Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale

References

• Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62, 815–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., Andrews, K. R., & Serota, K. (2011). Identifying influence: Development and validation of the connectivity, persuasiveness, and maven scales. Journal of Communication, 61, 178–196. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j/1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradner, E., Kellogg, W. A., & Erickson, T. (1999). The adoption and use of ‘Babble’: A field study of chat in the workplace. In Ecscw’99 (pp. 139–158). Copenhagen: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A. N., & Reips, U. D. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 157–165. doi:10.1002/asi.20459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153–170. doi:10.2307/257090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355–366. doi:10.2307/248682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. C., Van Der Heide, B., Vendemia, M. A., & Vang, M. H. (in press). How people evaluate online reviews. Communication Research. doi: 10.1177/0093650215573862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2003). A “mix of attributes” approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53, 395–410. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feaster, J. C. (2010). Expanding the impression management model of communication channels: An information control scale. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 115–138. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168–176. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117–140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors, 79–54. doi: 10.1145/108844.108856
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghlin Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18, 385–401. doi:10.1080/01972240290108195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2014). Communication channel, sex, and the immediate and longitudinal outcomes of verbal person-centered support. Communication Monographs, 81, 439–468. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.933245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. J. (2009). Networking in everyday life (Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto. Retrieved from http://individual.utoronto.ca/berniehogan/Hogan_NIEL_10-29-2008_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Barnett, S. (2005). Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation. Discourse Studies, 7, 147–171. doi:10.1177/1461445605050364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (2007). Development of the affect for communication channels scale. Journal of Communication, 57, 349–365. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation, and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283–301. doi:10.1016/0020-7373(91)90045-9
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Measuring online communication attitude: Instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 76, 463–486. doi:10.1080/03637750903300262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M. (2014). Online communication attitude similarity in romantic dyads: Predicting couples’ frequency of e-mail, instant messaging, and social networking site communication. Communication Quarterly, 62, 233–252. doi:10.1080/01463373.2014.890120
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Oh, S. Y. (2012). To personalize or depersonalize? When and how politicians’ personalized tweets affect the public’s reactions. Journal of Communication, 62, 932–949. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01681.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., & Weinstein, L. (2009, November). Measuring (tele)presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. Presented at the Twelfth International Workshop on Presence, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McOmber, J. B. (1999). Technological autonomy and three definitions of technology. Journal of Communication, 49, 137–153. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyrowitz, J. (2009). Medium theory: An alternative to the dominant paradigm of media effects. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 517–530). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C., & Mason, L. (1990). On the study of technology and task: A variable-based approach. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 46–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00763.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. (2008). Characterizing the communicative affordances of MySpace: A place for friends or a friendless place? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer Internet users. Journal of Communication, 63, 721–744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Technology device ownership 2015. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34, 100–125. doi:10.1177/0093650206296084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr., A., Dimmick, J., Feaster, J., & Lin, S. F. (2008). Revisiting interpersonal media competition: The gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Communication Research, 35, 529–547. doi:10.1177/0093650208315979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr., A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, F. J. M., & Reid, D. J. (2010). The expressive and conversational affordances of mobile messaging. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 3–22. doi:10.1080/014492907014970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI in the new millennium (pp. 247–272). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37(4), 65–94. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb01009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Steinfield, C. (1994). Experiences with new forms of organizational communication via electronic mail and voice messaging. In J. H. E. Andriesson & R. A. Roe (Eds.), Telematics and work (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, B. A. (2014). Deviant behavior in computer-mediated communication: Development and validation of a measure of cybersexual harassment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 197–214. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., & Burke, T. J. (2015). Complementary channel use and the role of social competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 37–51. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18, 487–523. doi:10.1177/009365091018004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, A., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-attribute-perception” model. Media Psychology, 10, 292–315. doi:10.1080/15213260701375686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 629–666. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C. W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 777–804). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 296–311. doi:10.1177/1077699016630255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2013, January). Factors affecting individual flaming in virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3282–3291). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2013.230
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Bellur, S. (2011). Concept explication in the Internet age: The case of interactivity. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques (pp. 485–500). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, 53, 676–693. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02917.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, C. C., & Bucy, E. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33, 397–426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. doi:10.1177/0146167208318067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treem, J., & Leonardi, P. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (vol. 38, pp. 143–189). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in the digital age. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 489–505). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2013). Affordances, effects, and technology errors. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (vol. 38, pp. 190–193). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Gay, G., & Hancock, J. T. (2005). How do communication and technology researchers study the internet? Journal of Communication, 55, 632–657. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F., & Rice, R. E. (1983). Communication research and the new media technologies. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 7, pp. 200–224). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar