Explaining parental coviewing: The role of social facilitation and arousal

References

• Bickham, D. S., Schmidt, M. E., & Huston, A. C. (2012). Attention, comprehension, and the educational influences of television and other electronic media. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 113–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Crites Jr.S. L. (1992). Social neuroscience: Principles of psychophysiological arousal and response. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 72–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. A., Wright, J. C., & Huston, A. C. (1987). Form cues and content difficulty as determinants of children’s cognitive processing of televised educational messages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 311–327. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(87)90010-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakroff, J., & Nathanson, A. I. (2008). Parent and school interventions: Mediation and media literacy. In S. L. Calvert & B. J. Wilson (Eds.), The handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 552–576). West Sussex: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444302752.ch24
   Google Scholar
• Christakis, D. (2009). The effects of infant media usage: What do we know and what should we learn? Acta Paediatrica, 98, 8–16. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01027.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, W. A., Wellman, H., Keniston, A., & Westby, S. (1978). Age-related aspects of comprehension and inference from a televised dramatic narrative. Child Development, 49, 389–399. doi:10.2307/1128703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Sense Media. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.
   Google Scholar
• Common Sense Media. (2016). Man vs. Wild. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/tv-reviews/man-vs-wild#
   Google Scholar
• Connell, S. L., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media, 9, 5–21. doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.997440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, K. K., Francis, L. A., & Birch, L. L. (2005). Links between parents’ and girls’ television viewing behaviors: A longitudinal examination. The Journal of Pediatrics, 147, 436–442. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr, A., Kovaric, P., & Doubleday, C. (1989). Parent-child coviewing of television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33, 35–51. doi:10.1080/08838158909364060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, D. E., & Anderson, D. R. (1985). Instruction and modality effects on children’s television attention and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 91–100. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.1.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, D. A., Nathanson, A. I., Rasmussen, E. E., Reimer, R. A., & Walsh, D. A. (2012). Do you see what I see? Parent and child reports of parental monitoring of media. Family Relations, 61, 470–487. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00709.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252. doi:10.2307/1131378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32(4), 385–410. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the international affective picture system: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855–879. doi:10.1177/0146167298248006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, B. G. (2012). Medialab research software (Version 2012). New York, NY: Empirisoft.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkorian, H. L., & Anderson, D. R. (2011). Learning from educational media. In S. L. Calvert & B. J. Wilson (Eds.), The handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 188–213). West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17, 275–299. doi:10.1177/009365090017003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media processes and effects (pp. 193–204). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Chung, Y., Lee, S., & Zhao, X. (2005). It’s the product: Do risky products compel attention and elicit arousal in media users? Health Communication, 17, 283–300. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1703_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, E. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1979). The relationship of visual attention to children’s comprehension of television. Child Development, 50, 722–727. doi:10.2307/1128938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Mediation of children’s television viewing: Working toward conceptual clarity and common understanding. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 25, pp. 115–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I., & Cantor, J. (2000). Reducing the aggression-promoting effect of violent cartoons by increasing children’s fictional involvement with the victim: A study of active mediation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 125–142. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4401_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek, B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 771–785. doi:10.1177/0146167201277001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2015). Grow and tell: As children age from toddlers to teens, their media palate changes. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/grow-and-tell-as-children-age-from-toddlers-to-teens-their-media-palate-changes.html
   Google Scholar
• Paavonen, E. J., Roine, M., Pennonen, M., & Lahikainen, A. R. (2009). Do parental co-viewing and discussions mitigate TV-induced fears in young children? Child: Care, Health and Development, 35, 773–780. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01009.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E. E. (2014). Proactive vs. retroactive mediation: Effects of mediation’s timing on children’s reactions to popular cartoon violence. Human Communication Research, 40, 396–413. doi:10.1111/hcre.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds (publication #8010). Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527859.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, N., & Morgan, M. (1987). Cohesion and control: Adolescents’ relationships with parents as mediators of television. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 299–314. doi:10.1177/0272431687073006
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M. L., Ramani, G. B., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2016). Parental involvement and children’s motivation and achievement: A domain-specific perspective. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 459–476). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1977). Effects of encouraging Israeli mothers to Co-observe “sesame street” with their five-year-olds. Child Development, 48, 1146–1151. doi:10.2307/1128378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Leigh, T. (1984). Predispositions about learning from, print and television. Journal of Communication, 34, 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang, F., Schmitz, B., & Tasche, K. (1993). Developmental trends in television coviewing of parent-child dyads. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 531–542. doi:10.1007/BF01537714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(4), 323–355. doi:10.3102/10769986023004323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, G. G., & Sparks, C. W. (2000). Violence, mayhem, and horror. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 73–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. V., & Lang, A. (2010). An initial examination of the post-auricular reflex as a physiological indicator of appetitive activation during television viewing. Communication Methods and Measures, 4, 311–330. doi:10.1080/19312458.2010.527872
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. V., Matthews, C., & Chung, S. (2011). The influence of arousal on encoding and storage of information in pleasant television messages. Southwest Mass Communication Journal, 27, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348–1357. doi:10.2307/1130626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasburger, V. C., Wilson, B. J., & Jordan, A. B. (2014). Children, adolescents, and the media (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, L., & Stevens, R. (2011). The new coviewing: Designing for learning through joint media engagement. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Cantor, J. (2000). Children’s likes and dislikes of entertainment programs. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 135–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52–66. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P. (2001). It’s all entertainment – sure. But what exactly is entertainment? Communication research, media psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experiences. Poetics, 29, 247–261. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(01)00037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388–408. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, B. T., Welch, K. B., & Gałecki, A. T. (2014). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. R., Rasmussen, E. E., & King, A. (2015). Restrictive mediation and unintended effects: Serial multiple mediation analysis explaining the role of reactance in U.S. adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 9(4), 510–527. doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.1088873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. J., & Weiss, A. J. (1993). The effects of sibling coviewing on preschoolers’ reactions to a suspenseful movie scene. Communication Research, 20, 214–248. doi:10.1177/009365093020002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M. S. & Nathanson, A. I. (2005, May). Reconceptualizing coviewing as a kind of mediation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3681.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 160–168. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90077-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar