climate science. Social Science Quarterly, 95(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?. Policy Studies Journal, 38, 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. A. (1989). A study of selected issues in vividness research: The role of attention and elaboration enhancing cues. Advances in Consumer Research, 16(1), 574–580.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, L. K., Sobush, K., Keener, D., Goodman, K., Lowry, A., Kakietek, J., & Zaro, S. (2009). Recommended community strategies and measurements to prevent obesity in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 58(RR07), 1–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, H. S., Bigman, C. A., Leader, A. E., Lerman, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Narrative health communication and behavior change: The influence of exemplars in the news on intention to quit smoking. Journal of Communication, 62, 473–492. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The “identified victim” effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 157–167. doi:10.1002/bdm.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., … Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. doi:10.1080/08836610701357922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemal, M., & Van den Bulck, J. (2010). Testing the effectiveness of a skin cancer narrative in promoting positive health behavior: A pilot study. Preventive Medicine, 51(2), 178–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, L. H. (2009). Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting news frames in lung cancer and obesity coverage. Journal of Health Communication, 14(2), 174–188. doi: 10.1080/10810730802659939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2010). Myths and fallacies of personally identifiable information. Communications of the ACM, 53, 24–26. doi: 10.1145/1743546.1743558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Kim, H. K., Lundell, H., Fazili, F., & Frazier, B. (2012). Beyond counterarguing: Simple elaboration, complex integration, and counterelaboration in response to variations in narrative focus and sidedness. Journal of Communication, 62, 758–777. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Roh, S., & Dreisbach, C. (2016). How narrative focus and a statistical map shape health policy support among state legislators. Health Communication, 31, 242–255. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.998913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., Kim, H. K., Bartolo, D., & Porticella, N. (2014). Narrative persuasion, causality, complex integration, and support for obesity policy. Health Communication, 29, 431–444. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.761805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M., & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions of responsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactive counterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research, 37, 295–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle, K. (2013). Transportation into vivid media violence: A focus on attention, emotions, and mental rumination. Communication Quarterly, 61(4), 446–462. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2013.799512
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30, 102–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00726.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 453–483. doi:10.1111/psj.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research, 23, 210–235. doi: 10.1177/009365096023002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16. doi: 10.1023/A:1022299422219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Strnad, J. (2006). Statistical, identifiable and iconic victims and perpetrators. In E. J. McCaffery and Joel Slemrod (Eds.), Behavioral public finance: Toward a new agenda (pp. 32–46). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, C. S., & Tulloch, J. (2000). Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, J. J., & Leung, C. C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem’s urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 436–449. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Krakow, M., John, K. K., Liu, M., & Weaver, J. (2016). Framing obesity: How news frames shape attributions and behavioral responses. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 139–147. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1039676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn, B. A., Sacks, G., Hall, K. D., McPherson, K., Finegood, D. T., Moodie, M. L., & Gortmaker, S. L. (2011). The global obesity pandemic: Shaped by global drivers and local environments. The Lancet, 378(9793), 804–814. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60813-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service (ERS). (2016). Food access research atlas: Documentation. Retrieved January 18, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/documentation.aspx#.UkWdTXfsY3M
   Google Scholar
• Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mayorga, M., & Peters, E. (2014). Compassion fade: Affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need. Plos One, 9(6), e100115. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. A., Childs, K. E., Maschinski, C., Paul Niño, N., & Ellsworth, R. (2010). Regulatory fit, processing fluency, and narrative persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1181–1192. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. A., Hesse, S. J., Petkova, Z., & Trudeau, L. (2009). “This story is right on”: The impact of regulatory fit on narrative engagement and persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 447–456. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar