Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias

References

• Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70, 542–555. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608080493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campitelli, G., & Gerrans, P. (2014). Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition, 42, 434–447. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, R., Barber, J. M., & Shook, N. J. (2013). Techniques for measuring selective exposure: A critical review. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 147–171. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2013.813925
   Google Scholar
• Coe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (2009). Cognitive dissonance theory – a roller coaster career: How communication research adapted the theory of cognitive dissonance. In T. Hartmann (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (pp. 128–148). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Kinder, D. R., & Larter, W. M. (1983). The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 381–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90029-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society, 9, 319–342. doi: 10.1177/1461444807075015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. doi:10.2307/4134953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J., & Sears, D. O. (1963). Voters’ preference among types of information. American Psychologist, 18, 375. doi: 10.1037/h0049143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004-2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113–134. doi: 10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro- and counter-attitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40, 309–332. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Selective exposure to cable news and immigration in the U.S.: The relationship between FOX News, CNN, and attitudes toward Mexican immigrants. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 597–615. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.732138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, J., & Aday, S. (2008). Selective attention to online political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 86–100. doi: 10.1080/08838150701820874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvirsman, S. D. (2014). It’s not that we don’t know, it’s that we don’t care: Explaining why selective exposure polarizes attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 74–97. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2013.816738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588. doi: 10.1037/a0015701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. doi: 10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M. (2014a). Challenges to selective exposure: Selective seeking and avoidance in a multitasking media environment. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 665–688. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2013.835425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M. (2014b). Seeking congruency or incongruency online? Examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Science Communication, 36, 143–167. doi: 10.1177/1075547013502733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2013). The dark side of the boon? Credibility, selective exposure and the proliferation of online sources of political information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1862–1871. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Zhang, W., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Voices of convergence or conflict? A path analysis investigation of selective exposure to political websites. Social Science Computer Review, 29, 449–469. doi: 10.1177/0894439310379962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch, S., Hastall, M., Zillmann, D., & Callison, C. (2003). Imagery effects on the selective reading of internet newsmagazines: A cross-cultural examination. Communication Research, 30, 3–29. doi: 10.1177/0093650202239023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. Journal of Communication, 62, 628–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., Johnson, B. K., Westerwick, A., & Donsbach, W. (2015). Political online information searching in Germany and the U.S.: Confirmation bias, source credibility, and attitude impacts. Journal of Communication, 65, 489–511. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–1151. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracín, D. (2004). The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 143–172. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57, 611–623. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowin, A. (1967). Approach and avoidance: Alternate modes of selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1–9. doi: 10.1037/h0024531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 43–66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56, 27–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (in press). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research. doi: 10.1177/0093650215613136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Priester, J. R. (2009). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 125–164). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1977). Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 645–655. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Kasmer, J. A., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1987). Source and message factors in persuasion: A reply to Stiff’s critique of the elaboration likelihood model. Communication Monographs, 54, 233–249. doi: 10.1080/03637758709390229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 464–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341–366. doi: 10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The White House. (2010). Remarks by the President at University of Michigan spring commencement. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-university-michigan-spring-commencement
   Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 684–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., & Clarkson, J. J. (2007). Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: The effects of source credibility in multiple message situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 559–571. doi: 10.1177/0146167206296955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7, 251–271. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62, 39–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63, 432–453. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2012). Selecting science information in Web 2.0: How source cues, message sidedness, and need for cognition influence users’ exposure to blog posts. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 80–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01596.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., Knobloch, S., & Yu, H.-S. (2001). Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3, 301–324. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar